Jump to content

SETXsports High School Football Rankings - Final


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

2015 HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL

RANKINGS-FINAL

 

6A-5A Poll

Rank, Team, Record, Points, Previous, Next Opponent

 

1.   Crosby (10), 10-0, 109, 1, 11/13 vs. Lumberton

2.   Galena Park North Shore (1), 7-3, 100, 2, 11/13 vs. Pasadena Dobie

3.   La Porte, 8-2, 87, 4, 11/13 vs. Pearland Dawson

4.   Sheldon C.E. King, 8-2, 71, 3,  11/12 vs. Beaumont Central

5.   Port Neches-Groves, 8-2, 56, 7, 11/13 vs. #5 Dayton

5.   Dayton, 7-3, 56, 6, 11/13 vs. #5 Port Neches-Groves

7.   Channelview, 7-3, 45, 5, 11/13 vs. Manvel

8.   Nederland, 7-3, 35, 9, 11/14 vs. #9 New Caney

9.   New Caney, 7-3, 27, 8, 11/14 vs. #8 Nederland

10. Beaumont West Brook, 6-4, 18, 11/13 vs. Pearland

 

4A-3A Poll

Rank, Team, Record, Points, Previous, Next Opponent

 

1.   West Orange-Stark (6), 9-1, 105, 2, 11/12 vs. Houston Scarborough

2.   Kirbyville (5), 9-1, 104, 3, 11/12 vs. Kemp

3.   Silsbee, 8-2, 87, 4, 11/13 vs. Tyler Chapel Hill

4.   East Chambers, 9-1, 78, 1, 11/12 vs. Palestine Westwood

5.   Jasper, 6-4, 56, 5, 11/14 vs. Brownsboro

6.  Coldspring-Oakhurst, 6-4, 45, 6, 11/12 vs. Groesbeck

6.  Newton, 6-4, 45, 7, 11/13 vs. Buffalo

8.   Bridge City, 7-3, 35, 8, 11/14 vs. Carthage

9.   Shepherd, 8-2, 28, 9, 11/12 vs. Mexia

10. Hamshire-Fannett, 7-3, 11, 10, 11/13 vs. Houston Kashmere

Others receiving votes: Huffman Hargrave 10, Crockett 1

 

2A-Private Poll

Rank, Team, Record, Points, Previous, Next Opponent

 

1.    Shelbyville (11), 9-0, 110, 1, 11/13 vs. Big Sandy

2.    Lovelady, 9-0, 98, 2, 11/12 vs. Cayuga

3.    Calvert, 10-0, 89, 3, 11/12 vs. Oakwood

4.    Chester, 9-0, 77, 5, 11/13 vs. Union Hill

5.    Beckville, 9-1, 65, 6, 11/12 vs. Union Grove

6.    Normangee, 8-2, 55, 7, 11/13 vs. Overton

7.    Beaumont Legacy Christian, 8-2, 42, 8, 11/13 vs. Temple Central Texas Christian

8.    Iola, 8-2, 36, 4, 11/12 vs. Timpson

9.    Evadale, 6-4, 21, 10, 11/12 vs. Maud

10.  Baytown Christian, 7-2, 11, 10, 1st Round Bye

Others receiving votes: Centerville 3

Edited by WOSgrad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirbyville got 5 first place votes.  One less than WOS.  One less overall point.  Squeaked past OF.  The 3rd place finisher in WOS district.  Same district that WOS moonwalked through handing out beatdowns like government cheese.  Lost to BC.  I appreciate the work you guys do.  I really do.  But c'mon man!  If all 5 of those votes weren't from Kirbyville residents, we are going to need to check your man cards....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirbyville got 5 first place votes.  One less than WOS.  One less overall point.  Squeaked past OF.  The 3rd place finisher in WOS district.  Same district that WOS moonwalked through handing out beatdowns like government cheese.  Lost to BC.  I appreciate the work you guys do.  I really do.  But c'mon man!  If all 5 of those votes weren't from Kirbyville residents, we are going to need to check your man cards....

Kirbyvilles 'woes' that you mentioned were the first 2 games of the year. I'd say we're not the same team as we were then. Go look at what we've done since. Also, WO-S did get blown out in their loss. (and don't give me that strength of opponent bull either. If you can't beat em, don't schedule them)  I say the rankings look fine. Quit whining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirbyvilles 'woes' that you mentioned were the first 2 games of the year. I'd say we're not the same team as we were then. Go look at what we've done since. Also, WO-S did get blown out in their loss. (and don't give me that strength of opponent bull either. If you can't beat em, don't schedule them)  I say the rankings look fine. Quit whining.

Bwahahahaha!!! You dont think WOS has gotten better? And Foster would have used Kirbyville as toilet paper. Come on Man!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kirbyvilles 'woes' that you mentioned were the first 2 games of the year. I'd say we're not the same team as we were then. Go look at what we've done since. Also, WO-S did get blown out in their loss. (and don't give me that strength of opponent bull either. If you can't beat em, don't schedule them)  I say the rankings look fine. Quit whining.

No one is whining.  It's just pretty funny to me that almost half the voters think Kirbyville is better.  But how about this one (although it involves the early season woes before the Cats began their improvement like no other team):

Kirbyville loses to Bridge City.  Bridge City loses to Silsbee by 20.  Silsbee loses to WOS by 21.  

No doubt Kirbyville had a great finish to the season and we all wish them luck in the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can do the same thing Alabama lost to Ole Miss and Memphis beat Ole Miss and so did Florida so I guess Memphis and Florida are better than Alabama?

No, to argue the reverse is like arguing Sam Houston is better than Alabama.  But that's just my opinion.  Maybe I'm the crazy one.  Just was shocking that apparently 5 out of 11 voters think Kirbyville could beat the Mustangs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, to argue the reverse is like arguing Sam Houston is better than Alabama.  But that's just my opinion.  Maybe I'm the crazy one.  Just was shocking that apparently 5 out of 11 voters think Kirbyville could beat the Mustangs. 

there lies the problem with the thinking of some folks about the poll. AAW has touched on it weekly. I reckon he's tired of explaining it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there lies the problem with the thinking of some folks about the poll. AAW has touched on it weekly. I reckon he's tired of explaining it. 

Yep, very tired. But to honor a close friend of mine, Juan Mo Time, the rankings are not necessarily about who would beat who in hypothetical games.

IMO, it's about performance, production, momentum, how a team has done in recent weeks, etc....... I do take into consideration actual head to head between two teams but only in recent weeks.

I will not rank a team in week 11, 12 based on what happened in week 1 or 2. Not going to happen for me. BTW, I have had WO-S #1 all year, even after their loss to Foster. But I have no problem with anyone ranking Kirbyville #1 after that impressive win over then #1 East Chambers.

Again, the poll shouldn't be about who would beat who when we are combining multiple classifications.

Crosby should be #1 (I had them #1 all year) based on their unbeaten performance this season. But even Crosby fans will tell you they wouldn't beat North Shore.

Edited by AggiesAreWe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our rankings have always ended after last week of regular season. Not sure the reason why it should carry on for just one week of playoffs.

Other than 21-5A playing 22-5A, all our other districts play districts outside our coverage area in 1st round.

So we should extend it one more week just so the 21-5A guys can say "I told you so"? smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I guess I'll have to chime in and throw a curve.  You guys keep complaining your ranking but.....

I like our ranking...nothing like Chester being included in the ranks with teams like Calvert.  Especially when just a couple months ago, we were being dogged on another forum thread for being the weakest in Division 1.   Cannot wait for the playoffs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I guess I'll have to chime in and throw a curve.  You guys keep complaining your ranking but.....

I like our ranking...nothing like Chester being included in the ranks with teams like Calvert.  Especially when just a couple months ago, we were being dogged on another forum thread for being the weakest in Division 1.   Cannot wait for the playoffs!

Saying the truth is not dogging. My comment was that District 15 and 16 are the weakest 2 districts in the state. That is still my belief. Calvert has 40 students and beat High Island with ease. Y'all beat High Island at home by 2. Calvert would be a 45 point favorite no matter where the location.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSgrad unpinned and pinned this topic
  • WOSgrad unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...