Jump to content

Meadows the Meadowlark


UT alum

Recommended Posts

Benjamin Franklin:  "Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins."

What you have here in these cases are two different things.  One is the freedom of speech.  And, with the Georgia case, the criminalization of the practice of law.  Nothing in any of these cases have been illegal.  In Georgia, they indicted Trump and all of his lawyers.  It's not going anywhere.  They just needed a photo op which is backfiring on them.  

Now I hear that the judge for the Washington, DC case has set the trial date for March 4, 2024.  Guess what date Super Tuesday is????  March 5, 2024.  Talk about more evidence of collusion on the other side!!

@Big girl @UT alum @DonTheCon2024

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Reagan said:

Benjamin Franklin:  "Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins."

What you have here in these cases are two different things.  One is the freedom of speech.  And, with the Georgia case, the criminalization of the practice of law.  Nothing in any of these cases have been illegal.  In Georgia, they indicted Trump and all of his lawyers.  It's not going anywhere.  They just needed a photo op which is backfiring on them.  

Now I hear that the judge for the Washington, DC case has set the trial date for March 4, 2024.  Guess what date Super Tuesday is????  March 5, 2024.  Talk about more evidence of collusion on the other side!!

@Big girl @UT alum @DonTheCon2024

 

What’s your definition of free speech?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2023 at 12:39 PM, UT alum said:

What’s your definition of free speech?

Freedom of speech is in the Constitution.  Now, is it absolute?  Of course not.  Unless it's obvious, the burden of proof concerning whether or not free speech has been violated falls on the plaintiff.  Yelling fire in a crowed theater is obvious not free speech.  So, how is it separated?  To not fall in the category of free speech, there has to be proven ill intent and malice.  Yelling fire easily falls into this category.  But, when it's not obvious, how do you know what's in the head of the accused?  

Like Trump and him being indicted for saying the 2020 election was rigged.  The malice part would be Trump believed 100% that the election was not rigged and went and tried to forcefully stop the transfer of power.  But there's no doubt he feels it was 100% rigged so there's no malice in what he's done.  And talking about alternate electors is all legal.  I believe Hillary did the same thing.  Oh, and BTW -- didn't AlGore challenge the 2000 election?  It got so stupid with the hanging chads and pregnant chads that the Supreme Court had to eventually step in and stop it.  But, yes, he had to the to challenge if he wanted to.  It just went to far.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,940
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...