Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/12/2026 in all areas

  1. Looking at criminal records and such, the left finds some questionable people to support. I think the “mother of 3” had at least 2 of her children taken away. Surely being a possible terrible mother doesn’t justify any use of force but there sometimes seems to be a pattern of who is supported.
    2 points
  2. The local police chiefs in some cities have been disgusting. They are an embarrassment to the profession. That’s because police chiefs are often chosen for political reasons and not law enforcement reasons.
    2 points
  3. Okay, some new information to look at. I watched a video from Nate the Lawyer on YouTube. It covered the view from the a cell phone that the agent was holding (not a body cam). We probably all have seen it. But, looking at it again, it changes part of the narrative. The officer is did not step in front the vehicle as some on social media have claimed. He was being taunted by the wife as she was trying to get in the vehicle. The driver turned her wheels to the left and backed up. That swung her vehicle to the right and pointed her car at the officer. She then put it in gear and drove at him. Intentional? Accidental? I don’t think it matters. There have been so many claims, however, that the officer stepped in front of the vehicle in order to justify shooting. Looking at it again, it does not appear to be true. He was standing near the headlight to the passenger side of the vehicle. The driver backed up the vehicle, pointing it at the agent and then turned into him and drove forward. So many of the accusations from the start seem to be jumping the gun or wishful thinking to make ICE look bad. I know that for the people who have made up their minds, it will not matter. The decision on fault was likely made immediately and it won’t change. We sometimes get the qualifying comments of, I support the police but the agent should not have stepped in front of her. Well…. it turns out that he didn’t.
    2 points
  4. What you posted says nothing about trouncing Cornyn (not made by you) and the article that you posted was there site’s believe in a win and but the poll numbers. I remember on election night in 2024 the NY Times kept an updated likelihood of who was going to win. Later in the night as the swing states started coming in, the “likelihood” of a Harris win kept going down. It wasn’t the point spread but the odds of winning. I don’t doubt that Paxton has a better chance of winning. The latest poll that I saw from 3 weeks ago had Paxton at 29% and Cornyn and Hunt both having 25%. If anything neat that holds, there will be a runoff. I have seen no poll showing Paxton with 50% in the last several months. So a company thinks that there is a 2/3 chance that Paxton holds onto his lead. Probably. However, Paxton’s biggest challenge might be if Hunt edges by Cornyn and sets up a Paxton and Hunt runoff. Psrt of Paxton’s negatives certainly come from the perception of his legal dealings, accusations of corruption including bribery, impeachment and divorce. In fact that is probably keeping Cornyn close. Paxton likely isn’t seen as favorable as much as Cornyn being a bigger negative. Hunt could potentially upset the applecart if he can gain some late traction. Paxton and Cornyn are probably seen like Hillary Clinton vs Trump in 2020. Both were unpopular but who was seen with the least amount of negatives. If it comes down to Paxton and Hunt, Hunt might be seen as the shing light Just points to ponder…. .
    2 points
  5. Would love to see the Tigers win Tuesday, but I got BC taking this one by 10. Jasper is a horrific basketball team, so I can't tell if the Tigers have gotten any better or not based on last Friday's result.
    2 points
  6. you know I'm rooting for them, but HF seems really high at #6 with their 10-16 record and lack of quality wins. If it were my list, I'd probably swap the Huffman team ranked at #10 at 14-7 with close losses last week to your #1 and #4 teams with the horns at #6.
    1 point
  7. Needs to be a way for the Labor Dept. to classify paid protestors as ‘temp/part-time employees.’ That would curb a lot of the actions that are causing risky situations.
    1 point
  8. Was a package deal with his dad. Pretty obvious he will be HC in waiting.
    1 point
  9. My reaction is the same. I wish she hadn't been shot. But, I can't blame the agent for a split second decision in hindsight. She shouldn't have put either of them in that situation. SHE created the situation. The local authorities who are flaunting federal law created the situation. Not the agent. Not Trump. People say you shouldn't victim blame. Well...you should when they were disproportionately responsible for the blame.
    1 point
  10. I try to look at things from how I would handle things......If this person was someone I knew or loved, after watching the video, my first response would of been why didn't you just listen to the officers.......actually, that is not true, my first response would of been what were they doing harassing cops.......
    1 point
  11. 1 point
  12. I think the whole bmt is rooting for the rangers lol
    1 point
  13. Center has some of the nicest facilities in East Texas. The practice field is identical to the one in Marshall.
    1 point
  14. 1 point
  15. Those percentages add up to 110.4%. So those numbers can't be accurate.
    1 point
  16. She is also the beneficiary of a “Go Fund Me”.
    0 points


×
×
  • Create New...