Jump to content

The Showdown - Alto Vs. SA


mmccary

Recommended Posts

This could potentially be the last game at Wolf Stadium before the new stadium is built!  Bond election is coming up....and everyone better vote!  With that being said...it will be senior night, and with all of the emotions being factored in it will be a long night for the Yellowjackets.  SA is very good at stopping the run, and that is that is what Alto does best.  Alto let WS score on em, SA did not let their offense in the End Zone.  The Wolves have been stingy on defense and looking a lot better on offense.  The Wolves want their 2nd district title in a row and Alto is standing in the way.  If SA comes out fired up....watch out!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sa is pretty good, but I am going with Alto in this one.  More balanced and their defense isn't bulletproof.  WS, who was with out their best RB most of the game, moved the ball on them pretty effectively only punting two times.  Alto is more physical and bigger than SA is on the line.  They will run right at SA and pound the ball taking a lot of clock.  I believe Alto's defense is better than SA's offense who overall struggled against the WS defense scoring on a few blown coverages that Alto won't give up.  It will be a good one that could go either way, but I have to pick one, and thats is where Im leaning after seeing both teams.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="500nomore" post="1313936" timestamp="1351538820"]
Sa is pretty good, but I am going with Alto in this one.  More balanced and their defense isn't bulletproof.  WS, who was with out their best RB most of the game, moved the ball on them pretty effectively only punting two times.  Alto is more physical and bigger than SA is on the line.  They will run right at SA and pound the ball taking a lot of clock.  I believe Alto's defense is better than SA's offense who overall struggled against the WS defense scoring on a few blown coverages that Alto won't give up.  It will be a good one that could go either way, but I have to pick one, and thats is where Im leaning after seeing both teams.
[/quote]

Did you watch the WS game?  They only had about 150 total yards and you call that effective?  SA has 3 kids least 250+ on the line that trade back and forth to stay fresh.  Even if WS had their best rb missing for most of the game they had Lacey in the backfield and he was ineffective most of the game.  SA came up with stops when they needed to...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="500nomore" post="1313936" timestamp="1351538820"]
Sa is pretty good, but I am going with Alto in this one.  More balanced and their defense isn't bulletproof.  WS, who was with out their best RB most of the game, moved the ball on them pretty effectively only punting two times.  Alto is more physical and bigger than SA is on the line.  They will run right at SA and pound the ball taking a lot of clock.  I believe Alto's defense is better than SA's offense who overall struggled against the WS defense scoring on a few blown coverages that Alto won't give up.  It will be a good one that could go either way, but I have to pick one, and thats is where Im leaning after seeing both teams.
[/quote]
I wonder why that starting RB was sitting out?

They never scored but only punted twice. That sounds like a lot of 4th down conversions that didn't happen!

This will be the toughest game that SA has had to play all year! They need to make sure that they are ready mentally when they step out on the field friday night. If they go to work and play football like they're capable of they will be fine!

Sr night, possibly the last Varsity game ever played on the current field, and the District Championship on the line...........What do you think?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blown coverage??? SA scored running the ball. How does that translate to blown coverage?? Come on man? And SA held west Sabine to 150 yards of offense, that's called shutting an offense down my friend. Alto is very good but SA has the tools to beat them if they put it all together. Gonna be a dog fight either way
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="SAWolverine" post="1313976" timestamp="1351541171"]
[quote author=500nomore link=topic=105423.msg1313936#msg1313936 date=1351538820]
Sa is pretty good, but I am going with Alto in this one.  More balanced and their defense isn't bulletproof.  WS, who was with out their best RB most of the game, moved the ball on them pretty effectively only punting two times.  Alto is more physical and bigger than SA is on the line.  They will run right at SA and pound the ball taking a lot of clock.  I believe Alto's defense is better than SA's offense who overall struggled against the WS defense scoring on a few blown coverages that Alto won't give up.  It will be a good one that could go either way, but I have to pick one, and thats is where Im leaning after seeing both teams.
[/quote]

Did you watch the WS game?  They only had about 150 total yards and you call that effective?  SA has 3 kids least 250+ on the line that trade back and forth to stay fresh.  Even if WS had their best rb missing for most of the game they had Lacey in the backfield and he was ineffective most of the game.  SA came up with stops when they needed to...
[/quote]
LT and RT are over 300 lbs. The rest are around 220 lbs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • What the writer stated wrt crossover votes in the primary/runoff: "Covey and his supporters Paxton and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Phelan only won because Democrats crossed over to vote in the Republican Primary for him. Paxton said Covey’s campaign identified “at least” 1,442 Democrats who voted early in Jefferson County in the primary runoff. Texas does not have party registration, but a voter’s primary voting history is public. The Covey campaign has not released its methodology behind its claim, but  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  by The Texan news website found that 9% of Republican voters in the March District 21 primary had voted in one of the previous four Democratic primaries. However, only 5% of that group had voted in all four previous Democratic primaries. What Phelan’s opponents did not mention is historically Democratic Jefferson County is undergoing a political transition towards the Republican party — the county judge switched his affiliation to the GOP in 2017 — so many residents have a mixed primary voting history. And Phelan’s allies in the House dismissed the idea that liberals swung the election. "I knocked on doors, hundreds and hundreds of doors, made calls for Dade,” Republican Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said on Mark Davis’ radio program Wednesday. “I did not speak to a single Democrat down here in HD21. Not a single one." "  
    • He's with it enough to do what he's told, beginning day 1 when he signed the order to revoke the Keystone Pipeline project.  But more recently, he's protecting the DOJ, as well as himself ...  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Most 75-80 year Olds have some type of cognitive impairment. If you are asking if Biden has dementia then my answer is no. That is a Republican talking point. If you all think he has dementia what type do you think he has?
    • A lot better showing from the Ags tonight!   Bring on Oregon 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...