All Activity
- Past hour
-
Nice 9-7 win. Abreau almost blew it. King comes in Ks 2 to seal New season 158 more. Split is better than a seeep. Go Astros
-
I would assume, maybe incorrectly, that one cannot possess a valid ID without showing proof of citizenship in order to get said valid ID. What is the difference?
-
Lamar Baseball 2026
myrecordwashorrible replied to myrecordwashorrible's topic in Lamar Sports Forum
Lamar with a 9-0 win today. Nice day at the ball park with clear skies and a light wind blowing in from center. Durbin and Sparks went deep and Tab Tracy had a multi-hit day. Three pitchers combined for the shut out and gave up a total of 4 hits. Overall good day and sit tied with Northwestern at 10-5 at the "midpoint" of conference play. At TCU on Tuesday and then host ranked Oregon State starting on Thursday. -
Record breaking number of people showed up for The King parade. Midterms are really looking like ššš
-
Ok⦠just briefly describe the difference between requiring voter ID vs requiring proof of citizenship⦠in the manner that the SAVE Act would require. Because I bet you donāt know the difference.
- Today
-
Ty Cobb reacted to a post in a topic:
The Save Act
-
DCT reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump Effect
-
[Hidden Content] kind of a wild one
-
Three weeks into district season Team Silsbee 4-0 Bridge City 5-1 Vidor 5-1 LCM 2-2 Lumberton 2-4 WOS 0-4 Jasper 0-6 Big games coming up 3/31-4/3 Sisbee v Bridge City Vidor v WOS LCM v Lumberton Jasper at Sealy
-
Those fields look beautiful with that turf. Hope for the best for OF!
-
Shows how stupid they are. Or, they are for illegal aliens being allowed to vote. Pretty sure itās both.
-
From what Iāve read they believe itās voter suppression. Lol
-
What you saw was not someone's conspiracy theory. Grok is X's AI program. You ask for the info you need and in seconds it populates the answer. Throughout you'll see where it got the certain bits of info from. So, go back and read it. Gen. Flynn, just like Roger Stone, was set up to try and make him turn on Trump. When he didn't, they prosecuted him. Again, just like Roger Stone.
-
TheMissingBand reacted to a post in a topic:
March 8,2026 ā WTI Crude Hits $110. THANKS TRUMP
-
March 8,2026 ā WTI Crude Hits $110. THANKS TRUMP
BS Wildcats replied to HangPDFs's topic in Political Forum
Funny not one of you Democrats complain about the prices when Biden was running the show. Just more made up reasons to gripe. -
This question may have already been asked. Really donāt want to back through 9 pages to find out. Why are democrats against using a photo ID to vote? I know why, just want to see if any liberal here wants to tell the truth about why. Probably not!
-
Read my Bible. Pretty good one coming from a left wing democrat whose party has no problem killing babies or pandering to the homosexuals. Maybe you should do the same, you think!
-
AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic:
āIām Glad Heās Deadā
-
Trump effectā¦ā¦he can make people contradict themselves. Lmao
-
God used Judas to betray Jesus right into the will of God so no worries here. š
-
I think itās the pinnacle of hubris to think that God would pick a political side.
-
AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic:
Orangefield Athletic Bond
-
[Hidden Content]
-
You remind me of that individual that always says I am not going to church because thereāre too many hypocrites. And I say come on in thereās always room for one more. Point being we are ALL FLAWED INDIVIDUALS.
-
AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic:
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
-
Just keeping this up close to the top because oral arguments are this Wednesday. Thought we could continue using this thread. I still think this is going to be one of the most fascinating oral arguments in a long time, and it will have possibly the greatest impact on America as any case in the last 100 years or more. It will be interesting to see how things fall out in questioning. I see the 3 liberal Justices just going with the status quo. I see 4 Justices going more with the originalism/textualism viewpoint. I see 2 Justices being open to the original intent of the 14th, but wanting to make sure their ruling only applies going forward, and how best to address it if they rule for original intent. The arguments for original intent are stronger than many think. Getting over the hurdle of history is still a tall task. But, this SCOTUS has shown a willingness to break with bad precedents in previous rulings. So, we'll see.
-
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic:
āIām Glad Heās Deadā
-
[Hidden Content]