Jump to content

House Intelligence Chairman Said Trump Transition Team Was Surveilled


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

I've repeatedly said, Comey can only speak for the FBI.  He has no idea if the Secret Service, or any of the 16 of our Govt intelligence agencies might have spied on Trump or his people.  A fact that all the media, including Fox, seems to forget.  I'll bet we haven't heard the last of this fiasco.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, baddog said:

I posted this under Trump makes stuff up, but maybe it deserves its own thread.

Lol, I posted a whole new thread on it last night.  Well, our heart was in the right place.  Thought I'd add this reminder.

This is the hidden content, please

 

PS;  I'll see if I can get mine deleted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, REBgp said:

I've repeatedly said, Comey can only speak for the FBI.  He has no idea if the Secret Service, or any of the 16 of our Govt intelligence agencies might have spied on Trump or his people.  A fact that all the media, including Fox, seems to forget.  I'll bet we haven't heard the last of this fiasco.

This is the hidden content, please

Shiff is yet another in a long list of crybabies.....wahhhhhh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

But I thought you were SURE  he was lying.

It probably won't be the last thing you're wrong about him on.

Come on...man up and apologize to your President. 

Obama didn't order any wiretaps like he claimed.  Walmart voters crack me up.  They think they understand stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Obama didn't order any wiretaps like he claimed.  Walmart voters crack me up.  They think they understand stuff

Enough of the semantics. Let's assume for a second that Trump was indeed surveilled(that looks quite possible). You can rest assured that falls in Obama's lap. Now, Obama's people are smart enough to do things in a manner to allow plausible deniability. But, this would not have happened without someone in the Obama administration approving it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, texanabroad said:

Enough of the semantics. Let's assume for a second that Trump was indeed surveilled(that looks quite possible). You can rest assured that falls in Obama's lap. Now, Obama's people are smart enough to do things in a manner to allow plausible deniability. But, this would not have happened without someone in the Obama administration approving it. 

 

Assume

trump 

surveillance 

 

 

no evidence that that trump was monitored.   Are there recordings of trump?   No.    Enough semantics 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. i stand by all three of those statements. With the recent report from Nunes and the previously leaked conversations, I think it is safe to assume that Trump admin were surveilled. I make no distinction in surveilling Trump or his chief advisors. Now, the reason of why they were surveilled is what is in question. Were they being probed in a criminal investigation, were they communicating with someone involved in a criminal investigation, or were they being surveilled for political motives. This, we shall see.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, texanabroad said:

Yes. i stand by all three of those statements. With the recent report from Nunes and the previously leaked conversations, I think it is safe to assume that Trump admin were surveilled. I make no distinction in surveilling Trump or his chief advisors. Now, the reason of why they were surveilled is what is in question. Were they being probed in a criminal investigation, were they communicating with someone involved in a criminal investigation, or were they being surveilled for political motives. This, we shall see.

 

Fair enough 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
    • @CardinalBacker   Wanted to get your thoughts on how Cohen did as Bragg's star witness..... My Take: The State spent two days acknowledging that Cohen lied all the time but now he has come clean,,,,,,,it took the defense (having same evidence state had), just a few hours to confirm Cohen lied to the current jury a couple days ago......  While I thought initially Trump would be found guilty due to venue, with best case a hung jury, there is now a pretty good chance he will be acquitted...... Thoughts anyone??   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...