Jump to content

All district awards


MoFo

Recommended Posts

On 12/23/2017 at 10:17 AM, MoFo said:

I can remember a time when the all district awards meant something. I know what you're thinking Mofo is butt hurt. Actually just the opposite my son is on the list and he and I both know he shouldn't be. He had 2 receptions during regular season. Bring back the days when these awards were an honor to receive. 

I’m in the same boat kinda.  I don’t mind the Honorable Mention part.  But it should be. My boy got HM in district 21-6A but so did a bunch of others that in my eyes took what ever meaning it had away. I already knew 1st or second team was gonna be a reach in our district with him being only a sophomore.

22 1st team 

22 2nd 

22 or less HM’s 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, GCM-RG74-WR8 said:

I’m in the same boat kinda.  I don’t mind the Honorable Mention part.  But it should be. My boy got HM in district 21-6A but so did a bunch of others that in my eyes took what ever meaning it had away. I already knew 1st or second team was gonna be a reach in our district with him being only a sophomore.

22 1st team 

22 2nd 

22 or less HM’s 

I agree.  Last year, my Son got honorable mention, this year, First team all defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MoFo said:

Pick 11 for offense, 11 for defense for both 1st and 2nd team. Make the award mean something again. You can put as many as you want on honorable mention list 

But wouldn't some players get short changed?  You want 11 players both sides.  Ok, cool.  What do you want?  4 D linemen, 3 linebackers, 2 CB's, 2 Safeties?

Offense, 1 QB, 2 RB's, 2 WR's, 1 TE, and 5 o-linemen?  Ok, what do you do with teams that run 5-2 defenses?  3-4 defenses? 3-3-5?  Nickel?  Dime?  I'm offense, you have wing-t that have No WRs...  You have teams that run spread with 4 wr's, 1 rb, no TE? Still 11 on both sides?  And some districts you have all spread teams.  Some districts, you have majority wing-t or slot - t teams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

But wouldn't some players get short changed?  You want 11 players both sides.  Ok, cool.  What do you want?  4 D linemen, 3 linebackers, 2 CB's, 2 Safeties?

Offense, 1 QB, 2 RB's, 2 WR's, 1 TE, and 5 o-linemen?  Ok, what do you do with teams that run 5-2 defenses?  3-4 defenses? 3-3-5?  Nickel?  Dime?  I'm offense, you have wing-t that have No WRs...  You have teams that run spread with 4 wr's, 1 rb, no TE? Still 11 on both sides?  And some districts you have all spread teams.  Some districts, you have majority wing-t or slot - t teams...

I get your point, but something needs to be done. These awards have become a joke. My son told me a baseball kid made it last year that only played in 2 games.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MoFo said:

I get your point, but something needs to be done. These awards have become a joke. My son told me a baseball kid made it last year that only played in 2 games.... 

District 21-5A has 18 kids on 1st team & 20 kids on 2nd team. I think that's fair for a district with 9 teams. I don't think that's watered down.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Well, the ones who are upset by this are the same ones who can’t define a woman. There was another woman who everybody came down on for hunting. We are a nation of the offended.  
    • For what it’s worth, polling after this came out show her with an 81% disapproval rating.  Only 21% of republicans said she’d be a good choice for veep, and only 28% of self-identified “very conservative” voters said she’s a good option.  Bragging about killing a dog apparently resonates poorly across political affiliations.  
    • They don’t, and they won’t.  May not be an issue in South Dakota, but certainly is on the national stage.  Even my mother in law, who strictly watches OAN and thinks Trump is a great guy who’s never committed a crime in his life is completely disgusted by this.  I know about bad dogs, and don’t have an issue with what she did,  and I’m sure most of us on here agree.  But as is often this case, it’s not going to be our opinions that decide this election.  I thought she might be a valuable running mate that could bring in the female vote, but I’m hoping Trump has the sense to stay away from her now.  
    • I like the approach, here it is, if you don’t like it don’t vote for me, it’s refreshing to see the Ronald Reagan approach. Not every statement needs to be based on a perceived reaction from folks. Don’t think for a minute democrats didn’t have this knowledge, just not the right time to use it, remember Romney and the dog carrier, they knew.  
    • The year after he left DC spell had them boys physical… beat Roschon Johnson and the Indians at home. They were roughing him up all night long. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...