Jump to content

Beaumont West Brook Bruins vs Strake Jesuit Crusaders 2.0


Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, ECBucFan said:

Dumb question maybe but why is a Catholic private school in the UIL playoffs? When did this change?  

I could be wrong but both Dallas and Houston Jesuit have been in the UIL since 2010 re-alignment.  And since they have no attendance zone, they are in the largest classification no matter their enrollment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Austin1985 said:

I could be wrong but both Dallas and Houston Jesuit have been in the UIL since 2010 re-alignment.  And since they have no attendance zone, they are in the largest classification no matter their enrollment

100% correct. They petitioned to be in UIL knowing that they would have to play in 6A with a lower enrollment.

My question is, why aren't they classified 6A DI? I thought they had to play in highest enrollment class and division?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

100% correct. They petitioned to be in UIL knowing that they would have to play in 6A with a lower enrollment.

My question is, why aren't they classified 6A DI? I thought they had to play in highest enrollment class and division?

I was told just highest enrollment class, Didn’t matter about division 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Austin1985 said:

I could be wrong but both Dallas and Houston Jesuit have been in the UIL since 2010 re-alignment.  And since they have no attendance zone, they are in the largest classification no matter their enrollment

 

Strake has played in UIL 6A formerly 5A since the late 90s when they were banned from TAPPS. 

Dallas Jesuit has also been banned from TAPPS and been playing in UIL since 2004 if not slightly earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're all wrong to some extent. Both Strake Jesuit and Dallas Jesuit were the first private schools allowed to join the UIL in 2004. They competed in the TCIL until it ceased to exist in 2000. Both schools played as independent schools from 2000-2003 as TAPPS refused to allow them in due to having too large of an enrollment compared to all other private schools in the state and the UIL refused them due to having neither restrictions on recruiting nor a geographically specified attendance zone. They petitioned the UIL and were allowed in starting with the 2004 season but they are required to play in the largest classification. Since 6A doesn't divide into a division 1 and division 2 until the playoffs they are allowed to play in the division 2 playoff bracket if they qualify as they had to compete with larger schools in district competition during the regular season.

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Goblin said:

You're all wrong to some extent. Both Strake Jesuit and Dallas Jesuit were the first private schools allowed to join the UIL in 2004. They competed in the TCIL until it ceased to exist in 2000. Both schools played as independent schools from 2000-2003 as TAPPS refused to allow them in due to having too large of an enrollment compared to all other private schools in the state and the UIL refused them due to having neither restrictions on recruiting nor a geographically specified attendance zone. They petitioned the UIL and were allowed in starting with the 2004 season but they are required to play in the largest classification. Since 6A doesn't divide into a division 1 and division 2 until the playoffs they are allowed to play in the division 2 playoff bracket if they qualify as they had to compete with larger schools in district competition during the regular season.

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

Okay, I got the date wrong but the bottom line is, since they have no attendance zones, they have to compete in the largest classification.  At 1st, they had to play Katy ISD schools for a while.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

Yes

Ok, so they have seen him before. I was thinking Yeoman started. My next question is, is Peevey planning on throwing the entire kitchen, not just the kitchen sink, at them? I feel like we're going to have to run every trick play, flea flicker, halfback pass, double reverse, statue of liberty play, and everything else to catch SJ off guard, to have a chance to win. We need to pull out all the stops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

Ok, so they have seen him before. I was thinking Yeoman started. My next question is, is Peevey planning on throwing the entire kitchen, not just the kitchen sink, at them? I feel like we're going to have to run every trick play, flea flicker, halfback pass, double reverse, statue of liberty play, and everything else to catch SJ off guard, to have a chance to win. We need to pull out all the stops. 

That I do not know.   But I would believe so no sense in saving anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 82 5A State Champs said:

Ok, so they have seen him before. I was thinking Yeoman started. My next question is, is Peevey planning on throwing the entire kitchen, not just the kitchen sink, at them? I feel like we're going to have to run every trick play, flea flicker, halfback pass, double reverse, statue of liberty play, and everything else to catch SJ off guard, to have a chance to win. We need to pull out all the stops. 

Scoring points won't be an issue. Whether the defensive game plan stays aggressive and get some stops will determine the outcome. I think the Bruins pull out a win here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,987
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: In the days since Hunter Biden's laptop was entered into evidence in his Delaware gun trial, Republican lawmakers have called out the 51 intelligence officials who originally cast doubt on its authenticity before the 2020 election. "I think there needs to be an investigation into every single one of them," Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., told the Daily Mail during congressional baseball practice. "We know that the intel community never operates in absolutes, and the fact that we had 51 come forward and try to put forward a narrative that this was disinformation, misinformation, when everyone knew full well that it wasn't — that it was very real — that speaks volumes about the politicization and the weaponization of the DOJ [Department of Justice] and the IC [intelligence community]." Cammack also said their security clearances need to be revoked. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., echoed his fellow Floridian, saying the 51 intel officers who originally deemed the laptop "Russian disinformation" should face consequences. "100%, absolutely there should be repercussions for that," Steube told the Mail. "That's what the American people are frustrated and tired about, is they see all of these people doing all these horrible things, using the deep state to go after Trump and Russia-gate and Russia collusion," he said. "It was all a lie. "And none of these people have been held accountable," he continued. "So, if any of them are still working in government, they should all lose their jobs and then be sued if there's some type of cause that you can go after them for.
    • Please post the quotes where I said our athletes are better than yours and I will apologize 
    • Wow, congrats to Coach Erickson. Complete changes across the board for boys athletics in Orangefield the last year or so. 
    • That team underachieved. Had the returning offensive MVP of the District along with 2 other 1st team all-district players. Finished 4th. He had a more talented/experienced team than the previous year and the team got worse. The reason I didn't like the hire in the beginning was his 6-51 coaching record prior to getting the job. I know records aren't the only thing to judge a coach on, but 6-51 is absolutely horrific. 
    • I don’t think they have qualified for state 7 on 7 yet but I could be wrong… 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...