Jump to content

2016-2018 Reclassification and Realignment will be released at 9a on Monday 2-1-16


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
14 minutes ago, ST413 said:

Regardless of whether or not Llano is west Texas or central Texas,. They have the same view I had which makes more sense, closer travel for district in a district that could use another school numbers wise.  I also notice no mention of Harmony Science.  

This is the hidden content, please

They aren't going to win. Besides Fredericksburg all of the schools in their proposed district are farther away. They just don't want to face those teams. The schools with the best shot of winning their appeals are Central, Lockhart, and Hays CISD. West Brook has an outside shot. The most difficult decision for UIL is going to be Alice and Calallen. Both schools want to be placed in a 9 team district because that district is much much closer. Problem is a district can't be more than 10 teams. As for the rest, haven't read much.

Harmony not appealing makes no sense, because they have the best shot of winning. Livingston being forced back to 5A would cause too many headaches for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do see the travel for llano may be a little better in the current lineup but not a whole lot a couple 1 1/2 hour trips in both but a 2 hour trip to Hondo. Now not sure they want to go near ATX traffic to get to Taylor though.  Could have made two 6 team districts to start with though instead of a 7 and a 5.  But they can't win setting these up anyway someone will always be upset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BlkMamba24 said:

So why isnt WB foorball moving into 21-6A with all other sports whats the reasoning behind that? 

Scheduling for non-district. Football scheduling is done first and more concrete with only one game a week, so any changes can cause a major ripple effect throughout the state. Livingston to 5A has created that in the Beaumont area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UIL released all district alignments yesterday and there have been changes relating to district 20, 21, and 22 5A.

Livingston will remain in 22-5A for all sports
Baytown Lee has been shifted over to 21-5A for all sports except football (they will remain in 22-5A for that)
Caney Creek has been shifted over to 20-5A for all sports except football (they will remain in 21-5A for that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...