All Activity

Wow… this is very alarming. I’ll be waiting to hear the story behind this…. But for a LCM coach to be suspended makes you go hmm…

Correct. I agree. No forfeit was warranted.

My sources indicate a 3-3 vote regarding forfeit (I did not think forfeit was warranted personally)

4A D2 Bridge City 3 Hardin Jefferson 0 (25-21,25-17,25-14)

When Thompson was there, was WOS always at the top in enrollment?

4A D1 Bellville 3 China Spring 0 (25-22,25-19,25-20)

I beg to differ. I know his Dad is a coach. That also tells me his Dad wasn't good enough to get the most out of his kid. I'll say again -- give him 3 years with Dodge and you'd seen a dramatic difference. Contrary to what some may believe here there are differences in coaches. Some good, some bad and some in between. Regardless of the drop in numbers, WOS still has the talent. Just like West Brook and United actually has talent. But... Just my opinion.

HUDL film of the game. From what I was told it showed evidence of what was voted on. I'll explain in my post with the details that is coming.

Can you expound on that?

Snap Benefits in Texas I did a little math. A family of 2 can have a max income of $2909 a month…..which equates to $16.78 an hour if only one works. They would be eligible for $546 dollars per month of snap benefits with no kids….. Now family of 4, say 2 kids - same thing, one works, they can make $4421 a month, which is $25.51 hour….and then receive $994 in snap benefits a month….. Incentive to work or not to work?

Brookeland 71 Jasper 29

When I get the green light, I will give the details.

5A D2 Montgomery 3 Port Neches Groves 0 (25-15,25-13,25-21)

100% agree.

Anybody want to elaborate on what the hell this is about?

3-3 decision is correct more of an integrity issue over anything else no real rules broken but it’s definitely shady and sad

I got text of the actual vote. Who voted for. Who voted against. 3-3 vote results in no forfeiture of game. But, an LC-M assistant coach will get a one game suspension. LC-M AD/HC will not receive any punishment but the program will likely receive a public reprimand. As for evidence, there was video evidence. IMO, a forfeit was not warranted in this situation.

👀☕

And I would think #88 @ qb

Good post Baddog.

Not what I was told and you may be right. Still an absolute crock. The superintendent and athletic director of Bridge City should be ashamed of the accusation with the lack of evidence.

Was not unanimous. Vote was 3-3. BC and LC-M did not vote.

Unanimous decision in favor of LCM. The End.

I know all the details. Was asked to keep it off the site until today's 10-4A DI Supt. meeting was over and an official decision was made. I have been told the vote and the decision. Will post the details very soon.

I know only what I’ve heard which is second hand info.