Jump to content

Sideline Warnings

Guest Wildcat 08

By Guest Wildcat 08
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Wildcat 08

Guest Wildcat 08

Posted
Posted

Sideline Warnings

They said on football game broadcast last night that officials will be enforcing the sideline warnings more this season. Coaches will not be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest coachhooker

Guest coachhooker

Posted
Posted

i dont really like this rule but it is a rule and lucky i am in the box so i cant get called for it and not really a football note but bonds just poped out

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOS92

WOS92

Posted
Posted

Hooks is on the field quite a bit, but certainly no more than guys like Neumann and Matthews. He's just called on it more on boards like this. But after Ned fans made a big deal about him doing it, I started noticing how much Neumann is out there - as did my fellow Mustang fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
-Central_Jaguars

-Central_Jaguars

Posted
Posted

Wildcat08 I don't know what made you come out with this thread but that rule has been ruled on Central the whole season on the Jaguars, every game they played last year was called  on them at least 4 times a game and you look across the field in which others coaches were doing the same and not once did I see them throw a flag on the other school. The refs even tell the coaches to tell the Central band to keep it down and they the others schools have horns, cow bells, what ever that is Nederland fans be rubbing on against the stands that creates noise like a washing board. Its really amazing how they just singled out one school and not others were unjust. Now they going to use that rule, thats funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted

Are we really discussing this..... 

This rule is about not being able to move the chains and set the markers to keep the game moving... not so much about the coach on the field.  That is a sportsmanship issue. 

This rule is about as bad as the block in the back that supposedly happened 50 yards behind the game winning break-away running touchdown....

This is why I do not officiate football.  Some rules are just stupid.

But it is what it is....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Klein Bearkats

Klein Bearkats

Posted
Posted

The purpose for the rule is primarily safety.  If you all recall, an official ran into a coach on a long run two years ago and the coach suffered severe head injuries.  He will never be able to coach again.  His family is sueing the Texas Association of Sports Officials (TASO) for damages.  That said, TASO will be extremely sensitive to this issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LLDad

LLDad

Posted
Posted

Are we really discussing this..... 

This rule is about not being able to move the chains and set the markers to keep the game moving... not so much about the coach on the field.  That is a sportsmanship issue. 

This rule is about as bad as the block in the back that supposedly happened 50 yards behind the game winning break-away running touchdown....

This is why I do not officiate football.  Some rules are just stupid.

But it is what it is....

What is stupid is the block in the back 50 yds behind the play (thats called a cheap shot).  Good call by the official (my opinion).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted

Wildcat08 I don't know what made you come out with this thread but that rule has been ruled on Central the whole season on the Jaguars, every game they played last year was called  on them at least 4 times a game and you look across the field in which others coaches were doing the same and not once did I see them throw a flag on the other school. The refs even tell the coaches to tell the Central band to keep it down and they the others schools have horns, cow bells, what ever that is Nederland fans be rubbing on against the stands that creates noise like a washing board. Its really amazing how they just singled out one school and not others were unjust. Now they going to use that rule, thats funny.

Well said!  Stowers point across the field to the other sidelines.  The ref don't want to turn around and look.  Kinda like a wrestling ref.  They never see what goes on behind them and then never want to turn around and look.  Wow. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted

What is stupid is the block in the back 50 yds behind the play (thats called a cheap shot).  Good call by the official (my opinion).

Key word in my statement was "supposedly".  If there really is a penalty then it should be called but I rarely see one that is a legitimate one.

As for Klein Bearcat's response, it was an excellent addition to the rule explanation.  I had totally forgotten about the coach that was hurt and I was not aware that he was suing.

I stand corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeboan

teeboan

Posted
Posted

The purpose for the rule is primarily safety.  If you all recall, an official ran into a coach on a long run two years ago and the coach suffered severe head injuries.  He will never be able to coach again.  His family is sueing the Texas Association of Sports Officials (TASO) for damages.  That said, TASO will be extremely sensitive to this issue. 

Well it's about time somebody gets it right. I am an official and this is the EXACT reason for the rule being a point of emphasis (again). It is a safety issue. You will also see spearing or leading with the crown of the helmet called more this year. Why? To keep kids out of wheelchairs! Not the ball carriers but the tacklers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleacher_bum

bleacher_bum

Posted
Posted

Kinda gets back to one of the basketball threads.  One ref may be more strict about this than the other official on the other side.

I'm OK with the rule as long as the infraction gets enforced in the correct manner.  In other words, don't take away a 70 yard run/reception  and TD away from a team because of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,990
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    praise086
    Newest Member
    praise086
    Joined


  • Posts

    • SmashMouth
      QB Controversy Brewing in Crosby

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Just because they are possibly in the worst 4A D1 district in Texas. If your measure of a "Championship" program falls at the level of the district (and an extremely weak one at that) then we have much different expectations and definitions of what a Championship Program is.
    • BBfan061
      Warren High School is open

      By BBfan061 · Posted

      What’s prevented them before this decision?
    • 88Warrior
      Warren High School is open

      By 88Warrior · Posted

      Well having the AD/HFC combined position hasn’t exactly been the answer over the last 75 years (or however long Warren’s been playing football).  This is probably the best move they could make with Smithey bailing so late.  At least it provides the kids with some stability as these two guys were there this past year. The program is been trending in a positive direction over the last three years why not stay the course with two guys who want to be there…Wishing the best for Warren.
    • baddog
      Trump In The Hood!!

      By baddog · Posted

      Infrastructure bill?? How many EV charging stations has he built? You can count that on one hand. What else has been done with those $trillions? See, you’re lying and you know it.  Those $trillion’s went to Ukraine to be laundered and come back to Schumer and Co. Why else would he get so excited about infrastructure?
    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Hopefully Texas will win their case in court to simply make suppressors legal without the federal tax stamp. I doubt it as the interstate commerce clause is far reaching. For those who may not know, in Texas a firearms suppressor is legal but they are still against federal law without a federal tax stamp. Texas removed them from prohibited weapons a couple of years ago. Texas is currently fighting a case in court that if the suppressor is manufactured completely in Texas and never leaves Texas, it would not then fall under the interstate commerce clause. The ICC allows any commerce that crosses a state line to be controlled by the US Congress under the Constitution in Article I. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...