Jump to content

*Beaumont Bowl Game 2..Central vs. West Brook Predictions??*


KFDM COOP

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest WBFan09

West Brook will have to score more TD's and even than Central can win....ya know how?? they have a kicking game but ill take brook by 2

it will be equal playing conditions which means the best team wins...either way both these teams should still be top(1st & 2nd) big high schools in the area

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be a good game. I dont see WB losing to Central. Dont expect to see the same off. louis may start in this game so the sky is the limit. Centrals defense needs a litte work to many missed tackels against lee. offensive line also needs alitte work if we see the same defense from WB long night for central. GO BRUINS!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be a good game. All those weapons are nothing if they are not unleached. You gotta turn them loose. I felt like our coaches did better than lee stopping our offense. That two back back field. Both weapons standing on each si de of Fobbs. What is the purpose of this set. Someone please explain to me what is this set supose to accomplish. Fobbs has a good arm. Why not use it. Back the defense up. Then run the ball. keep the defense honest. We can't do this against Tha Brook. We gotta open it up. We've got the weapons. we gotta use them. There's no reason for our OC not to be able to utilize this awsome offense. I know there's capable OC,s licking there chops to have this talented unit. I'm not saying our OC is not capable. I just feel it's time to prove it. Just a reminder, last year we went up 14 0 on West Brook. before the half. Hall could have put the game away by his self. There was noway that corner could guard him one on one. Our OC ran that hitch twice. Both times Hall out ran the defense for 6. Then its was as if his play calling had a melt down. We will need all cylinders to win this game. Like Forest Gump Say," thats all I got to say" ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year Central went up 14-0.  Hall ran a 7 yard out, broke a tackle and ran up the sideline for a score.  The other touchdown came when Central faked a punt and threw to the tightend who got run down inside the 5 and the Jag runningback punched it in.  After that WB defense put you guys on lock, just like they did the year before when your QB went for an 80 yarder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...