West Orange Stark vs Robinson

[dj]

17 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

You folks keep talking about the "50". I believe you are clueless about the "50" and "defenses" in general. WOS has a great defense and utilizes their personnel well. 

Do you even watch the game. I know what the 50 defense is.do you?? And apparently you don't know how it was ran here for years.

[dj]

5 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

Yeah, that is the point. They know not what they say. 

It's not Abt CT 50. it's what the kids run.and sometimes they try to run cover 2.in some situations.but, do you even know what your talking about.played the game and know the know the game.u must be watching some other team play.

[dj]

2 minutes ago, dj said:

It's not Abt CT 50. it's what the kids run.and sometimes they try to run cover 2.in some situations.but, do you even know what your talking about.played the game and know the know the game.u must be watching some other team play.

And by the way since he thinks he knows.w.o  has had all there success through the years running it.its just these days there not shooting gaps the way they have done it through the years.when all the great teams that came through w.o the one common thing that they had was a great 3 down lineman.any year that was a successful year.and quick rovers coming off the edge to put heat on the QB.what u don't know is CT alot of times went with smaller dline to cause havoc.and that started in the early 90's when he had a 135 ng name TJ locks.he was unblockable.the difference in CT 50 and the current staff is HH rather try it with size and it really isn't working.if you knew w.o history u would know that!! And the other big difference CT would put his best 11 guys on defense.and it was all about pursuing the football.all 11 to the ball.your an outsider that doesn't know how this goes.but, if you do the your homework you would HH knew he had to go back to what the kids knew.and once again u know nothing Abt w.o team.so, if you ever wanna debate I'll give you the history and bring it back to 78 and 79 when they first became w.o.s

[WOSdrummer99]

@dj we know who knows. Dont waste your time bro

[89Falcon]

6 hours ago, dj said:

And by the way since he thinks he knows.w.o  has had all there success through the years running it.its just these days there not shooting gaps the way they have done it through the years.when all the great teams that came through w.o the one common thing that they had was a great 3 down lineman.any year that was a successful year.and quick rovers coming off the edge to put heat on the QB.what u don't know is CT alot of times went with smaller dline to cause havoc.and that started in the early 90's when he had a 135 ng name TJ locks.he was unblockable.the difference in CT 50 and the current staff is HH rather try it with size and it really isn't working.if you knew w.o history u would know that!! And the other big difference CT would put his best 11 guys on defense.and it was all about pursuing the football.all 11 to the ball.your an outsider that doesn't know how this goes.but, if you do the your homework you would HH knew he had to go back to what the kids knew.and once again u know nothing Abt w.o team.so, if you ever wanna debate I'll give you the history and bring it back to 78 and 79 when they first became w.o.s

Do you "proofread" these before you post? 

[dj]

9 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

@dj we know who knows. Dont waste your time bro

Your right bro. The only reason I address him bcz, he highlight a comment a made.LOl, but you and I know.and if he knew the system was even in play every since I was in the 7th grade.and I've never played on a losing team!!that goes that far back.the system works if it's ran right.