Jump to content

Trump Running in 2024


Hagar

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

Trump is starting to lose it.  The stuff he says just gets crazier and crazier.  I really am starting to think that his end goal is to be a dictator.  He's that arrogant and self-absorbed.  

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   


In before the trumpers turn on bullets13, as they did cardinalbacker 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

That's the only bad decision? Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

When you start trying to overturn not only your elections, but to alter elections of your handpicked candidates around the country, while trying to ruin anyone who dares speak out against you… the question is how far he’ll go to gain control.  I know that threshold hasn’t been reached yet.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump knows exactly how the dims are stacking the deck against the American people with their liberal/woke/communist ideology. I applaud anyone who fights that tooth and nail. People have died fighting communism for all of us and we reward that (in their memory) by electing them into our government……. Shameful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

When you start trying to overturn not only your elections, but to alter elections of your handpicked candidates around the country, while trying to ruin anyone who dares speak out against you… the question is how far he’ll go to gain control.  I know that threshold hasn’t been reached yet.  

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.

Trump encouraged people to overthrow the government 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Trump knows exactly how the dims are stacking the deck against the American people with their liberal/woke/communist ideology. I applaud anyone who fights that tooth and nail. People have died fighting communism for all of us and we reward that (in their memory) by electing them into our government……. Shameful!

Do you know what the word communism means? Apparently not. Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what would voting look like if we removed names and parties from people? They spoke on their beliefs and their agenda's but we couldn't see their faces. Their history of what they have and haven't supported was shown next to their candidacy (we know a great majority of people aren't going to try and research this). I bet we would find different people in offices all over the country. Too many people vote on parties, or for a name, or against a name, etc. A lot of people vote for a certain party because that's what their parents voted for. I would be willing to be it people really took a neutral approach from the beginning...we would see different results in a lot of elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JSnipes said:

So what would voting look like if we removed names and parties from people? They spoke on their beliefs and their agenda's but we couldn't see their faces. Their history of what they have and haven't supported was shown next to their candidacy (we know a great majority of people aren't going to try and research this). I bet we would find different people in offices all over the country. Too many people vote on parties, or for a name, or against a name, etc. A lot of people vote for a certain party because that's what their parents voted for. I would be willing to be it people really took a neutral approach from the beginning...we would see different results in a lot of elections.

So can you give me one policy that the Democrats stand for that a conservative would embrace, just one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LumRaiderFan said:

So can you give me one policy that the Democrats stand for that a conservative would embrace, just one?

Nope, and probably can't give you one the other way around. The point is if it was possible to do it this way we wouldn't see what we see. What percentage of people do you think actually invest time into deciding who they vote for? I'm going to guess...not a high percentage. I was the first person in my family to ever vote Republican because I started paying attention to what the candidates were talking about and what they stood for. This was way back in 2000. I know my grandparents and parents would not have agreed for the other party had they listened. They voted that way because they always had.

How much of every campaign is attacking the other person? That's a waste of time as well. 

 

I also don't think politicians in the parties agree with all the policies in their party. They are just a member of that party because they agree with the majority of the policies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JSnipes said:

Nope, and probably can't give you one the other way around. The point is if it was possible to do it this way we wouldn't see what we see. What percentage of people do you think actually invest time into deciding who they vote for? I'm going to guess...not a high percentage. I was the first person in my family to ever vote Republican because I started paying attention to what the candidates were talking about and what they stood for. This was way back in 2000. I know my grandparents and parents would not have agreed for the other party had they listened. They voted that way because they always had.

How much of every campaign is attacking the other person? That's a waste of time as well. 

 

I also don't think politicians in the parties agree with all the policies in their party. They are just a member of that party because they agree with the majority of the policies. 

Agree 100% with both statements in bold, especially the first one.  There were a lot of folks that had no idea the train wreck that was coming when Biden was elected, but there were a lot of us that were not surprised how things turned out, we had already seen the template under Obama.

As to the second, you can say that about most constituents as well, no party is perfect, you have to go with what aligns as best with your ideology, or choose to have no voice at all.

The shame of it is, the Republican platform is very close to my ideology, but the implementation of it by Washington Republicans is not.

Good post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.


oh look, the billionth “whataboutism” reply on this forum 

and the person you’re replying to isn’t even a democrat! LOL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

The shame of it is, the Republican platform is very close to my ideology, but the implementation of it by Washington Republicans is not.

Good post.

Good point. Unfortunately the two parties have also grown so far apart in the past 10-20 years there is nothing but hate for one another. A house divided cannot stand…if they can’t fix themselves in Washington we will collapse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • What the writer stated wrt crossover votes in the primary/runoff: "Covey and his supporters Paxton and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Phelan only won because Democrats crossed over to vote in the Republican Primary for him. Paxton said Covey’s campaign identified “at least” 1,442 Democrats who voted early in Jefferson County in the primary runoff. Texas does not have party registration, but a voter’s primary voting history is public. The Covey campaign has not released its methodology behind its claim, but  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  by The Texan news website found that 9% of Republican voters in the March District 21 primary had voted in one of the previous four Democratic primaries. However, only 5% of that group had voted in all four previous Democratic primaries. What Phelan’s opponents did not mention is historically Democratic Jefferson County is undergoing a political transition towards the Republican party — the county judge switched his affiliation to the GOP in 2017 — so many residents have a mixed primary voting history. And Phelan’s allies in the House dismissed the idea that liberals swung the election. "I knocked on doors, hundreds and hundreds of doors, made calls for Dade,” Republican Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said on Mark Davis’ radio program Wednesday. “I did not speak to a single Democrat down here in HD21. Not a single one." "  
    • He's with it enough to do what he's told, beginning day 1 when he signed the order to revoke the Keystone Pipeline project.  But more recently, he's protecting the DOJ, as well as himself ...  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • Most 75-80 year Olds have some type of cognitive impairment. If you are asking if Biden has dementia then my answer is no. That is a Republican talking point. If you all think he has dementia what type do you think he has?
    • A lot better showing from the Ags tonight!   Bring on Oregon 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...