Jump to content

New York man allegedly assaults 83-year-old man, dumps soda on his head


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, baddog said:

Good dodge. Blame the subject matter on me instead of calling the perp a big, fat punk. George Floyd was a racist topic and it got everyone “going”.

Who was it started by? It got the usuals going. I have no problem calling this dude a punk. Like I said I’ve seen the worst from all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Who was it started by? It got the usuals going. I have no problem calling this dude a punk. Like I said I’ve seen the worst from all.

Not sure what you mean by that...my point was that New Yorkers (folks up north in general) seem to stand by and allow this kind of crap from punks like this rather than step in and stop it which would most likely happen in the great state of Texas, or the south in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Who was it started by? It got the usuals going. I have no problem calling this dude a punk. Like I said I’ve seen the worst from all.

I have to agree with PAMFAM10

 

We have to stop judging one incident and putting it on an entire race or community.  If this dude was black, fine, but he does not represent the black community.....  I mean, it was not THAT long ago a few white dudes drug a black man to his death in Jasper. He did not represent me for dang sure......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

I have to agree with PAMFAM10

 

We have to stop judging one incident and putting it on an entire race or community.  If this dude was black, fine, but he does not represent the black community.....  I mean, it was not THAT long ago a few white dudes drug a black man to his death in Jasper. He did not represent me for dang sure......

Agree, they did not represent me either and I called for their heads. This would be the point I try to make. Chauvin did not represent me either and I denounced his actions too. His attack brought on a lot of anti-white sentiment that I don’t deserve and I have had my fill. I never see any person of color on here jump in and denounce their actions, even though Pamfam did after some prodding. Blacks can create their own “movements” against whites, cops, anyone who they think has wronged them. I am simply trying to stand up for my race. I am sure I will be called a racist for my actions but what else is new?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, baddog said:

Agree, they did not represent me either and I called for their heads. This would be the point I try to make. Chauvin did not represent me either and I denounced his actions too. His attack brought on a lot of anti-white sentiment that I don’t deserve and I have had my fill. I never see any person of color on here jump in and denounce their actions, even though Pamfam did after some prodding. Blacks can create their own “movements” against whites, cops, anyone who they think has wronged them. I am simply trying to stand up for my race. I am sure I will be called a racist for my actions but what else is new?

I can only speak for me. After running a very successful discussions page on Facebook with over 4000 members, I have come to a couple conclusions. 

1.  To have a conversation, you must listen to the other person, and race conversations always become negative because both sides spend majority of time trying to win versus trying to listen.... Plus both sides are very passionate about the subject. 

2.   We live in a climate that if you disagree, you must hate. If you don't agree with the gay lifestyle, you are  automatically deemed homophobic......If you don't agree with BLM, you're racist.......so, most sensible folks  just elect to not comment or engage in conversation out of fear of being labeled. 

So, I'm very careful in what and how I comment on things.  You can stand up for your race but be prepared to be challenged every time and ask yourself if it's worth it. I know, for me, it's not worth it. 

I have found that REAL life is much different that "internet" life. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This may have been her dog….lmao  
    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...