Jump to content

Trump Plans To Launch Own Social Network 'TRUTH Social' Next Year!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

He merged with another company and their stock went up like 1200% since Wednesday....

Who knows if the social media start up will work.........but if it does not, it won't be because of money......

No doubt. He’s legitimately one of the best fundraisers of all time, if you disregard the sketchiness and legality of it all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

No doubt. He’s legitimately one of the best fundraisers of all time, if you disregard the sketchiness and legality of it all 

If you take away the sketchiness and legality, Trump can't hold a candle to the Clintons and Bidens. Since your whole focus is whining about Trump, I thought I would let you know about that dirty little secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Englebert said:

If you take away the sketchiness and legality, Trump can't hold a candle to the Clintons and Bidens. Since your whole focus is whining about Trump, I thought I would let you know about that dirty little secret.

You’re a still playing catch up gramps

its us vs. them, and I know you ain’t in the top 0.1%!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, InMAGAWeTrust said:

You’re a still playing catch up gramps

its us vs. them, and I know you ain’t in the top 0.1%!

Can you rephrase your contention in a understandable manner? Why do you keep embarrassing yourself like this?

And for bonus points, tell us how you come to your conclusions. I'm already starting to chuckle at the thought of your retort. Oh wait, you will just tuck tail and run, only to reappear on another topic ushering more simplton insults. At least you are funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Can you rephrase your contention in a understandable manner? Why do you keep embarrassing yourself like this?

And for bonus points, tell us how you come to your conclusions. I'm already starting to chuckle at the thought of your retort. Oh wait, you will just tuck tail and run, only to reappear on another topic ushering more simplton insults. At least you are funny.

Since you asked.. I’ll DUMB it down for you. 

 

You are way too POOR to be out here defending millionaire and billionaire politicians. They literally do not care about you. You look silly and brainwashed.


Better? If not, oh well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Since you asked.. I’ll DUMB it down for you. 

 

You are way too POOR to be out here defending millionaire and billionaire politicians. They literally do not care about you. You look silly and brainwashed.


Better? If not, oh well. 

It's just as unintelligent now as it was the first time. Where do you come up with these stereotypes? Do they just pop up in your head or do you parrot others? Since you couldn't understand my post, let me dumb it down for you:

What leads you to believe I'm poor? What leads you to believe I am defending rich people. What leads you to believe I am old. Name some indication I have given that leads you to these conclusions. Don't bother...everyone already knows the answers. Your only "skill" (ha ha) in debating/discussing topics is to throw out baseless stereotypes and personal insults. That must be why you hate Trump. Jealousy. He is so much better at it than you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Englebert said:

It's just as unintelligent now as it was the first time. Where do you come up with these stereotypes? Do they just pop up in your head or do you parrot others? Since you couldn't understand my post, let me dumb it down for you:

What leads you to believe I'm poor? What leads you to believe I am defending rich people. What leads you to believe I am old. Name some indication I have given that leads you to these conclusions. Don't bother...everyone already knows the answers. Your only "skill" (ha ha) in debating/discussing topics is to throw out baseless stereotypes and personal insults. That must be why you hate Trump. Jealousy. He is so much better at it than you.

Exhibit #9174727

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Since you asked.. I’ll DUMB it down for you. 

 

You are way too POOR to be out here defending millionaire and billionaire politicians. They literally do not care about you. You look silly and brainwashed.


Better? If not, oh well. 

Everything you post is dumbed down, no need to put in extra work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's get this one back on topic.  I'm trying to be patient because I think it's good for the site to have some back and forth, but when it devolves into this sort of thing it defeats the purpose.  As I said a while back I'll start issuing warnings if I need to.  There's nothing that's overly offensive here, but you guys certainly aren't following site rules with this conversation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2021 at 2:52 PM, InMAGAWeTrust said:

You are way too POOR to be out here defending millionaire and billionaire politicians. They literally do not care about you.

Isn’t that about the same for ALL politicians? Even if they start out with good intentions, they become twisted and self serving before it’s all said and done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

Isn’t that about the same for ALL politicians? Even if they start out with good intentions, they become twisted and self serving before it’s all said and done. 

You know as well as I, that Trump is not a politician.  This is why he tried to do the right thing.  This is why I trust him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

You know as well as I, that Trump is not a politician.  This is why he tried to do the right thing.  This is why I trust him!

It’s not money for him. It’s power and notoriety and legacy. I voted for him, will continue to vote for him and believe that he can do better than most in the arena. I’m not a blind man though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

It’s not money for him. It’s power and notoriety and legacy. I voted for him, will continue to vote for him and believe that he can do better than most in the arena. I’m not a blind man though. 

No doubt he is better than most!!  Look where we were before the Dims took control.  biden started the downward spiral his first day in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...