Jump to content

The Art Of The Steal!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Realville said:

My money is still on Trump. 

Laugh if you want, but you may not be laughing for long.

Just curious.... at what point will you accept that Trump is no longer the President?

When Joe is sworn in?

When Trump no longer lives at 1600 Pennsylvania?

If Trump ever gives a concession speech?

Or are you just gonna keep pretending?  

He was literally talking about declaring martial law over the weekend.  As somebody that voted for him twice, he's about to officially be the worst president that we've ever had, just because of the way that he's behaved since he lost. And "Americans" are still supporting the guy. It's mindblowing. 

This is the hidden content, please

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Just curious.... at what point will you accept that Trump is no longer the President?

When Joe is sworn in?

When Trump no longer lives at 1600 Pennsylvania?

If Trump ever gives a concession speech?

Or are you just gonna keep pretending?  

He was literally talking about declaring martial law over the weekend.  As somebody that voted for him twice, he's about to officially be the worst president that we've ever had, just because of the way that he's behaved since he lost. And "Americans" are still supporting the guy. It's mindblowing. 

This is the hidden content, please

 

Just my opinion. You don’t have to agree with it. Your posting statements from the same people that said he was a Russian spy. How’d that work out? Remember people thought he was crazy when he said his campaign was spied on by the FBI. Sure enough he was right along with many other things. Have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Just curious.... at what point will you accept that Trump is no longer the President?

When Joe is sworn in?

When Trump no longer lives at 1600 Pennsylvania?

If Trump ever gives a concession speech?

Or are you just gonna keep pretending?  

He was literally talking about declaring martial law over the weekend.  As somebody that voted for him twice, he's about to officially be the worst president that we've ever had, just because of the way that he's behaved since he lost. And "Americans" are still supporting the guy. It's mindblowing. 

This is the hidden content, please

 


There goes your martial law fake news. Nice try. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Just curious.... at what point will you accept that Trump is no longer the President?

When Joe is sworn in?

When Trump no longer lives at 1600 Pennsylvania?

If Trump ever gives a concession speech?

Or are you just gonna keep pretending?  

He was literally talking about declaring martial law over the weekend.  As somebody that voted for him twice, he's about to officially be the worst president that we've ever had, just because of the way that he's behaved since he lost. And "Americans" are still supporting the guy. It's mindblowing. 

This is the hidden content, please
 

I’ll tell you what. When the swing states allow signature verification of the ballots in counties where there were huge abnormalities and a forensic audit of the machines in those counties then I’ll move on. There’s a reason why it’s not being allowed, because they know they will find enough fraud to over turn the election. Zero of the cases filed with courts have been allowed to show evidence. If there is nothing to hide then why all the suppression and push back. Let the evidence be presented. I’ve watched the hearings and listen to sworn testimony of witnesses that was given to State legislators in these swing states which was not a court setting. None of the major news outlets covered it but they covered the phony Russia hearings for 3 plus years with no substantial evidence. I had to watch it livestream from a very small news outlet. All witnesses signed sworn affidavits with penalty of perjury. Meaning prison time for lying. Currently they’re thousands of sworn affidavits that were given to Trumps legal team. The evidence is overwhelming. It actually pisses you off when you listen and watch the testimonies. Certainly enough to investigate the ballots and machines. Many justices and judges are afraid of the repercussions of hearing or ruling on the evidence because of the threats to them and their family. Typical Democrat Bully tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Just curious.... at what point will you accept that Trump is no longer the President?

When Joe is sworn in?

When Trump no longer lives at 1600 Pennsylvania?

If Trump ever gives a concession speech?

Or are you just gonna keep pretending?  

He was literally talking about declaring martial law over the weekend.  As somebody that voted for him twice, he's about to officially be the worst president that we've ever had, just because of the way that he's behaved since he lost. And "Americans" are still supporting the guy. It's mindblowing. 

This is the hidden content, please

 

The ATlantic was also the publication that "declared" that President Trump called our soldiers losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

The ATlantic was also the publication that "declared" that President Trump called our soldiers losers.

Well, he did call a five year POW a loser... among other things, living and posthumously.  I saw that with my own eyes.  

Just last week he was still tweeting crap about McCain, and he's been dead for two years. 

This is the hidden content, please

And he wonders why he got his tail kicked in Arizona. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Realville said:

I’ll tell you what. When the swing states allow signature verification of the ballots in counties where there were huge abnormalities and a forensic audit of the machines in those counties then I’ll move on. There’s a reason why it’s not being allowed, because they know they will find enough fraud to over turn the election. Zero of the cases filed with courts have been allowed to show evidence. If there is nothing to hide then why all the suppression and push back. Let the evidence be presented. I’ve watched the hearings and listen to sworn testimony of witnesses that was given to State legislators in these swing states which was not a court setting. None of the major news outlets covered it but they covered the phony Russia hearings for 3 plus years with no substantial evidence. I had to watch it livestream from a very small news outlet. All witnesses signed sworn affidavits with penalty of perjury. Meaning prison time for lying. Currently they’re thousands of sworn affidavits that were given to Trumps legal team. The evidence is overwhelming. It actually pisses you off when you listen and watch the testimonies. Certainly enough to investigate the ballots and machines. Many justices and judges are afraid of the repercussions of hearing or ruling on the evidence because of the threats to them and their family. Typical Democrat Bully tactics.

They weren't allowed, or had none to show.  Just because YOUR news says that those affidavits exist, doesn't mean that they do.  If they're sworn, certainly a few hundred have been leaked, right?  Maybe a few dozen, at least?  Or maybe none at all, except for that truck driver who brought 74,000 ballots from NY to PA, then admitted that he'd lied.  

This is the hidden content, please

These are the people that provided your "thousands and thousands" of affidavits.  Liars. Each and every one of them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

They weren't allowed, or had none to show.  Just because YOUR news says that those affidavits exist, doesn't mean that they do.  If they're sworn, certainly a few hundred have been leaked, right?  Maybe a few dozen, at least?  Or maybe none at all, except for that truck driver who brought 74,000 ballots from NY to PA, then admitted that he'd lied.  

This is the hidden content, please

These are the people that provided your "thousands and thousands" of affidavits.  Liars. Each and every one of them.  

Click on the above link sidneypowell.com an you can see all the filings for the Supreme Court. She has them broken down in states. She has 234 pages affidavits for just Michigan. You really need to find a better source for truth because you are lost as a goose.

Here is that postal worker in his own words that he did not recant his allegations.

If you need some good sources to some truth just let me know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Realville said:

Click on the above link sidneypowell.com an you can see all the filings for the Supreme Court. She has them broken down in states. She has 234 pages affidavits for just Michigan. You really need to find a better source for truth because you are lost as a goose.

Here is that postal worker in his own words that he did not recant his allegations.

If you need some good sources to some truth just let me know. 

Only problem is, he recanted again. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

That’s the problem.  You guys are grasping at straws and will literally believe ANYTHING that gives you hope that your Savior can somehow pull this out. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were you watching your news source today when they clarified their stance on voting machines?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Newsmax officially announced that they have seen zero evidence of voting machine related fraud. That, my friend, is called “cya” when you’ve been busy spreading wild speculations, tall tales, hearsay, and absolute lies. 
 

Isnt this where all of Trump’s loyalist went when those traitors at fox called the race for Biden?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

They weren't allowed, or had none to show.  Just because YOUR news says that those affidavits exist, doesn't mean that they do.  If they're sworn, certainly a few hundred have been leaked, right?  Maybe a few dozen, at least?  Or maybe none at all, except for that truck driver who brought 74,000 ballots from NY to PA, then admitted that he'd lied.  

This is the hidden content, please

These are the people that provided your "thousands and thousands" of affidavits.  Liars. Each and every one of them.  

I actually heard Rudy Giuliani say there many, many signed, under Penalty Of Perjury, affidavits!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Were you watching your news source today when they clarified their stance on voting machines?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Newsmax officially announced that they have seen zero evidence of voting machine related fraud. That, my friend, is called “cya” when you’ve been busy spreading wild speculations, tall tales, hearsay, and absolute lies. 
 

Isnt this where all of Trump’s loyalist went when those traitors at fox called the race for Biden?

Explain this video!  Is this just another walk in the park?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Were you watching your news source today when they clarified their stance on voting machines?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Newsmax officially announced that they have seen zero evidence of voting machine related fraud. That, my friend, is called “cya” when you’ve been busy spreading wild speculations, tall tales, hearsay, and absolute lies. 
 

Isnt this where all of Trump’s loyalist went when those traitors at fox called the race for Biden?

That may be newsmax’s view but not the view of the guest they’ve had on their program that have actually seen the evidence. Believe what you want CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...