All Activity

If he can get Silsbee to play defense like PA Memorial, that'll be a good thing. I really hope the Tigers lay off scheduling too tough of a non district schedule these next two years. No sense in getting relentless beat downs.

Bingo. The applicant list wasn't the greatest but good. Money was an issue but also following Joe and taking over such a tradition rich program is a tough task.

Good luck Coach Brown

Would have been good as well

Silsbee pays terrible, there is going to be a negative over reaction to this hire, I think he will do fine, the negative reaction will come from people’s view of his lack of head coaching experience, but if they brought in a previous head coach people would say that guy didn’t win enough. I feel like a lot of people were scared away from replacing a legend with what is viewed as a down year in talent. The fact that is most people don’t want to take a $15,000 pay cut to hear about how they’ve run the program in the ground all year, when the fact that they had less talent than the previous guys probably had the last 15 years.

Should have been Travis

He is really stupid

Intresting hire to say the least

Figured you would be sad or mad.

Woww 😂😂

[Hidden Content]

Silsbee ISD @SilsbeeISD · 2m NEW ERA BEGINS | Silsbee ISD welcomes Cornelius Brown as the new Head Boys Basketball Coach! READ MORE: [Hidden Content]� We also honor Coach Joe Sigler for his years of excellence and leadership to the Silsbee Tigers!

NEDERLAND PLAYOFF HISTORY 3rd ROUND or FURTHER- 1994 TO 2025 1995- beat Silsbee / beat Hallsville / beat Scarbourgh/ beat Brenham / lost to Coppell at State Tournament 1997-1st rd. bye/ beat New Caney/ beat Brenham/ beat El Campo/ beat LCM/ lost to Fort Worth Highlands at State Tournament 1998- beat Dayton / beat Whitehouse /beat Jasper/beat LCM /lost to Corpus Christi Calallan at State Tournament 1999- 1st rd. bye/ beat Magnolia / beat PNG / beat West Columbia/ lost to Brenham in 5th rd. 2000-1st rd. bye / beat Longview / lost to LCM in 3rd rd. 2002- beat Livingston / beat Cedar Park / lost to Jasper in 3rd rd. 2006- beat Dayton / beat Kilgore / lost to Montgomery in 3rd rd. 2009- beat Montgomery / beat Magnolia / beat Friendswood / lost to Brenham in 4th rd. 2013- beat Dayton / beat Hutto / lost Montgomery in 3rd rd. 2018- beat Dayton / beat Galena Park / lost to Barbers Hill in 3rd rd. 2019- beat Galveston Ball/ beat Angleton/ beat PNG/ lost Magnolia West in 4th rd. 2025- beat Friendswood / beat Montgomery / beat Georgetown /

This is worth a listen! [Hidden Content]

This is probably before some of your times, but I was 12. Lol

AND…. the fail to ID law that I mentioned is Texas law. Under Texas law, if you are not driving or you’re not under arrest, you do not have to identify yourself to the police. In approximately half of the states, if lawfully detained, you do have to identify yourself to the police or you are committing a crime.

I can do nothing but speculate but I suspect that any fail to ID was before any arrest. Up until two years ago, the only time you absolutely had to identify yourself to the police was if you’re actually under arrest. Of course, if you were driving, you had to present a drivers license or identify yourself, but you could not be arrested for failure to ID. If a driver refuse to give his identification, the police had to do what I called the Texas two-step. They had to arrest the driver for a valid charge like an expired license registration and then demand an ID after the arrest. A couple of years ago, the state finally changed that law and put failure to ID on the driver of a vehicle. I am kind of curious if they actually saw him driving or was he in a truck that was parked? If the police were just randomly patrolling and noticed the expired registration sticker, but did not see who was driving, could they lawfully demand his ID? Again, with knowing absolutely nothing of what actually happened, I could see a situation where it was possibly an unlawful arrest and all charges could be dropped against the Bpd officer. I would hope that the arresting officer actually knew what he was doing and probably so however, I’m not always that confident.

If you liked that video, when it is over, there are several boxes that cover the screen. Click on the one that says “I saw the cover-up” . Some real interesting stuff that I think we all have wondered about for quite a while. I pride myself on being able to tell is someone is truthful or full of feces. Can I be fooled? Of course I can and so can any of us, but I still rely on posture, stumbling for answers, has it been rehearsed, gut feeling….etc. In all actuality, I fear for her life. Not sure if my videos are out of sequence, but they tie together.

It does not make sense he refused to ID, knowing he was going to jail.....I mean, wouldn't you try and NOT arrest a fellow police officer if you could?

Like almost any other job, he could be fired for violating any policy violation. It’s not quite an at-will job because there has to be cause. In an at-will job a person can be terminated for almost any reason. In his case there has to a reason. An arrest is not likely a valid reason (not proven guilty) for termination but convictions or toss in things like conduct unbecoming of a police officer and it could be. These are just traffic citations though. Was it an expired license plate, an open container and not presenting a driver’s license? Strangely enough, the license and expired plate are always arrest-able offenses but the open container is not if in your county. I suspect that he could get as little as a written reprimand (which is not public by law) or a suspension without pay like maybe 3 to 7 days. That would be public. I am fairly certain that the Beaumont police are under state civil service laws. All police punishments are public information however state civil service law only recognizes a suspension as punishment. Verbal or written reprimands are not considered punishment. So could he be terminated? Sure. It will have to hold up to the scrutiny of an outside arbitrator though if they have the same grievance process that we have. So the officer’s lawyer and the city can go to one of the arbitration organizations and agree on an arbitrator to come in and hear the case. In our contract the arbitrator has to come from out of state. It is kind of like a court because each side can ask questions and call witnesses who are placed under oath.Also, if it is like ours, the arbitrator’s decision is final as it’s binding arbitration. I really have a hard time imagining that an outside arbitrator would look at three traffic citations and determine that is a valid reason to terminate a police officer. What we do not know and probably will never know, is if any officer has any history of policy violations unless it was a suspension. This officer might have a spotless record.

Yes

I think it’s justified! [Hidden Content]

I agree with every sentence in this post!

Sells was MVP for the 7th year in a row 😉 I’m joking but it seems like it. Not many have been that prolific for 4 years. Braelon Bush recently was but obviously was on much deeper teams, especially his first 3 years at Silsbee.

@baddog posted a thread with a video about a cover up scenario. Interesting watch.