Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 45 Kennedale 21/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, oldage football said:

wos - had no one  ejected CoachT brought one player out of the game for reacting to a severe facemask - which if you watch it-- I would have gone off to - he was brought to sideline and corrected.and went back to play

Wrong...34 and 39 were out of the game and begging pierce to go back in,they both finished the game on the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't it your defense that gave up the long runs to give good field position from the beginning?  You wouldn't have been pinned that deep.  

So you say the defense wasn't scored on...  So was the offense scored on? Which is it? 

Keep I'm mind I'm not being sarcastic, be you and I are discussing a serious question...

Quite obvious the offense was scored on. If defense messes up then offense has to recover from it and if the offense messes up defense needs to. Great win WOS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't it your defense that gave up the long runs to give good field position from the beginning?  You wouldn't have been pinned that deep.  

So you say the defense wasn't scored on...  So was the offense scored on? Which is it? 

Keep I'm mind I'm not being sarcastic, be you and I are discussing a serious question...

If I'm not mistaken it was turnovers that gave them that field position. But in my opinion and remember I'm a baseball guy, yes it would be the offense that gave up the points either way. The defense held them. It seems to me that if the other offense didn't score you can't say the defense gave up any points. Bend but don't break theory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't it your defense that gave up the long runs to give good field position from the beginning?  You wouldn't have been pinned that deep.  

So you say the defense wasn't scored on...  So was the offense scored on? Which is it? 

Keep I'm mind I'm not being sarcastic, be you and I are discussing a serious question...

How could the defense have been scored on if they weren't on the field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, td said:

If I'm not mistaken it was turnovers that gave them that field position. But in my opinion and remember I'm a baseball guy, yes it would be the offense that gave up the points either way. The defense held them. It seems to me that if the other offense didn't score you can't say the defense gave up any points. Bend but don't break theory. 

Understood...  Pretty good logic for a baseball guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, XX Man said:

I hope Cornel addresses the hole in the defensive line, that let the Silsbee guy through twice and now Kennedale twice.

It's not a hole !! Hoping u get a chance to rewatch both games even the BC game. All 3 teams got those yards bc our defense got lazy. LB not filling the holes either.  Especially the 2 runs by C.tyler ran through arm tackles.  And it's something they need to break.were not gonna always have this luxury of been up like this. The pursuit has been pour in every game this year in certain situations.  It's not abt the blowouts it's abt getting better for the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't it your defense that gave up the long runs to give good field position from the beginning?  You wouldn't have been pinned that deep.  

So you say the defense wasn't scored on...  So was the offense scored on? Which is it? 

Keep I'm mind I'm not being sarcastic, be you and I are discussing a serious question...

This is one of the more asinine statements that I have read on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see it a lot of people on here  that don't about sports or mabe it's just football you don't know  because u sit here talking the score instead of the win some of you thought we would be 5-1 or 4-2 by now sorry to disappoint you next since we didn't lose now yall sitting here  talking about we got scored on because you have nothing else talk about so u point fingers at that anything negative Im  just wondering why people thought we would lose this game or the bc game oh i know because everybody hates a winner but this not district is no lock we still have to play Mustang football 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SILVER AND BLACK said:

I see it a lot of people on here  that don't about sports or mabe it's just football you don't know  because u sit here talking the score instead of the win some of you thought we would be 5-1 or 4-2 by now sorry to disappoint you next since we didn't lose now yall sitting here  talking about we got scored on because you have nothing else talk about so u point fingers at that anything negative Im  just wondering why people thought we would lose this game or the bc game oh i know because everybody hates a winner but this not district is no lock we still have to play Mustang football 

Trust me, it's a lock.  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tennisbc said:

I agree with you, WOS you play the entire game like the 1st quarter. Just because you are winning big you still need to play with that same level of fire and heart. WOS will be fine and Coach T will remind them that you play 4 quarters until the game clock hits 0.00. Great win against a tough team.

Only problem for the players is Coach T's "reminding" is brutal. Lmao!!!!!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I said they would go 18 and 0 this that's with two pre-season game where they slap Vidor and png around but I never had a doubt about the last night or any of the others they were played but I am a bit surprised about the Scores I'm a defensive man I like 10 to 13 or 20 to 17 I wanna see a dogfight but wos keep letting me down on that dang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bronco pride said:

Damn WOS y'all only won by 24 pts. What's the world coming to. Lol. I can't wait to check out WOS the last week of the season against Liberty. What your team is doing this year is crazy. Kennedale was a very good team y'all made look average.

Lol!!!! I know!!! Many of us feel like we lost this morning because we got scored on.....let me rephrase that....SCORED ON! If that is the worst thing that happens to the Mustangs this year then they might have a pretty good team. Lol. I'm like TD, as long as we have more points when the clock hits 0:00, then I'm happy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kicker said:

Lol! TD may be sandbagging a little. Yes he may be a "baseball guy" but also has 2 kids on this team that are very important!!! Sorry, TD, had to. Haha

Trust me, td knows more about football than he shows on here. And he definitely knows more about football than most on here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, marshman said:

I've seen every game this year so far except the Kipp game and if there's one area of concern is the number of penalties. Yes some were undeserved, but they were called nevertheless. Especially against the offense. So far the offense has been explosive enough to overcome those penalties and still move the ball and put a lot of points up. I hope they can get those corrected, I would think by this point in the season they would have already been. I just hope somewhere down the road they don't have a game where ifs harder to overcome those penalties.

I hope you're right but we will have some close playoff games and won't be able to afford those kind of penalties. Gotta put a stop to that as we cruise through district. Things will get tight come playoff time. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ladybug33 said:

Last night while listening to the game, I never heard that a WO-S player was ejected from the game for throwing a punch. No wonder coach T. was blowing off steam. One point about the refs, they were moving the ball more than they should have for the Wildcats according to the Kogt broadcasters’ on certain plays. IMO I am glad the shutout is over. I’m glad we won, now we can focus on stopping the run up the middle, because, now teams will try to repeat that play over and over again. KJ had an awesome game last night, and hats off the Phillips for running down Knowles and catching him before he scored his first TD

 I heard there were 2 Unsportsmanlike Conduct on WOS. One of those must have been the punch. I never heard Stelly say anything about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...