All Activity

For those who may not know him and for those who like remembering things from their past, here is The King and His Court. Feigner could strike you out pitching from 2nd base, blindfolded from pitcher’s mound, and behind the back from the mound. He was one-of-a-kind.

I hope you just misquote Trump based on your profession.

So, one of Epstein's victims Annie Farmer was on CNN and was throwing shade at Deputy attorney General Blanche for not getting back with her. I did a little research - she accepted 1.5 million. In 2020 she wanted to drop the civil charges against Maxwell because that was part of the settlement agreement to get 1.5 million. I get she is a victim, but I question her timing and motives because she seems to be supporting the narrative that she is upset because of Trumps "hoax" comment. Trump said hoax in reference to Democrats and media saying he was involved. It had absolutely nothing to do with her. Plus, we didn't hear much from her in the 4 years of Biden....

Not sure of his name but I heard he moved in from Canada for his senior year

Plethora of options. No main cog has been selected.

8-5A D2 looks about right.. I would put Montgomery at 2 and winner of MCM 3 and 4… I will say this I have Huntsville making it to the state championship game this year…. They won’t lose a district game.

23-6A 1. North Shore 2. Summer Creek 3. Atascocita 4. Kingwood 5. CE King 6. Humble 7. Channelview 8. Goose Creek Memorial 9-5A DI 1. Lufkin 2. PA Memorial 3. Barbers Hill 4. Galveston Ball 5. Beaumont West Brook 6. Beaumont United 7. Baytown Sterling 11-5A DI 1. La Porte 2. Angleton 3. Friendswood 4. Crosby 5. Kingwood Park 6. Porter 7. FB Kempner 8. Pasadena 8-5A DII 1. Huntsville 2. PN-G 3. Montgomery 4. Nederland 5. Lake Creek 6. Dayton 7. West Fork 8. Splendora 10-4A DI 1. Huffman 2. LC-M 3. Bridge City 4. Vidor 5. Lumberton 6. Hardin-Jefferson 7. Livingston 8. Liberty 9-4A DII 1. WO-S 2. Silsbee 3. Hamshire-Fannett 4. Jasper 5. Shepherd 6. Tarkington 9-3A DI 1. Palestine Westwood 2. Fairfield 3. Diboll 4. Teague 5. Crockett 6. Huntington 10-3A DI 1. Orangefield 2. East Chambers 3. Hardin 4. Anahuac 5. Coldspring 6. Kirbyville 7. Buna 12-3A DII 1. Newton 2. Woodville 3. Anderson-Shiro 4. New Waverly 5. Kountze 6. Trinity 7. Warren 11-2A DI 1. Garrison 2. Joaquin 3. Shelbyville 4. Timpson 5. San Augustine 6. Hemphill 12-2A DII 1. Deweyville 2. West Sabine 3. Evadale 4. West Hardin 5. Colmesneil 6. Sabine Pass 7. Hull-Daisetta 12-1A DI 1. Chester 2. Burkeville 3. Apple Springs 4. High Island This info came straight out of the magazine and not the digital subscription. Thoughts on these predictions.

It amazes me they don't understand this..... It's like they never took a history class

The people that will elect him—if it happens—will be the ones that can’t afford to leave. That’s the audience (and brainwashed young people) he’s catering to… It’ll be the typical socialist/communist downward spiral that’s proven out through history everywhere it’s been tried. Of course, there’s always the idiots that believe it’ll be different for them.

Either way the Electoral votes will change. Trump is instituting voting safeguards, eliminating fraud, plus people are fleeing blue states like crazy, and red states are gaining. In the next 3.5 years, this effect will be magnified even more. Watch for a mass exodos from NY as soon as the Democrats elect their Communist mayor.

Republicans would be wise—while they have the majority in both House & Senate—to pass a law that ties Federal funding to a census that only counts legal, permanent residents. Separate it from the decennial census. Funding isn’t mandated by the Constitution in Article 1.

Why didn’t he wait on the new census rather than pushing Texas to change district maps?

You are probably right, but if @Boyz N Da Hood wants an adult discussion, he should.......

THIS will be a fight. Democrats have a lot to lose.

…. and gerrymandering.

How the decennial census affects funding. [Hidden Content]

This will be ruled unconstitutional as it's being described. The official decennial census is to count ALL people--except for Indians not paying taxes (which I don't think there are any nowadays). Asking if someone is a citizen, or permanent legal resident isn't illegal. SCOTUS just said the justification needs to be there. They never ruled it unconstitutional. Whether someone is here temporarily (illegal immigrant) for apportionment/monetary funding benefit will be a SCOTUS question that hasn't been addressed. Logically, temporary residents shouldn't be used for this purpose. This is actually how sanctuary cities receive a great deal of the funding to remain sanctuary cities. If they have to pay themselves, there's much less of an incentive to flout immigration laws. This is actually as big an issue as representation, and doesn't receive near the attention. The Feds dole out around $1.5-2 Trillion every year based on census numbers gathered. If temporary people (which illegal immigrants should be considered) are counted, it skews not only representation and creates under-representation for millions of citizens and legal residents, it also deprives them of funding. This is against their Constitutional rights of equal representation. This will be an interesting case, and will take a while to perculate.

WOW!

This new census will NOT include illegal aliens! Excellent!

I care nothing about Obama except that he will answer for his role in the Russia collusion hoax,

Video

That doesn’t surprise me about Obama. Was it an interesting read?

Liberal Reading Comprehension thread started by @5GallonBucket a few days ago. Obama’s interview about men’s lack of feelings. [Hidden Content]