All Activity

Right,wrong or indifferent after hearing this entire situation and BC sups comments if BC had won this game we "more likely than not" wouldn't have had UIL involvement nor this entire fiasco.

Tried sending you a message. Unblock me lol.

It was in response to the BC fan making the comment about them beating a 4A D2 school, I was being facetious towards that comment.

No not complaining just curious of what others around the area think. About how long till a team grabs on to a Slot T offense. Along with you change and adapt to the strength of your players. Just an open discussion.

I must have missed all this speed you speak of when I watched them earlier in the season.

This may be the most ridiculous comment in this entire thread.

Yeah if BC did not opt up for "travel" reasons this whole situation could have been avoided.

Edit: After watching the entire hearing, I was too harsh in my above post. (1) I didn’t hear anyone make an allegation that Gonzalez was directly questioned about where the armband was and lied in response, so I apologize for saying that he did; (2) I don’t think his conduct is clearly a theft, and we don’t have enough to say it was. It’s one thing to take something you know doesn’t belong to you, and it’s another thing to receive something and intend to return it or at least not keep it, and then throw it to the ground because you know you’re not supposed to have it (that’s certainly dishonest, but I shouldn’t have called him a thief without hearing all the facts). Also, testimony wasn’t clear whether he knew for a fact that the armband belonged specifically to BC when he received it. I kept waiting for someone to ask him that.

My disdain is BCs intentions were clear to me.... They wanted an lcm forfeiture. They weren't concerned with getting the watch returned or refunded or anything of that nature.

This should be an interesting thread. 🍿

Ahhh more slot t complaints. Are you suggesting the hyper athletic Buna switch to a spread attack?

the only reason they didn't have to forfeit this game is the UIL couldn't clear cut prove that LCM used the watch. but they are right on the cusp of it by watching the assistant coaches mannerisms on the sideline. You can pretty much tell by the way they all were talking they all knew it was "off" but you just don't have a smoking gun.

I watched the proceedings and the committee knows exactly what happened but these 3 words kept them from exacting further punishment....PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE

no competitive disadvantage could be proven through a preponderance of evidence. Big difference that you guys need to learn.

I’ve kept quiet about this, but I talked to a BC defensive starter after the game. When asked what happened in the first half, he nailed it. “They got one of our bands and knew our plays before the snap. We went back to signaling plays in from the sideline and they couldn’t stop us.” That’s the whole “adjustment” that BC coaches made… they stopped giving the plays to LCM. Like I said… they had to cheat to beat a 4A D2 school. Did Peevey forget how to coach or do they just suck up there? You be the judge.

I personally believe there was a competitive advantage in this situation. But like the DEC and SEC ruled, there was no preponderance of evidence to prove it so therefore a forfeit wasn't warranted. I stated from the get go that I didn't think a forfeit would be warranted in this situation. Public reprimands, probation and coach suspensions? Yes. But no forfeit. Glad this is over. Now my phone can stop blowing up.

I don’t make the schedule, nor have I made any comments about one team being better than the other. The situation at hand is concerning, and we’ll never truly know who would’ve won without the watch. Your disdain for BC is honestly pretty comical. LCM isn’t exactly a powerhouse — they’ll probably be turning in equipment in a couple of weeks just like the rest of the district 😂 So the idea that one program is superior to the other is hilarious.

Some people will just always land "jelly side up"...until they dont!

Someone help me here. I watched the entire thing. NOT 1 single time did BC bring up just wanting their watch back and/or ethical decision making or lack there of, recouping funds. Why they needed the watch back.... BCs ONLY discussion and complaint and commments were on lcm competitive advantage. And bringing up stats and their loss since we're talking about tones. Bc only wanted lcm forfeiture here. They didn't expound on anything else complaint wise.

I understand why the committee didn't find enough concrete evidence to forfeit the game or suspend other coaches. that said, did anyone that's not from LCM watch the proceedings today and come away with an opinion of anything other than everyone pretty much knew what happened, but also didn't feel like they could prove it enough to allow for further action? This is a horrible look for LCM, and they look worse rather than better after this meeting, despite the victory a few of the more delusional folks are claiming.

That was when LCM self reported an issue and the coach was punished.

Only thing i found interesting was the difference in plays ran and yardage first half to second. Alarming numbers but, not enough proof! But “adjustments” were made lol

It seems to me like BC had a better second half signaling, maybe they should stick with that instead of the watches.

Bc sup tried to claim competitivie disadvantage because they had to turn the bands off. But also said their terminology of plays was very basic and simple. Huge disadvantage 🤣🤣🤣 for ehat were stated as "master planners" in coaches

Yeah I was hoping they went down that bumpy road. Care to expound on the combined record of your previous opponents before lcm? Since highlighted that was your only loss