All Activity

Yeah, everybody is clueless but you. Post on Porter. You’re doing a fine job being a troll. CB would be proud.

They said Lamar starting pitcher went out with heat related problem, I think it was more not being able to throw a strike and when you did you got pounded

I wonder if a couple of other BU players will transfer out before the upcoming school year 🤔

Well when you don’t get utilized

As of now only Diboll

You obviously have no clue how x works. Acceptable sites like the mainstream media? Lol You’re clueless about how X works. You always attack the messenger instead of the message because you don’t like anything that makes your daddy Trump look bad. lol It has nothing to do with squirrels and nuts, I am just not blinded by the color orange.

It’s rumored, but it fits your narrative. You should be a democrat.

You post from garbage sites. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every now and then. Why not post from acceptable sites?

You may want to check your facts checker. Lol Grok says - Pam Bondi appeared yesterday, May 29th,No, she wasn’t required to testify under before the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door transcribed interview about the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files—not a formal sworn deposition. The committee had subpoenaed her earlier for a deposition under oath, but after she was ousted as AG, Chairman Comer downgraded it to a voluntary transcribed interview. That means she could decline certain questions—like ones about Trump—and wasn’t bound by oath. Democrats and Epstein survivors called it a cover-up or sham, demanding she testify publicly under oath instead. She admitted some redaction errors but shifted blame to others like Todd Blanche and the FBI. The transcript will likely be released, but it lacks the legal weight of sworn testimony. Whether she’ll face a real subpoena for sworn testimony in the future depends on the committee—Democrats are pushing for it, but it’s not guaranteed. This setup let her appear cooperative without full accountability.

So what you’re saying is you are still waiting for Bondi to release the Epstein Binder 2? Did you fact check the fact checker?

Hope you’re wrong but reports are saying different.

ESPN+

First of all, I’m 99.9999% sure that Trump will not give Iran money. And second, Trump won’t let Iran get a nuclear weapon.

So your saying Trump is not coughing up $300 billion to Iran for reconstruction?

Stop posting garbage. They have their own site which you seem to visit. You have hooked no one.

Simply fact checking garbage. To post garbage to induce a reaction is called trolling. I posted no reaction.

Again take the hook out of your mouth. Lol

Take the hook out of your mouth.

I read Hegseth as being the type guy to want to finish the job with combat. My gut tells me Trump is getting this ceasefire agreement/delay crap advice from elsewhere. Miller's probably in here somewhere, and I trust him as far as I can throw him.

Is it streamed? I can’t find the correct channel on Direct TV.

Since BH is 6A now, they may not play Katy again. Not sure how your coach feels about playing possible PO opponents.

The account @thatdayin1992, operated by a user named Hassan Mafi on social media platforms like X, is highly controversial and is not considered a reliable, verified, or objective news source. [1] While the account has a large following and is often amplified for its commentary on Middle Eastern politics, international affairs, and current events, it operates primarily as an activist and partisan commentator rather than an accredited journalistic outlet. Considerations to keep in mind regarding this account: Activism vs. Journalism: The content is heavily opinion-driven and frequently posts highly partisan messaging, which has led to accusations of spreading disinformation or lacking objective context. Lack of Verification: The posts rarely link to primary, vetted journalistic sources, making independent verification of their claims difficult. Community Consensus: The account is deeply polarizing. Supporters often cite the account for providing alternative perspectives on international conflicts, while critics regularly flag it as unvetted or biased commentary.

Can’t wait for you to spend this! 😂 Winning!!! ……Embarrassing