Jump to content

Carthage 64 Silsbee 36/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

The Silsbee Tigers look to take one more step toward a Class 4A, Division I state championship as they take on the Carthage Bulldogs tonight in this Region III semifinal.  Randy Smith's Tigers, 7-4 on the season, reached this round with a 37-17 win over Center and a 52-21 area round win over Bay City.  Meanwhile, Scott Surratt's Bulldogs, 12-0 on the season and District 9-4A-I district champs, reached this round with a 46-10 bi-district win over 46-10 Huffman Hargrave and a 45-21 area round win over Brazosport.

Join Tim Scoggins for all of the action from Abe Martin Stadium in Lufkin with the Eastex Credit Union Pregame Show at 7:15 followed by the kickoff at 7:30 pm by clicking on the following Cube player:

This is the hidden content, please

Follow Silsbee Tiger Playoff Football on Your Source for Sports in Southeast Texas, SETXsports.com!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Need some near flawless execution in all 3 phases of the game, Special teams, Offense, and Defense.  Should be treated as the biggest game in Tiger history.  

There has been a lot of history in Tiger football. Maybe not the biggest game, but right up there with the biggest games in Tiger history. 1977 Silsbee v Dickenson State Semi-Finals, 1983 #8 Silsbee v #1 Lincoln: Silsbee homecoming, 1998 Silsbee v #2 WOS Bi-District, 1998 Silsbee v #1 La Marque State Quarter Finals, 2015 Silsbee v Carthage State Quarter Finals. Just to name a few that I think should be the biggest games in Tiger history. I'm looking for a Silsbee/Carthage game like last year, where it will be a fight all game long and will come down to the final minutes of the game. TigerNation!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined



  • Posts

    • From the article:   "In some ways, the dispute over the 2000 presidential election will never end. Witness Vice President Biden's comments Wednesday about predecessor Al Gore. "This man was elected president of the United States of America," Biden said at a fundraiser that Gore also attended. "No, no, no. He was elected president of the United States of America." WOW!!  And no one was indicted for questioning the results an this election.  Amazing how times have changed.   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl  @UT alum  @CardinalBacker  @Boyz N Da Hood         What say you?!
    • What you are failing to realize is this….. you act as if the only reason this person committed this heinous crime is because of bump stocks. My realization is that he would have done it anyway. Bump stocks did not create this crime, he did. You need to learn where that line really is. 
    • If you want bump stocks banned, you are going to need Congress.
    • This is my point, made initially.   We, as gun owners, should demand accountability from those who manufacture and sell these things.  But instead we argue "but it's our RIGHT to own them," thereby insuring that another mass killing happens in the future.  At which point in time we'll wring our hands, offer thoughts and prayers, say how it's not a gun that kills, but rather a hard heart that kills.     Gun manufacturers and sellers don't mind threats from people who were never going to buy from them anyways.  If actual gun owners were to threaten a boycott of businesses that produce/sell bump stocks, they'd disappear from the market.  But instead we take the losing side of an argument on philosophical grounds.   We don't need the feds with more regulations or congress to pass new legislation... we, as consumers control the market.  What's available, etc.   WE, as the actual customers of weapons should be using our voices to determine what is produced/sold by the gun industry.  
    • This is insane. What a waste of a football career for this young man. A sophomore and has already run away from two situations where he could compete for the job. Unfortunate, because I heard they were high on him in BH, but it's unreasonable to think a school like BH would designate a Sophomore as their starter in the Spring of his Freshman year. Pitiful. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...