Jump to content

Woodville (39) @ Newton (44) - FINAL

jdawg03

By jdawg03
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Fast Turtle
Fast Turtle

There is nothing wrong with Woodville. They are a very good team and has played two consistently great programs back-to-back, while barely coming up short in both. The 0-2 record does not reflect a ba

NewtonNation
NewtonNation

!!:39/44/F You've alerted the ScoreboardBot: Game Over Alert: FINAL - Woodville(39) @ Newton(44)

GATA!
GATA!

Both teams fumbled, both teams had penalties, both teams had injuries, both teams took a kickoff to the house and both teams played hard! Great first showing for this young Newton team.

Fast Turtle

Fast Turtle

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jds82 said:

Hmmm I know this is probably against UIL rules, but my thought is that Woodville should take these last two non district games and rest (forfeit), figure out their identity as a team (coaches included) and start district play on a clean slate. What say ye???

There is nothing wrong with Woodville. They are a very good team and has played two consistently great programs back-to-back, while barely coming up short in both. The 0-2 record does not reflect a bad team by any means. Woodville will be just fine and will beat a lot of teams this year. Good job, Newton. This is a young team and will only get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Setx fan

Setx fan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, jds82 said:

Hmmm I know this is probably against UIL rules, but my thought is that Woodville should take these last two non district games and rest (forfeit), figure out their identity as a team (coaches included) and start district play on a clean slate. What say ye???

I say your being dramatic 😂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrojanWarrior08

TrojanWarrior08

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jds82 said:

Hmmm I know this is probably against UIL rules, but my thought is that Woodville should take these last two non district games and rest (forfeit), figure out their identity as a team (coaches included) and start district play on a clean slate. What say ye???

Absolutely not... The teams they played are perennial powerhouses where you like it or not which one is a defending champion and the other one has won a few recently.  Woodville played the 2 games on the schedule and for them to be hanging around in both games speaks a lot about them.  I've teased @Woodvillian1980 all night but I'm a realist and not a fool so DO NOT count them out as the rest of the schedule is "fairly easy" and that's start with Liberty next week and I will pay attention to that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jds82

jds82

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

Absolutely not... The teams they played are perennial powerhouses where you like it or not which one is a defending champion and the other one has won a few recently.  Woodville played the 2 games on the schedule and for them to be hanging around in both games speaks a lot about them.  I've teased @Woodvillian1980 all night but I'm a realist and not a fool so DO NOT count them out as the rest of the schedule is "fairly easy" and that's start with Liberty next week and I will pay attention to that one.

I agree with you 100%. Playing top notch competition the first two games is no slouch. I would say about 90% of teams wouldn’t dare schedule back to back teams on the caliber of Franklin and Newton. It should bode well for Woodville down the stretch. I’m sure they’re not happy about the result but shouldn’t be discouraged. Keeping their focus and continuing to grow is what they need to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Setx fan

Setx fan

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Woodvillian1980 said:

I just dont understand why you kick a on-side kick and give them a short field...smh.

I understand your point but I think it's pretty clear we had trouble stopping Newton's offense. Why not try an onside when we've had success with it in the past? Especially in a non district game that really doesn't count for anything other than bragging rights 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Setx fan

Setx fan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, GATA! said:

Both teams fumbled, both teams had penalties, both teams had injuries, both teams took a kickoff to the house and both teams played hard! Great first showing for this young Newton team.

Newton definitely got some young gunz on that team. Freshman running back and lots of sophomores up front. Should be really good in the future 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,987
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • longball24
      2024 Newton Eagles football.

      By longball24 · Posted

      Look again.?  
    • eknights88
      Bridge City is open

      By eknights88 · Posted

      All day. How did LCM miss the playoffs is beyond me. It dang sure wasn’t because of lack of talent. 
    • purpleeagle
      2024 Newton Eagles football.

      By purpleeagle · Posted

      This is one of several posts. 
    • LumRaiderFan
      Hunter Biden….

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: In the days since Hunter Biden's laptop was entered into evidence in his Delaware gun trial, Republican lawmakers have called out the 51 intelligence officials who originally cast doubt on its authenticity before the 2020 election. "I think there needs to be an investigation into every single one of them," Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., told the Daily Mail during congressional baseball practice. "We know that the intel community never operates in absolutes, and the fact that we had 51 come forward and try to put forward a narrative that this was disinformation, misinformation, when everyone knew full well that it wasn't — that it was very real — that speaks volumes about the politicization and the weaponization of the DOJ [Department of Justice] and the IC [intelligence community]." Cammack also said their security clearances need to be revoked. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., echoed his fellow Floridian, saying the 51 intel officers who originally deemed the laptop "Russian disinformation" should face consequences. "100%, absolutely there should be repercussions for that," Steube told the Mail. "That's what the American people are frustrated and tired about, is they see all of these people doing all these horrible things, using the deep state to go after Trump and Russia-gate and Russia collusion," he said. "It was all a lie. "And none of these people have been held accountable," he continued. "So, if any of them are still working in government, they should all lose their jobs and then be sued if there's some type of cause that you can go after them for.
    • longball24
      2024 Newton Eagles football.

      By longball24 · Posted

      Please post the quotes where I said our athletes are better than yours and I will apologize 
×
×
  • Create New...