All Activity

I work at a bank, possibly protecting YOUR money if you use a bank. To open an account we require two forms of ID, which 1st form is typically a DL or State ID. How would you like of the bank gave away your money because someone stole your wallet, grabbed your Social security card, came to the bank pretending to be you and the bank gave him 10 grand out of your account? I bet you and every other Dem would support photo ID when it comes to taking money from your account. Nothing is fraud proof, including photo id, but it helps.....just like the wall helps but people, with time, can figure out a way around it. The newest fraud is stealing bank statements and ordering a fake DL with your info and their picture....then walking into a bank you bank out in a different town, they claim to be traveling and get a couple thousand to stay under radar.....They can do that at a few different banks before they are caught. It is difficult to claim someone is not who they claim to be,,,,,,because if you are wrong, it's a bad look..... This will pass the senate

Pam Bondie yesterday at the hearing. She’s pretty spot on.

I am not even referring to Hillary but I wouldn’t put it pass them. IMO

Not taking anything away from this years team but I think the team Pete Regusa's senior(22-23) year was a little bit better. The window is open this year for OF to win the region though.

The you would have to believe Hillary really murdered all those folks? I've never bought into the hype of that.

They should've been D2 but a D1 team didn't make the post season which moved them up.

Maybe a newsflash to some, but the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to vote for President. In fact, if a State decided they didn’t want to vote for the Office of the President position, SCOTUS would have to turn itself into pretzels to make them. The Constitution and other Amendments and rulings only guarantee that if one person in the state is allowed, all must be equally allowed within rules set by the State. As a libertarian, I’m not against photo ID for voting. I think it’s pretty common sense. But, if required, the burden should be on the State to provide a uniform, acceptable form of ID. The burden shouldn’t be on the individual.

Don’t know when this will happen. If you go to YouTube and search the blueprint episode 10 and go to the last 22 minutes or maybe last 24 min he talks about it and was very passionate and serious

Nonsense, it's not voter suppression. Only white liberals believe that the poor and downtrodden don't have the ability to get an ID.

Still no proof illegals affect outcomes. Dems voted against PHOTO ID, not voter ID. Voter ID has always been part of a remarkably accurate and transparent election process. Find the evidence otherwise. You can’t because there is none. Ergo, all efforts to “clean” the system are disguised attempts at vote suppression. They don’t care how, just reduce turnout.

This was Pam Bondi yesterday…literally.

Why can’t the DOJ disclose it and let these powerful people come after the DOJ? Is that not the number one thing that our government is suppose to do? ….Protect Us.

1. You’d have to ask them that. 2. Yes, you don’t think powerful people take out other people that would make them look bad and black ball their business dealings going forward?

Of course this is discussion - The question still remains - why don't they go public. If he 25 year DOJ is correct in his assumption in my original post, they will not disclose for fear of being sued. Money above morals?

I'm not sure about the campaign promises....I do know not all campaign promises can be done. I said that when Obama was running and was going to take care of terrorist......until he got the intelligence when he won his first term. if the DOJ was paid for their silence, it would of started with the Bush administration and remained through the current administration......without one single leak.....that in it self seems impossible

That’s a question you need to ask Trumps influencers who use it as a campaign issue. You know Bongino, Patel, Donald Trump Jr. etc. The list is long. If the reporting I read is correct no one in the DOJ will meet with them. Trumps influencers made it a concern to get him elected. I am just following up. It’s one of the reasons i voted for him. I believe this is a political platform to discuss political issues and this is just one of them.

Question 1. - if Obama and Biden administration had the names, can you make it make sense to me why they didn't go after them? Question 2. Do you really think this is to the level that accusers and families will need 24 hour security for the rest of their lives?

Question, why should you or I be more concerned about the pedo's than the ACTUAL victims? The victims that are alive and living their best life have SAID they have the list.......

Not sure where I got the info from at the time, as the post you're quoting is from 5 years ago. I said i got it from an article, but obviously I don't remember where the article was from at this point.

Is Beaumont in this area?

Reason is a solid news and opinion magazine. Very trustworthy source. But, it will equally offend Dems and Reps on occasion. It’s a Libertarian publication that’s been around a long time. I recommend more people read it for a different viewpoint.

Looks like a reunion of the 2008-2011 rivalry. Roberts was a PAM player, and Berneathy was LP’s OL coach. Is Morgan retiring voluntarily?

Elandon Robert’s is coming to Memorial. Said so on the The Blueprint podcast… OUT HIS OWN MOUUTH! Not confirmed officially, but he said he want to build the program and win it all. He talked about that 2011 team and how he was the under dog. Looking forward to seeing if he can elevate the program.

No.

Very hypocritical no doubt.