bullets13

if that's the case then he's guilty of exactly what he's been charged with.

the most recent account I've seen was that the vehicle was running in reverse, ignoring commands to stop. then they shifted gears and started going forward, at which point the shot was fired. what I'm wondering is whether the officer who shot was near the front of the car (following it while it was backing away), and when they kicked it into drive and started heading forward if he then was in/near the path of the vehicle and fired the shot. it would appear at this point that the officer used horrible judgment in shooting at the car. Perhaps a bodycam video will shed some light on the situation. If the video shows that the car is trying to hit him, or driving in a manner that put his life in significant danger, then while I'm not a fan of firing blindly into a car in most situations, I can understand why he feared for his life. If the car is passing by him without the officer having to move out of the way and he fires into the car as they drive by, that's a different matter.

this has absolutely no bearing on the case. Any time someone intentionally kills someone else it's called a homicide. Even if it is determined that the cop did nothing wrong, it will still be ruled a homicide. I'm not taking the cop's side on this one, just explaining to you. If you break into my house and try to shoot me, and I end up killing you, the coroner would still rule your death a homicide, even though I have committed no crime while protecting myself. I can tell that you're posting this because you took this to mean that the coroner is saying the kid was murdered. While this may be the finding of investigators later, the article here doesn't add anything to what we know. It was already known that the cop had shot the kid, which was all this ruling is stating.

he could've been looking over his shoulder while they backed up. but who the heck knows what really happened. supposedly there should be some body cam footage, and there oughta be dashcam footage.

This can't be true. Ghost Writer said you didn't, like for sure.

sounds like you don't know nearly as much as you think. if you're so biased to ignore the many problems that your sports programs have had over the last several years, maybe you aren't qualified to comment on them. It would appear you can't address the issue objectively. Silsbee has some great kids, and some great programs, but it's no coincidence that these things keep happening, and when they're happening this often, it's really pretty ridiculous to say that it's always the other guy's fault.

either way, it was a bunch of them

Believe sundgren struck out 7 and Dallas 11, if i heard the stats correctly. Heck of a game by both of these pitchers. Jack kept Silsbee off balance all night, and they never really threatened, and Trevis made several huge pitches to get out of a few jams. Dallas pitched the better game tonight, but Sundgren didn't deserve to pick up the L.

Leaving to beat traffic, gonna listen to the rest of the game

K, ground out, K. End of 6, 1-0 stangs

That's what it's looking like

Strikeout to end the inning. WOS leads 1-0 going to the bottom of the 6th

WOS scores first. Walk, sac bunt gets him to 2nd, K, IBB puts runners on first and 2nd. Throwing error at 2nd on a soft grounder allows the run to score from 2nd. Runners on 1st and 3rd with two outs in the top of the 6th

K, K, fly out to left. Tigers go down in order

Infield hit, sac bunt got him to 2nd, fc runner out at 3rd, K to end the inning. Going bottom 5 tied at 0

Tigers get the leadoff runner on with a single, to 2nd with a WP, but then Dallas strikes out the side. Going to the 5th at 0-0

Flyout to right, single, caught stealing, K. 0-0 going bottom 4

Well, it didn't appear to to me, and that if it did it was not by much and he got it back down in time, but if you're over there along the fence then you have a better view than me

Tigers go down in order, 0-0 after 3

1st clean inning for sundgren. Groundout to short, line out to left, groundout to 3rd. Going to the bottom of the 3rd still 0-0

High throw, appeared pretty clear that the 1st baseman kept his foot on the bag stretching for the the ball, but the ump got to do the exaggerated "throw took you off the bag" motion and called him safe

K, infield single, runner to 2nd on a passed ball, ground out to 2nd, groundout to 2nd. 0-0 going to the 3rd

Sundgren with a strikeout to get out of trouble. 0-0 going to the bottom of the second

Sharp liner to right caught for out 2 after a sac bunt advanced the runner to 2nd

Ump at first making hero calls, and the announcer letting him know how he feels about it. Lead off batter for wos on after a questionable call at first