Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/28/2025 in Posts

  1. I’ll be at the game today 4-1 this year.. let’s see if I can make it to 5. Pregame meal at Pappasitos for lunch right now, margs and fajitas, meeting with friends at Biggio’s for appetizers and drinks at 330, late night dinner at Pluckers. Fun filled day, Geaux ‘Stros!
    2 points
  2. LumRaiderFan

    Tariffs

    To be honest, outsmarting folks that hate Trump based on his personality rather than his policies is not very difficult, they are literally rooting for the failure of common sense ideas.
    2 points
  3. AggiesAreWe

    2025 Astros

    Hader sets an Astro record with 22 consecutive saves to start the season. McCullers is coming off IR and will get start tomorrow.
    2 points
  4. Today, the Supreme Court made a ruling that appears to permanently end what has become too commonplace lately, universal or nationwide injunctions. In the last couple of decades, it has become an issue with federal district judges issuing a ruling in court that stopped a nationwide law or presidential executive order. Federal district judges are the federal equivalent of a county felony judge in Texas. If you get indicted for a felony in Jefferson County, for example, you will go to trial in one of the three felony courts in Jefferson County in Beaumont. The district judge’s authority deals with a motion or a trial in front of that judge. The district judge is not an appeals court level but the trial court level. The Supreme Court just issued a ruling that the universal (nationwide) injunction was beyond the authority of the federal district judges. So when Trump or any future president issues an executive order or the DOJ tries to enforce a federal law, one of the trial court level federal district judges can’t with the stroke of a pen end the order or the law. The case is Trump v. Casa about birthright citizenship. The ruling today has nothing to do with that case which still has to be hurt. What it seem to do was to stop the federal district judges for putting a nationwide halt to executive orders. It seems like this has been brewing for a long time and the Supreme Court finally stepped in. Also Justice Amy Coney Barrett blasted Justice Brown Jackson who dissented in the ruling. Her comment was that Brown Jackson: “Decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary”.
    1 point
  5. Where is Newton located ? Is that a Louisiana team ? Ive never heard of them
    1 point
  6. Daingerfield has now entered the chat...🫣
    1 point
  7. If that's the case, kinda says how pitiful the other teams are that they beat. Wouldn't you say?
    1 point
  8. While all my children are grown, the Supreme Court gave Parents with children a huge win today as well as giving them some of their voice back. It does not make any sense why this had to go this far. The school can teach whatever they want, and parents should have an option to opt out of something they don't agree with ad don't want their kid to be a part of. [Hidden Content] Lots of wins for the Trump Administration as well! [Hidden Content]
    1 point
  9. Yes. This country’s biggest problem is the actual thought process(beliefs….right/wrong) of half the country. Kamala still got 75 mil votes. 48% and that’s after the worst president of all time and she was part of it. That’s scary….. 48% of the population didn’t learn much after those 4 years. they re not ignorant they re stupid plane and simple we have cities, counties, reps senators that Muslims or sympathizers . 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️
    1 point
  10. One of the comments I read about this issue. Thought it was very appropriate. “Sad what the party of Roosevelt, Truman and JFK has sunk to. Remember "Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country." Now its ask not what I can do for my country. Ask what my country can give me free.” Welcome to the New Democratic Party. They’re reaping what they’ve sown.
    1 point


×
×
  • Create New...