All Activity

Notice they didn’t burn down any cities because they didn’t like the outcome of a trial?????

I think the republican party is alive and well……so is the communist party. There are no democrats.

ECU scores 3 in the 9th to walk off Wake

Put that diploma down for a minute. I asked what happened to the 1/6 accusations. What a waste of money on that sheepskin.

ECU melting down. Wake leads

I would rather belong to a political party (that you say) is dying than a party that has sold its soul out to immorality, perversion and evil.

Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows.

High Point walks it off. Vandy Whistler headed home!

Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory.

If one member of the jury had decided no crime had occurred, it would have been a hung jury. No felony. But, that didn’t happen, so falsification of business records in furtherance of another crime is a felony in New York. Trump was found guilty by unanimous votes on 34 counts of falsifying records. 11 invoices +11 checks, + 12 ledger entries = 34. The jury was unanimous in deciding it was in furtherance of a crime. Could have been tax evasion (illegally deducting a hush payment as a legal expense), could have been money laundering, could have been election interference. 4 + 4 + 4 = 12. He’s a convicted felon.

My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter). Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion. But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup. If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred. The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony. And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too. The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.

Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated

The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel. I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.

Whenever a article brings up "right-wing" you know it's going to be skewed to the left. Meaning not going to be factual. I already told you what the jury instructions were.

Quoting Dershowitz is an opinion? That's interesting!

The Gateway Pundit is not journalism. It’s evident in their name. You know what a pundit is? Opinion. Not news.

Where’d you hear it? Talking head? Read the Associated Press journalistic reporting from inside the room. That good enough? [Hidden Content] judge told the jury,of committing or concealing a

Dershowitz: It’s a Day After the Ruling and I Still Don’t Know What the Crime Is – Merchan Took This a Step Further than Stalin – Supreme Court Should See This Case and Reverse This Case! Maybe the legal scholar Dershowitz should contact you and you can fill him in on the crime that Trump committed. [Hidden Content]

This is what is going on with Trump: Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime”

This was a misdemeanor wrapped around a supposed felony wrapped around another claim. It was 3 separate claims. Charging docs by the judge which has, to my knowledge, never been seen. This judge literally said to the jury: If 4 agree on the underlying felony, and 4 more of you agree on a separate underlying felony, and 4 more agree on a 3rd underlying felony, then they can add that all together and that would allow for the charging of a State misdemeanor be charge as a State felony -- even though this was well outside the statue of limitations!

How did he know? He’s another Trump shill who makes his bread as a talking head. Gotta have a better source to convince me.

Game day is 1 day closer! Let’s go ‘Jackets!!!!

Let’s go ‘Cats!!!!

Great season Liberty!!!

Here you go to support the claim of acting judge: At the 1:15 mark, Mark Levine, lawyer and former chief of staff to AG Ed Meese under Ronald Reagan, says he was not a full fledged judge but an "acting" judge handpicked for every Trump related case in NY city.