Jump to content

Blown Call Ends Perfect Game Bid With Two Outs in 9th


Recommended Posts

Did anyone else just see that?  Armando Gallaraga just got screwed!  On a grounder between 1st and 2nd, 1st baseman Miguel Cabrera makes a nice play in the hole, turns, throws to Gallaraga @ 1st, and Gallaraga beats the runner by a full step, but the 1st base ump inexplicably called him safe!  I'm speechless!  If that call's close, don't you have to give him the out regardless?  The thing is, it wasn't close!  He was out!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DETROIT -- Armando Galarraga of the Detroit Tigers lost his bid for a perfect game Wednesday night with two outs in the ninth inning on a disputed call at first base. Replays appeared to show Cleveland hitter Jason Donald was out.


Tigers manager Jim Leyland immediately argued the call with first base umpire Jim Joyce, and was joined by several Detroit players who surrounded the ump after the Tigers beat the Indians 3-0.

Galarraga (2-1) was in complete control throughout the night and on track for the third perfect game of the season.


Copyright by STATS LLC and The Associated Press
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it too, that is just plain garbage and another umpire this season trying to get his name in the paper.  Even if he was not sure just call him out, I'm sure Cleveland would not have argued the call.  Somebody get that man a voucher for TSO or Lenscrafters!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got to see the 9th inning of Braden, Halladay, and Jimenez this year, and this game seemed to have all the makings of a perfect game/no hitter with the great catch in the 9th by Austin Jackson.  You figure on a close call, like Anibal Sanchez's no hitter on the final play of game a few years back, they would give him the benefit of the doubt.  He just blew it.  I wonder now with all this recent umpire controversy, if the talk of instant replay will come back.  With today's technology, it's hard to argue against it now...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="the_real_deal" post="808642" timestamp="1275567627"]
He blew the call.  Everyone makes a mistake, and at least he admitted to it after the game.  He apologized to gallaraga and leyland.  Think about how bad the umpire feels when he gets up this morning. 
[/quote]
think about how bad the picture feels
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="westend1" post="808665" timestamp="1275573115"]
You know, I have watched the video several times, and arguably,he got the call right.  Watch the pitcher snowcone the ball, and the, gather it in after the runner crosses first.  Not saying he was safe, but it is at least arguable.
[/quote]

good point...


[quote author=the_real_deal link=topic=70239.msg808642#msg808642 date=1275567627]
He blew the call.  Everyone makes a mistake, and at least he admitted to it after the game.  He apologized to gallaraga and leyland.  Think about how bad the umpire feels when he gets up this morning. 
[/quote]

I agree. He showed a lot of class.

In full speed, that's a difficult call. I would assume it's always tough when the pitcher and runner are sprinting toward the bag with the ball coming from outside your frame of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="westend1" post="808665" timestamp="1275573115"]
You know, I have watched the video several times, and arguably,he got the call right.  Watch the pitcher snowcone the ball, and then, gather it in after the runner crosses first.  Not saying he was safe, but it is at least arguable.
[/quote]

So you can't snowcone a ball, and have control of it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="rounder17" post="808728" timestamp="1275585630"]
[quote author=westend1 link=topic=70239.msg808665#msg808665 date=1275573115]
You know, I have watched the video several times, and arguably,he got the call right.  Watch the pitcher snowcone the ball, and then, gather it in after the runner crosses first.  Not saying he was safe, but it is at least arguable.
[/quote]

So you can't snowcone a ball, and have control of it?
[/quote]

I believe the point westend is trying to make is that the gathering in of the ball could possible deem the runner safe.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="adminbaberuth" post="808735" timestamp="1275586626"]
ESPN MLB - Tigers P Armando Galarraga presented lineup card, shook hands with Jim Joyce before Thursday's game
[/quote]

i thought that was pretty cool, and also seeing the emotion that the umpire showed.  a lot of class shown by both of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    tarige
    Newest Member
    tarige
    Joined


  • Posts

    • They're just using Israel as the latest, best excuse to riot.  They are unhappy USA haters (probably hate everything). Look at the woman I mentioned in an earlier post, moves from protest to protest, been arrested over 80 times, and is probably funded by Soros and his ilk and without a doubt is a true blue democrat.
    • I have several dogs (inside/outside), cats (inside/outside), have had a plethora of pets (ponies, quail, rabbits, gerbils, mice, fish, ferrets, the list goes on and on). I am an animal lover; however, I would not base my voting decision on whether or not Noem killed her dog, Obama ate a dog, Biden ate a chocolate chocolate chip ice cream with dog crap on it. None of that resounds with me like National Security & Defense, the Economy, Taxes, Spending, Budget... With that said, Noem should have never brought it up. 
    • totally agree, but there sure is a lot of talk that this dog may not have been one of them.
    • you're doing exactly what you're mad at the media for doing.  you complain about their double standards, but then you're comparing Obama eating dog in a dog-eating country as a small child to Noem shooting a dog as an adult.  I don't like Obama, but give me a break on that comparison.  And let's be clear here, the media didn't sink Noem's career.  She sunk it herself.  Not sure why all of you guys are conveniently ignoring it, but there's a whole lot of talk that her dog wasn't a chicken killer at all, and that she just shot it because it wasn't a good hunting dog and she didn't like it.  If it was eating people's chickens, I have no issue with it, but it's looking more and more like she was trying to get ahead of things and fashion her own narrative before the actual story came out.  for what it's worth, that's the only way her decision to publish this stuff makes any sense at all.  Nobody will ever convince me that she and her handlers thought adding that story was a good idea, and had no ulterior motive to do so.  The reaction to it is the most predictable thing ever, even if the most conservative among us are just totally disgusted that 3/4 of the country disagrees with her actions.
    • Orangefield vs. Anderson-Shiro  Cleveland High School - Thursday 6pm, Friday 6pm, if needed Saturday 12pm
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...