Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

Not sure why they keep saying ‘Socialist.’ His ideas are straight up Communism.

I’ve always called a socialist democrat a communist and have been corrected. I believe the distinction to be a fine line by definition, while believing socialism leads to communism. It’s such a fine line (ownership) New Yorkers won’t know what hit ‘em till it’s too late. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, baddog said:

I’ve always called a socialist democrat a communist and have been corrected. I believe the distinction to be a fine line by definition, while believing socialism leads to communism. It’s such a fine line (ownership) New Yorkers won’t know what hit ‘em till it’s too late. 

Easy distinction.

Socialism is when a very few rich people who aren’t in the ruling party still have a nickel. Everyone else has less.

Communism is when you look up at the people with less in envy.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I wouldn't mind government ran stores for people needing food assistance. These grocery stores would have basics and not ribeye's or lobster. These folks could be issues a card that only works in the government run grocery stores.  This would limit what they could purchase.....Plus beans, rice and ground meat don't have a huge resale value...

Posted
3 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

I wouldn't mind government ran stores for people needing food assistance. These grocery stores would have basics and not ribeye's or lobster. These folks could be issues a card that only works in the government run grocery stores.  This would limit what they could purchase.....Plus beans, rice and ground meat don't have a huge resale value...

I agreed with your first sentence. Then you devolved into describing a “have vs.have not” social order. Then you had to stick the “crooked poor people” tag with the comment “…don’t have a high resale value”.  Sounds kind of like a segregationist back in the Jim Crow days.

Posted
15 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I agreed with your first sentence. Then you devolved into describing a “have vs.have not” social order. Then you had to stick the “crooked poor people” tag with the comment “…don’t have a high resale value”.  Sounds kind of like a segregationist back in the Jim Crow days.

Nothing wrong with what he said, you simply live in the pathetic world of reading “woe is me” into every thing that is said, especially if it comes from someone that won’t openly declare hatred for Trump.

We could use more Hippys in the world and less victims like you.

Posted
12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Nothing wrong with what he said, you simply live in the pathetic world of reading “woe is me” into every thing that is said, especially if it comes from someone that won’t openly declare hatred for Trump.

We could use more Hippys in the world and less victims like you.

People don’t abuse food stamps…. yeah, right. Head in the sand. Lmao

Posted
54 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I agreed with your first sentence. Then you devolved into describing a “have vs.have not” social order. Then you had to stick the “crooked poor people” tag with the comment “…don’t have a high resale value”.  Sounds kind of like a segregationist back in the Jim Crow days.

We do live in a have versus have not society....we can never all be equal. I was not the smartest guy in my class. I've worked hard and provided my Son everything he could want. I think everyone can do the same with effort. I TRULY believe everyone is equal, it's the decisions that are made that make the difference.  I may have been able to be as rich as Elon Musk, but when I went to Lamar, I decided to party, have fun, drink beer at the Setzer center (that's how old I am) - and date as many women as humanly possible......and I successfully completed those goals and have some great memories. Sadly, graduating college was not something that was important to me back then, and I had to work hard to over come that. 

I didn't want anyone paying for my bad decisions and I don't want to pay for someone else's bad decisions. 

Posted

This is a horrible idea. If you want to do something, create COOP grocery stores like we have in rural areas. Trade some time working in said COOP for discounted groceries. Basically, have memberships & have the members help each other. Plenty of work is required from dockwork, to stocking, inventory control, checkout, janitorial, accounting, pricing, etc.

Workforce is provided, discounts are provided, and labor skills are gained. Free market competition is still maintained. Win all the way around with very little government involvement—if any.

That’s about all I have to say on the matter.

Posted
3 hours ago, UT alum said:

I agreed with your first sentence. Then you devolved into describing a “have vs.have not” social order. Then you had to stick the “crooked poor people” tag with the comment “…don’t have a high resale value”.  Sounds kind of like a segregationist back in the Jim Crow days.

I worked in inner city Beaumont for 15 years, exclusively with families below the poverty line. Lots of them do things right, but lots of them abuse the system. To pretend the abuse isn’t rampant is silly. As someone who devoted what will end up being around half of my professional career to helping and working with the impoverished, I have no issue with more restrictions on what government handouts are used for. Nobody should starve, but other people’s tax money shouldn’t be spent on luxuries. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

I worked in inner city Beaumont for 15 years, exclusively with families below the poverty line. Lots of them do things right, but lots of them abuse the system. To pretend the abuse isn’t rampant is silly. As someone who devoted what will end up being around half of my professional career to helping and working with the impoverished, I have no issue with more restrictions on what government handouts are used for. Nobody should starve, but other people’s tax money shouldn’t be spent on luxuries. 

Ditto…

im still working in Bmt….and plan to stay for another 13 or so years.

Posted

Another progressive activist, economic justice socialist warrior is leading the mayoral race in Seattle. It’s clear the far left Socialist wing of the Democratic Party has all the momentum.

The Democratic Party as it was known from the Kennedy days is gone. They may as well change their name to The New Socialist Party.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,291
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    BBtater984
    Newest Member
    BBtater984
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...