All Activity

The good news is they cant be worse than their last team. QB cant be worse than the last one, hopefully they will get a man sized qb with some skills. Vidors set it and forget it scheme hurts them alot but Mathews chose his best friend as his replacement and its the same ole' same ole'. Its the state of mind and good ole boy system that will always hurt them. They are barely making the playoffs in one of the worst districts in the state and the powers that be are content with that. When DuBois builds his retirement up he will assign Trahan to fill his spot. No hope in sight, nothing changes until it changes

The attackers are possibly white.

Since none of our liberal friends wants to touch this, I thought it was time to post and discuss. Two white people getting savagely attacked. Only 1 called 911. The rest either participated or filmed the evil that was happening. Serious question: what's wrong with these people? It says here that Trump might push for this being a hate crime. How can anyone that watches this think this is something other than a hate crime?!

Because they are all a bunch of liars. They want him to be white just like Zimmerman so they can keep the division going. He’s obviously black. Has it been reported that way? Of course not. It’s why Trump calls them fake news to their faces. They deserve that from the president.

Found one at the Target in Huntsville of all places.

CNN Calls Shane Tamura “Possibly White”! From the article: "A black-looking black guy who turns out to be part Asian walks into an office building in Midtown Manhattan and murders four people. How do you suppose CNN would report it? Here’s how: In the photos first shared online, [Shane] Tamura, 27, was captured in broad daylight walking into 345 Park Ave. with a Palmetto State Armory AR-15 rifle in his hand. [CNN anchor Erin] Burnett said police knew the gunman had “sunglasses, mustache, male, possibly white” during a broadcast shortly after the shooting Monday evening." [Hidden Content] @Big girl @CardinalBacker @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood Can one of ya'll explain?!

Sure they have and more than once. You just don’t like the answer. They might overturn or clarify earlier rulings but they most definitely have ruled. I have posted this more than once but in Elk v Wilkins the Supreme Court ruled that a Native American Indian born in Montana on US soil, was not an American citizen. Even though born in the US, Elk was not a citizen because he was a Native American and owed his allegiance to another country, that of the Winnebago Indians. Elk later moved to Nebraska and registered to vote. He was denied as he was not a US citizen. Elk surd claiming that because of the Fourteenth Amendment and he was born on US soil (as a Native American no less), he was a citizen. Elk even renounced any allegiance to the Winnebago Nation. The Supreme Court said that it doesn’t matter, you are not an American citizen. It was such a landmark ruling that 40 years later, the US Congress enacted a federal law, under their constitutional authority, giving American Indians citizenship at birth. The Fourteenth Amendment did not so it took an act of Congress to make Native Americans, Americans. Even today Native Americans have sovereignty on reservations as independent nations. They can have their own laws and courts outside control of US law and hold jurisdiction over Native Americans who are on reservation land. In Wong Kim Ark the Supreme Court ruled that a child born on US soil to two Chinese citizens was an American at birth but his parents were lawfully in the US. So while you have the right not to agree with the Supreme Court, they most definitely have ruled. Just like Plessy v. Ferguson which upheld separate but equal laws on race was later overturned by Brown v Board of Education and Roe v. Wade upholding abortion rights was later overturned by Dobbs v. Jackson WHO, the Supreme Court could in an upcoming decision overturn Elk and clarify Wong Kim Ark I made exactly that prediction in this forum weeks ago. The Supreme Court would take the case and essentially modify Wong Kim Ark and declare a person born on US soil has birthright citizenship. To say that the Supreme Court hasn’t ruled is simply not correct.

Maybe AP Jr Will Be The Next Move In

Well, not exactly.

That's what I heard.

Move in?

AP

Who is his uncle?

Did This Running backs Unc Happen To Play Pro Ball?

I've been told Silsbee has found their RB. Stay tuned.

He's a bumbling, has been hack trying to make a buck.

I said the same thing about Roger Stone.😂

Young... Next year and the following year will be the year Vidor makes hella noise.

Norm Eisen & ethics in the same sentence is an oxymoron. Label him what he is—a left wing political hack.

Vidor will be young and still a year out.

Yet, Norm didn't care the 4 years Biden was President and would of had a friendlier administration to get them from. THis is just political theater.

They haven't ruled on it, yet.