Jump to content

Bridge City ineligible player ???


WO-S 89

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

The district will be releasing a statement to media today on the outcome of the ruling on Bridge City baseball. Until then no comments on the matter can be made.

What the hell does that mean? No comments can be made? By who? Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

The UIL District 22-4A Executive committee has ruled that

This is the hidden content, please
unintentionaly used an ineligible player. Bridge City will forfeit 3 varsity and 2 JV games this season as a result.

D48tG-fWsAEnbfR.jpg
D48tG-fWsAEnbfR.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

Bridge City will forfeit wins over Silsbee, Hardin-Jefferson and LCM

 
 
 
 
 
 

With that info, my calculations of the current standings are as follows:

Hardin-Jefferon: 11-1

Little Cypress-Mauriceville: 9-2

Bridge City: 7-4

Silsbee: 6-5

Hamshire-Fannett: 4-7

Lumberton: 1-10

West Orange-Stark: 1-10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

With that info, my calculations of the current standings are as follows:

Hardin-Jefferon: 11-1

Little Cypress-Mauriceville: 9-2

Bridge City: 7-4

Silsbee: 5-6

Hamshire-Fannett: 4-7

Lumberton: 1-10

West Orange-Stark: 1-10

I guess my source was right. That put LCM with clean sweep of the dirty birds lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

With that info, my calculations of the current standings are as follows:

Hardin-Jefferon: 11-1

Little Cypress-Mauriceville: 9-2

Bridge City: 7-4

Silsbee: 5-6

Hamshire-Fannett: 4-7

Lumberton: 1-10

West Orange-Stark: 1-10

Ashly posted these standings:

UPDATED 22-4A STANDINGS 1. Hardin-Jefferson (11-1) 2. LCM (9-2) 3. Bridge City (7-4) 4. Silsbee (6-5) 5. Hamshire-Fannett (4-7) 6. West Orange-Stark (1-10) 6. Lumberton (1-10)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Ashly posted these standings:

UPDATED 22-4A STANDINGS 1. Hardin-Jefferson (11-1) 2. LCM (9-2) 3. Bridge City (7-4) 4. Silsbee (6-5) 5. Hamshire-Fannett (4-7) 6. West Orange-Stark (1-10) 6. Lumberton (1-10)

Actually, Ashly's is correct.  I forgot to change Silsbee's record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    fasedo9317
    Newest Member
    fasedo9317
    Joined



  • Posts

    • He actually had a pretty solid year for a sophomore starting in that district. I can assure you, it hasn't hurt his recruiting at all and that will only improve with the move back to the Wack. 
    • If Crumedy eventually has bigger aspirations than being in Jasper, every aspect of the program will be looked at when someone interviews him for any job. He knows that. The mindset needs to be that any time someone wears a Jasper uniform, that they're doing everything they possibly can to win. It matters.
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up It's a poll but I could definitely see this as realistic.   From the article: Catholics in the United States have swung dramatically against President Biden in recent years, now boasting a significant statistical break towards his GOP challenger. Pew Research released on Apr. 30 a report exploring support for presidential candidates sorted by religious affiliation. The poll found that 55% of Catholics support or lean towards supporting former President Donald Trump in a head-to-head against Biden. Conversely, only 45% of Catholics support Biden in the same one-on-one pairing. The 12% margin of support in favor of Trump marks a significant shift from 2020, when he held an extremely narrow lead — 50% to 49%. Biden currently leads among Hispanic Catholics with a narrow 49%-47% split, but the close contest marks a major shift rightward for the demographic. In 2020, a similar poll from Pew Research found Hispanic Catholics preferred Biden to Trump with a staggering 67%-26% split.
    • You said a lot there. Truthfully, that is the root of the issue. Who cares what a kid thinks about how coaches are running a program? Kids play, coaches coach. For some reason, parents have this backward in a lot of places and its wreaking havoc. 
    • He's already stated he's a huge Clinton fan.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...