Jump to content

Don’t look now but someone’s pants are on fire...


TxHoops

Recommended Posts

BRIAN ROSS GOT IT WRONG: ABC NEWS Forced To Issue Retraction On Flynn Bombshell

Today’s bombshell from Brian Ross has been retracted by ABC News….

CORRECTION of ABC News Special Report: Flynn prepared to testify that President-elect Donald Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians *during the transition* — initially as a way to work together to fight ISIS in Syria, confidant now says.

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

— ABC News (@ABC)

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Reagan said:

BRIAN ROSS GOT IT WRONG: ABC NEWS Forced To Issue Retraction On Flynn Bombshell

Today’s bombshell from Brian Ross has been retracted by ABC News….

CORRECTION of ABC News Special Report: Flynn prepared to testify that President-elect Donald Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians *during the transition* — initially as a way to work together to fight ISIS in Syria, confidant now says.

This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

— ABC News (@ABC)

This is the hidden content, please

ABC News suspends Brian Ross over 'serious error' in Trump-Flynn report
This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's pathetic, for most of my life the FBI was thought by many of us, to be neutral politically.  Were we naive?  Either way, it's not now.  Appears to be a political wing of the Democratic Party.  Between the Federal Judges we have who's opinions supersede the Constitution, and now the FBI, the Judicial branch of Govt. is no longer blindfolded, but has been taken over by The DNC.  As baddog said, we have investigators investigating the investigators.  And, as in many things you find wrong, no doubt this is just the tip of the iceberg.  Untouchables?  Not anymore.  They should be renamed Gestapo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

Thoughts

Michael Flynn lied to the FBI and has been charge with that crime. That's all we know. I've heard two theories on this.

One, this is a sign that the special prosecutor has nothing and could only muster this charge. If he had anything more significant he would have charged Flynn with the greater crime.

Or second, Flynn cut a deal with the prosecutor, agreeing to plead guilty to a lesser charge and other charges dropped, in exchange for testimony implicating someone else.

Or third, Flynn is guilty as sin, but has dirt on Mueller, thus Mueller agreed to just charge him with only lying to avoid Flynn spilling the beans on him.

What are your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
    • 21-6A Humble Kingwood- 3 Pasadena Memorial-2   17-5A Barbers Hill- 2 Angleton- 1
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...