Jump to content

Beaumont Kelly forced to forfeit


cat001

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Nov. 6 he will become eligible.

Most say had he been eligible, he would be Silsbee's starting QB.

But Moshier (current starting QB) isn't doing too bad. 1800 yards, 20 TD's 0 INT's in 7 games.

Im sure he will be moved up. What other position can he play? Receiver or secondary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so basically what im gathering from this forum is talent was never the issue, cause according to this board the players leaving Brook and going to other programs and would be starting or at least be playing heavy snaps at high ranking programs??

P.S: yes I know 6-A is totally different but still that doesn't mean they shouldn't be competitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Per the news report at 6 tonight, Kelly has forfeited 3 games due to using an ineligible player and also illegal recruiting of a student athlete. Those forfeits are against St. Pius, Concordia Lutheran and Tarkington.

Kelly's record now is 1-6.

These sanctions came from TAPPS.

So TAPPS schools aren't allowed to recruit? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Yeoj said:

West Brook coaches are the reasons parents are sending their kids to Kelly. Langston has signed leaving for athletic reasons on all kids that transfer out. WB has kids playing at damn near all the surrounding area schools with most of them having to play JV because of Langston not signing off on their paperwork.

So he's just supposed to say yeah you guys go play somewhere else when they are leaving because WB is in toughest district in the state?

WB already in deficit with talent compared to who they play so why would the coach let open the doors to the remaining players to leave?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheOutsider said:

So he's just supposed to say yeah you guys go play somewhere else when they are leaving because WB is in toughest district in the state?

WB already in deficit with talent compared to who they play so why would the coach let open the doors to the remaining players to leave?

West Brook had no problem competing in the toughest district in the state before he got there. Hell they made it to the championship game out of that same district. Parents are pulling their kids because of the product he puts out on the field and his inability to even have those kids prepared to play. What does it benefit him and the kids still at WB to try and hold on to kids that didn't want to be there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Yeoj said:

West Brook had no problem competing in the toughest district in the state before he got there. Hell they made it to the championship game out of that same district. Parents are pulling their kids because of the product he puts out on the field and his inability to even have those kids prepared to play. What does it benefit him and the kids still at WB to try and hold on to kids that didn't want to be there?

It doesn't benefit him. You just openly admitted the kids are leaving for athletic reasons. Do you suggest he lie on the paperwork? If that's the truth it is what it is. Kelly had this coming. The baseball program has been doing the same kind of things. Do not be surprised if TAPPS investigations head that way next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

What you're going to start seeing more of is families moving their student-athlete kids out of BISD after their 8th grade year is over to avoid all that paperwork mess. 

This is what happens when the coach goes 6-21 with three games left in his third season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gogo173489 said:

It doesn't benefit him. You just openly admitted the kids are leaving for athletic reasons. Do you suggest he lie on the paperwork? If that's the truth it is what it is. Kelly had this coming. The baseball program has been doing the same kind of things. Do not be surprised if TAPPS investigations head that way next.

Sounds like you're bitter about losing either games or kids to Kelly. LMAO... If my son showed the ability to be good at a sport and had the ability to play at the next level, there's no way in hell I'm letting him stay and play for a coach that sucks at his job. What type of scouts are showing up to see a team that loses a football game 71-0?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Not sure but TAPPS does have rules and regulations they have to follow. It's not a free for all like some people think.

Saying they had to forfeit for "illegal recruitment" without any detail explaining how the recruiting was illegal makes it seem like recruiting in itself is illegal to me. Really weird 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Setx fan said:

Saying they had to forfeit for "illegal recruitment" without any detail explaining how the recruiting was illegal makes it seem like recruiting in itself is illegal to me. Really weird 

They also played an ineligible player.

I honestly do not know what the policies are with TAPPS. I just posted what the news reported.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yeoj said:

No Bryce's brother Brock isn't in high school yet. Brock King who was a stand out athlete at Vincient Middle School went to PAM for high school last year. King got an offer in 8th grade I believe.

Yup, got offered by Louisville. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...