[quote name="OLDREF" post="779173" timestamp="1269028480"] ST413..............YOU KNOW I AM FROM SILSBEE.....SO when I tell you that all of those charges in 2nd half were legit...they were LEGIT......I didn't like it ,but our guys came in outta control....they were easy calls...get a look at a disc....THERE WILL BE PEOPLE WHO DON'T AGREE......BUT IF YOU WATCH YOU WILL SEE [/quote] I agree, they were charges. BUT, that's what was frustrating the kids so much. Where I sat to call the game was right next to the Tiger bench. During timeouts in the second half, the player were complaining about the calls because they felt the Madison players were doing the samething the first half as to the second half. The first half they were calling them for blocking fouls, second half they turned to charging fouls. Like I said, I thought the calls in the second half were correct, it's just that the calls in the first half maybe were not so and that confused the Silsbee players. It was just kind of funny that Silsbee did not get a charging foul the whole first half while Madison got 5 blocking fouls then in the second half Silsbee got 6 charging fouls while Madison was not whistled for a single blocking foul. All these plays were simular to the ones in the first half. It was just frustrating to the kids. I will say this, Travis was telling them during the timeouts in the second half to adjust to the calls, that they are charges. The kids just didn't understand why it was different.