Jump to content

A Little Education...


smitty

Recommended Posts

When attempting to educate, it is helpful when the question you ask isn't premised on a term such as "raid," which is ambiguous as best. If you rephrase the question with more specificity, I will be glad to take a shot at the answer. For instance, had you asked under which president was social security created, I would have answered FDR. If you had asked under which president did social security annuities begin being taxed, I would have answered Reagan.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me boldly speak on Smittys behalf and ask you this way:  Which President was the first President to invade the Social Security fund?  If you still find that too ambiguous how about:  Which President was the first President to allow social security funds to be used for purposes other than social security benefits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When attempting to educate, it is helpful when the question you ask isn't premised on a term such as "raid," which is ambiguous as best. If you rephrase the question with more specificity, I will be glad to take a shot at the answer. For instance, had you asked under which president was social security created, I would have answered FDR. If you had asked under which president did social security annuities begin being taxed, I would have answered Reagan.

It becomes ambiguous when one knows the answer but don't want to say because it'll indict a socialist icon!   ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When attempting to educate, it is helpful when the question you ask isn't premised on a term such as "raid," which is ambiguous as best. If you rephrase the question with more specificity, I will be glad to take a shot at the answer. For instance, had you asked under which president was social security created, I would have answered FDR. If you had asked under which president did social security annuities begin being taxed, I would have answered Reagan.

Raid:  "An entrance into another's territory for the purpose of seizing goods or valuables."   And the education never stops! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, since you know the answer, why not provide it.? After all, an experienced educator such as you is smart enough to know the intent of a question.  We already know that a President has no authority to raid or invade the social security trust.    We also know that a President has no authority to lie about whether or not you can keep your healthcare plan if you like it.  That  lack of authorization did not stop it from happening. Under whose administration were social security funds first used for purposes other than social security benefits? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I assume that , from this point forward, unless a question is posed in a manner you find acceptable, you will not answer it or will that only happen if the answer is negative for the left?  If you believe that you can somehow portray, from a historical perspective, that the Dems are more fiscally responsible than the Republicans, you have the most ambitious task you have ever undertaken in your life and one that you will be unable to prove.  The dismal and well documented fiscal failure of the current administration will more than counter any historical examples you can provide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I assume that , from this point forward, unless a question is posed in a manner you find acceptable, you will not answer it or will that only happen if the answer is negative for the left? If you believe that you can somehow portray, from a historical perspective, that the Dems are more fiscally responsible than the Republicans, you have the most ambitious task you have ever undertaken in your life and one that you will be unable to prove. The dismal and well documented fiscal failure of the current administration will more than counter any historical examples you can provide.


You know what they say about "assuming." And come on Nash! You are a pro at avoiding answering questions when the answer doesn't suit your cause! You deflect like you're at the net with a 100 mph forehand coming at your head.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, your assumption why I haven't answered is off base. (See what I mean about assuming?). I really wanted you and/or Smitty to provide your answer(s). I can't decide if you know the correct answer or not. From one of smitty's comments, I lean toward he doesn't (but could easily be wrong). Then again, I guess there could be multiple correct answers to ambiguous questions; hence, the ambiguity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we are simply having a contest to see who can delay his response the longest? Please note that I asked permission to make the assumption. In the other thread where you accused me of avoiding your question, you were attempting to lead me in a certain direction because you were already armed with an answer you wanted to give. As previously stated, if you want to discuss the ills of the economy and who is or isnt responsible, I am more than willing )and very well armed) to discuss with you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As am I. Particularly with this question. And I am pretty confident that my answer will be different than yours. But I am more than willing to be educated. :)

As for the ills of the economy, you more than most knows there is no absolute blue print to a robust economy (much like the stock markets - as you well know). However, many of us have our opinions as to what is the best strategy to fostering a strong economy. I will be happy to share my opinion later when I have a little more time.

As for who is to blame for the ills, the correct answer is there is plenty of blame to go around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets start with this one. Since this recovery is the weakest rebound since World War II with GDP being about 1/2 of what any average recovery is, do you think it is fair to question the methodology of the current administration? Do you think that a country mired in more debt (as a percentage of GDP) than it has ever been, has any business being involved in projects such as Solyndra? Do you believe that the government is as efficient and productive in business efforts as the private markets?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, your assumption why I haven't answered is off base. (See what I mean about assuming?). I really wanted you and/or Smitty to provide your answer(s). I can't decide if you know the correct answer or not. From one of smitty's comments, I lean toward he doesn't (but could easily be wrong). Then again, I guess there could be multiple correct answers to ambiguous questions; hence, the ambiguity.

I know who AND why!    ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nash - yes, no, and depends.

Smitty - I think you think you know ;)

 

Sorry, the government has a well documented track record (regardless of party affiliation) of being a very failed business manager. You stated you were well equipped to have these discussions so please counter my claim and explain why. And since you are "well equipped" you shouldn't need to google so much.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You asked for answers not explanations and I gave them to you. And once again, you broad brushed a question so I said it depends. On a number of variables. In general, I agree with your assertion regarding the private markets assuming a number of variables which I did not have time to get into. As I stated, I will be happy to give you my thoughts on what reforms are needed when I get the time. And I will do it in this thread. Patience is a virtue Nash.

As for Google, I have noticed you asking people to google a particular term or query numerous times on this board. I would agree with you that it is a good search engine. If you are assuming that is what I rely on for my information, once again heed the old saying about assuming. I assure you that you probably don't want to get into a comparison of educations with me. ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok  I don't mind comparing educations.  Keep in mind that there are a lot more "educations" available out there than a formal one.  Ask Bill Gates or Steve Jobs if they agree.  I have a basic 4 year college education( very average grades or maybe even slightly below average) and that's all and I know a number of Masters and Doctors whose annual income is less than the taxes I pay annually.  If you have a PHD from  Wharton, I can quite easily debate business issues with you.  So I would say, abandon the "my dog is bigger than yours" and just simply humble me via the debate..  I have a very close friend ( drummer in band I played in when in High school and college) who is a department head at NYU International School of Business and has served as a consultant to the Federal Reserve..  He and I have frequent discussions regarding business and economics that are pretty interesting.  Even though he is just a PHD at NYU, I have this suspicion that if I can discuss/debate with him, I can do the same with you.  One more note-  When I passed the securities exam a number of years ago, I was told that it is the third most difficult exam behind the Bar exam and the MCat.  ( don't know if that is true or just an opinion of people in my industry)  Our Chicago office recently had two Ivy League grads join our firm and, like every other potential advisor, they were told they  would have to pass the securities exam.  They felt it would not be a problem because they had recently completed an education that was second to none. Both flunked the exam.  Pretty interesting, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I don't mind comparing educations. Keep in mind that there are a lot more "educations" available out there than a formal one. Ask Bill Gates or Steve Jobs if they agree. I have a basic 4 year college education( very average grades or maybe even slightly below average) and that's all and I know a number of Masters and Doctors whose annual income is less than the taxes I pay annually. If you have a PHD from Wharton, I can quite easily debate business issues with you. So I would say, abandon the "my dog is bigger than yours" and just simply humble me via the debate.. I have a very close friend ( drummer in band I played in when in High school and college) who is a department head at NYU International School of Business and has served as a consultant to the Federal Reserve.. He and I have frequent discussions regarding business and economics that are pretty interesting. Even though he is just a PHD at NYU, I have this suspicion that if I can discuss/debate with him, I can do the same with you. One more note- When I passed the securities exam a number of years ago, I was told that it is the third most difficult exam behind the Bar exam and the MCat. ( don't know if that is true or just an opinion of people in my industry) Our Chicago office recently had two Ivy League grads join our firm and, like every other potential advisor, they were told they would have to pass the securities exam. They felt it would not be a problem because they had recently completed an education that was second to none. Both flunked the exam. Pretty interesting, huh?


Interesting. I agree there is more to education than formal education. I was referring to your comment about google. I have a four year degree with honors. An advanced degree from the top school in the state in my field with studies in a joint program at two European colleges, one arguably the most prestigious on that continent. Oh and I passed one of the exams you were told was harder than the securities exam on my first try, after self studying, and finished in the top 10 percent of those taking the exam in my class. Where's my cookie?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...