All Activity

Final Spurger 46 Big Sandy 66 Timpson 48 Chireno 58 Sabine Pass 50 Hull-Daisetta 43

1. Rankin vs Gordon 2. Jayton vs R Spring 3. Hamilton vs Joaquin 4. Muenster vs Shiner 5. Grandview vs Yoakum 6. Wall vs Newton 7. Stephenville vs Kilgore 8. Carthage vs West Orange-Stark 9. Frisco Lone Star vs Smithson Valley 10. South Oak Cliff vs Richmond Randle 11. Duncanville vs North Shore TIEBREAKER 12. DeSoto vs CE King 48-40

Final Evadale 50 Diboll 71 New Waverly 51 Hardin 47 Lovelady 64 Anderson-Shiro 45 Leon 47 Crockett 51

True. What qualifies those two to be certified fact checkers? Are is it a self proclamation? LOL!

Final 53-34 WO-S

Final 89-26 Lumberton

Don't know. These are just guesses on my part based on news articles, enrollment numbers, cut-offs, and geography. Will be interesting to see if I'm even 50% correct when it all shakes out. To me, it's as reasonable as anything else I've seen so far.

Final 73-53 Shepherd

I'm going on 62 years of age. Been watching local basketball for over 50 years. Jasper has always, ALWAYS, had athleticism. But not very skilled wise in basketball. Athleticism alone does not make a good basketball. Except for 2, maybe 3 seasons, they have always been pretty poor on the basketball front. One of the main reasons it's been that way is that for the longest time, they did not have a youth basketball program up there. Up until recently, was just no interest. Those kids entering middle school and high school just know street ball and nothing organized.

Yes. Actually sat near them and didn’t jar it. Was too busy yelling and watching. They are usually louder and they were not as many students as usual tonight

Just Students being students I’m sure lol

I don't know why they couldn't move MST and Milby up to 6A and have majority control of that district with the 4 6A schools they already have in 6A and let their 4A and 5AD2 schools reside in 5AD2 but they didn't do that last time.

I mean I believe there is a chance pretty much any school could be “good” one day… now saying a team could or will be a “Powerhouse” is a whole different story. When I think of teams that could be considered powerhouse teams at some point (Past or present) I think of United, West Brook, Silsbee, HJ, Kountze, EC just to name a few…

Final 49-30 Nederland

Final Kingwood 50 Splendora 25 Dayton 68 Montgomery 59 Livingston 65 Porter 51 Brazoswood 42 Baytown Sterling 66

Nederland - 22 SheWolves - 56 Final

Final PNG 64-56

That ain’t no lie!!

5A D1 Region 3 Mock (Rev. 3) 9-5A D1: East BWB La Porte Sterling GCM PAM Galveston Ball Friendswood BU Kingwood Park 10-5A D1: Central/South Pasadena Angleton Fort Bend Dulles Katy Freeman South Houston Richmond Randle Iowa Colony Richmond Tomas 11-5A D1: Houston/North Spring Westfield Houston Northbrook Houston Milby Houston Math & Science Tech New Caney Lufkin New Caney Porter Houston Spring Woods Houston Sam Houston 12-5A D1: Austin/CS/Pflugerville Austin Anderson A&M Consol College Station Pflugerville Weiss Pflugerville Hendrickson Bastrop Cedar Creek Kyle Lehman Lockhart Pflugerville Connally [Hidden Content] @Matthew328 Thoughts?

Nederland at United 5A #11-(12-4) District Opener

Not sure. It could be they’re not opting up any more. He mentions them competing at different classifications for some sports. So, he’s aware of something. Article mentions Sam Houston moving up also. I missed them in my mock. I’d put Sam Houston in 11-5A for a 9 team district. Another link that’s not behind paywall. Same article. [Hidden Content]

The article doesn't mention opt ups. He seems to be only looking at the numbers. He may not be aware there is any such thing as opt ups!

I think someone around here has had a 12 pack of loud mouths. I won’t mention any names, but her initials are Big Girl.

Off by 2 points. To think our two best players are both seniors. This may be a long next 2 years for Tiger basketball.