Jump to content

Which?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, no-look said:

Would you rather have a 6' 10" athletic post or a 5' 10"  skilled point guard?  

A 6'10 athletic post HANDS DOWN. There are plenty of little ball handlers out there running around. The point guard doesn't have to be very skilled with that type of size. He just needs to feed the big fella. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Hudson several times last year. They had a point guard that made that team go. Some of you guys saw the Hudson / Silsbee game at the reg tourney. I believe Hudson had the lead at the half but just ran out of gas. Take him away and add the big post and Silsbee wins by thirty. Maybe the answer is to have both.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, no-look said:

I watched Hudson several times last year. They had a point guard that made that team go. Some of you guys saw the Hudson / Silsbee game at the reg tourney. I believe Hudson had the lead at the half but just ran out of gas. Take him away and add the big post and Silsbee wins by thirty. Maybe the answer is to have both.  

Yep. that red headed kid was all over the court last year. It depends on the scenario for me. To build the team, i'll take the 6'10 kid and we'll learn how to get better around him. As somebody else stated, you cant coach that size and if he's "athletic" with it, that's the icing on the cake. Nothing like having a good point guard that controls the offense and is a work horse on defense but that position in my opinion is far easier to "create" than having somebody who could potentially dominate the paint, boards, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, no-look said:

I watched Hudson several times last year. They had a point guard that made that team go. Some of you guys saw the Hudson / Silsbee game at the reg tourney. I believe Hudson had the lead at the half but just ran out of gas. Take him away and add the big post and Silsbee wins by thirty. Maybe the answer is to have both.  

Silsbee did end up winning by 20. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not very knowledgeable about basketball, but from what little I've watched of the pros, I've seen some Tall guys that didn't play well, but virtually no short guys that weren't good.  That Tall must count for something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...