-
Posts
83,950 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
528
Everything posted by AggiesAreWe
-
[Hidden Content]
-
Stephenville 1033 Springtown 1030 El Paso Bowie 1025 Dallas Lincoln 1015 LaMarque 999 El Campo 998 Lindale 995 Kilgore 994 FW Poly 986 Big Spring 977 Pampa 971 Mabank 968.5 Mineral Wells 961 Clint Mt View 940 Henderson 890 Houston Furr 888 Dallas Smith 865 Houston Jones 861 Houston Scarborough 746 Houston Kashmere 533 Also Houston Wheatley has had 3A numbers for several years, but has opted to stay up in 4A. If these other schools drop, look for Wheatley to do the same. Also, all Dallas ISD schools who have 3A numbers will not opt up this realignment. They will drop down accordingly.
-
WEDNESDAY REPLAY... BRIDGE CITY/SILSBEE!!!
AggiesAreWe posted a topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
This week's Wednesday replay will be the Bridge City vs. Silsbee game. Replay times will be at 1pm and 7pm. The replay is approximately 3 hours long. Just click the link provided at the appropriate times and listen in to a great game. Bridge City/Silsbee [Hidden Content] -
I would like to know what you said. PM me.
-
Silsbee vs *Orangefield Predictions?
AggiesAreWe replied to CATS80's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Orangefield's "field" has had two weeks to recover. It was not played on last week. It should be okay. -
Silsbee vs *Orangefield Predictions?
AggiesAreWe replied to CATS80's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Weather conditions? The rain is Thursday night, not Friday night. The field shouldn't be in too bad of shape by game time Friday night. -
Silsbee vs *Orangefield Predictions?
AggiesAreWe replied to CATS80's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Don't take this as smack talk, but I just don't see Orangefield winning this game by simply running the ball. The Bobcats will have to throw the ball and be very successful in it to defeat Silsbee. The Tiger defense will not allow Orangefield to just run the ball every play and be successful at it. The teams that have had success against Silsbee's defense has passed the ball. The mixture of run and pass has at times kept the Tigers on their heels. A strictly running team may have some success, but in order to defeat Silsbee, you will have to pass more than 10 times a game, and complete at least 6 of them for good yardage. With Orangefield showing hardly any kind of passing offense, I just don't see them winning this game. Also, with how the Bobcats have given up points on defense, I can see this game being at least a 2 touchdown win for Silsbee. The key for Orangefield will be if they can be successful at the passing game. The Orangefield rushing attack will have some success, but not enough solely to beat Silsbee. -
Saturday Headlines 10/24/2009
AggiesAreWe replied to BMTSoulja1's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
"New practice method keys win for Mustangs over Bridge City ( pics of school board members were put on the Stang tackling dummies)" "Silsbee handles Bobcat offense, scores plenty on their own, wins 49-21" -
Yes. And, don't just pray tonight. Everyday at noon, many have chosen to pray for this individual, his family and the Mustang family! And that is wrong. Not just because it was Silsbee...because he was a minor and the allegations. These kids' futures can potentially be turned upside down by allegations and persecutions by adults. I was one of the ones at bat for the Silsbee kids. Don't get me wrong, I am agreeing with you. I honestly didn't want anyone's name revealed, both in this case and the Silsbee case. I am just argueing the fact that these kids are minors. Bolton was a junior, 17 year old when the rape case came down, Franks is 17, all are what the law see's as not being a minor. They are considered adults now. I disagree. I believe that it depends on the charges. Just like a 13 year-old can be charged as an adult in the case of murder. There are no "charges". stang4life, you are correct. I apologize. Trey's name has been released, which is sad, but we cannot do anything about that now.
-
Yes. And, don't just pray tonight. Everyday at noon, many have chosen to pray for this individual, his family and the Mustang family! And that is wrong. Not just because it was Silsbee...because he was a minor and the allegations. These kids' futures can potentially be turned upside down by allegations and persecutions by adults. I was one of the ones at bat for the Silsbee kids. Don't get me wrong, I am agreeing with you. I honestly didn't want anyone's name revealed, both in this case and the Silsbee case. I am just argueing the fact that these kids are minors. Bolton was a junior, 17 year old when the rape case came down, Franks is 17, all are what the law see's as not being a minor. They are considered adults now.
-
Tied for 18th.
-
No, we won't. I wish like all get out that we could reveal what we believe are the details as, based upon the version has been revealed to me, it is favorable to Trey. But as this appears to be headed to litigation, caution is paramount. No, you won't lock it. Just keep posting a MINOR's name and not the reason for the conflict of interest. The conflict of interest, as stated at the meeting, was because of a conflict of interest because school board member Mary Hardin is the high school principal's mother (Paul Hardin). We can drag the minor's name through four pages of posts, but can't post the reason stated at the meeting for a board member to abstain from voting that resulted in a tie. Please, help with the logic here? Explain to me how Franks is a MINOR? He is a senior in high school, therefore he is at least 17 years old, could be 18. Those are legal ages of an adult in the state of Texas. I honestly wished no names would have been brought out, but they did.
-
How do you see Central at #20? I see them tied for #18th with Stephenville and Texarkana with 2 votes each.