Jump to content

Lumberton at Livingston


Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

 

If anybody can point me at a school with a worse district draw, I'd be glad to hear about it.  Last realignment cutoff numbers for District 11-4A-D1 wasn't very kind to us. 

 

Bridge City        791

Huffman          1075

LiCk'eM            1009

Livingston    1078.5

Lumberton      1125

Splendora        1145

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RaiderGirl2010 said:

Anywhere good to eat before the game that won’t kill my bank account lol

 

If you have time, go to Florida's Kitchen off 350 South.... Homestyle food.  Well, not like the food we had at my house, but it's really good.

Patron's in the Brookshire Brother's parking lot for Mexican.  Shrimpboat Manny's is good seafood, but probably a lil pricey. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

If you have time, go to Florida's Kitchen off 350 South.... Homestyle food.  Well, not like the food we had at my house, but it's really good.

Patron's in the Brookshire Brother's parking lot for Mexican.  Shrimpboat Manny's is good seafood, but probably a lil pricey. 

 

Everything here, just beat me to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

If anybody can point me at a school with a worse district draw, I'd be glad to hear about it.  Last realignment cutoff numbers for District 11-4A-D1 wasn't very kind to us. 

 

Bridge City        791

Huffman          1075

LiCk'eM            1009

Livingston    1078.5

Lumberton      1125

Splendora        1145

 

 

 

Welcome to our life in 5A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen both, Lumberton and Livingston play this year.  Very impressed with how much Livingston has improved since last season.  Also, impressed with Lumberton and their version of the slot-t.  I see Lumberton winning this game buy a couple of TD's.    

RaiderGirl,

I'm a big Tony Romo fan as well so I'm going to miss seeing your avatar.

😂🤣😁👌

 

Physical Atmosphere had this response to my earlier post.  Did I make an incorrect statement or something?  Not sure what he is trying to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

If you have time, go to Florida's Kitchen off 350 South.... Homestyle food.  Well, not like the food we had at my house, but it's really good.

Patron's in the Brookshire Brother's parking lot for Mexican.  Shrimpboat Manny's is good seafood, but probably a lil pricey. 

 

Thanks. We will give one of those a try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

If you have time, go to Florida's Kitchen off 350 South.... Homestyle food.  Well, not like the food we had at my house, but it's really good.

Patron's in the Brookshire Brother's parking lot for Mexican.  Shrimpboat Manny's is good seafood, but probably a lil pricey. 

 

Okay thanks! Get off work at 3 probably hitting the road not long after so we can eat before the game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

I just didn't know that Lumberton had their own version of the Slot-T I thought it was passed from Vidor to Crueder, Crueder to Crueder then Crueder to Lumberton. That's all, no big deal ! Good Luck to the Raiders. ✌️

The  only possible incorrect statement you may have made is " I'm a big Tony Romo fan" .

   

 

Technically Aaron coached in vidor as well, so it wasn’t passed from Credeur to Credeur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

If anybody can point me at a school with a worse district draw, I'd be glad to hear about it.  Last realignment cutoff numbers for District 11-4A-D1 wasn't very kind to us. 

 

Bridge City        791

Huffman          1075

LiCk'eM            1009

Livingston    1078.5

Lumberton      1125

Splendora        1145

 

 

 

I'm curious what the #s will look like for these 6 schools this year.  Lumberton has increased by about 100 and will likely be back in 5A.  How about the others?

BTW, cry me a river.  Lumberton will be back to playing schools with 1800+ kids.   BC with 791 playing schools with 1100 is not bad at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

This is the hidden content, please

 

If anybody can point me at a school with a worse district draw, I'd be glad to hear about it.  Last realignment cutoff numbers for District 11-4A-D1 wasn't very kind to us. 

 

Bridge City        791

Huffman          1075

LiCk'eM            1009

Livingston    1078.5

Lumberton      1125

Splendora        1145

 

 

 

Let’s be honest. Numbers mean nothing. A strong small EC or Newton team could easily beat people in 4a or 5a. Loving the excuses though. Typical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Raider27 said:

Let’s be honest. Numbers mean nothing. A strong small EC or Newton team could easily beat people in 4a or 5a. Loving the excuses though. Typical 

Whoa whoa whoaaa......Who could EC or Newton beat in 5a consistently? What district could they join and have consistent success? Im sure the coaches at both of those schools wouldnt mind being in 5a and keeping the same numbers they have, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Raider27 said:

Let’s be honest. Numbers mean nothing. A strong small EC or Newton team could easily beat people in 4a or 5a. Loving the excuses though. Typical 

Numbers do mean a lot, you're citing exceptions to the rule. They don't mean everything, but they have the A system for a reason 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

I just didn't know that Lumberton had their own version of the Slot-T I thought it was passed from Vidor to Crueder, Crueder to Crueder then Crueder to Lumberton. That's all, no big deal ! Good Luck to the Raiders. ✌️

The  only possible incorrect statement you may have made is " I'm a big Tony Romo fan" .

   

 

Maybe I shouldn't have said, "their own version".  I just meant that each coach has a little something different when they run the slot-t.  Some slot-t teams are based around the power (234/236) while some slot-t coaches prefer to base their offense off of the buck sweeps.(328/ 349, 8 hole-reverse)  Some slot-t coaches come to the line and make checks based on the defense. (usually trap checks)  One thing I noticed about Lumberton that is different from other schools is they get out of the huddle and to the line in a hurry.  They snap the ball before defenses can get lined up.  I've seen most of the area schools that run the slot-t and they all have had success with "their own versions".

 

As far a being a Romo fan, I can't change that.  Thought he was a very good QB.  Just wish the COWBOYS could have had a few decent defenses during his time.  He takes a lot of crap about not winning "big games", but in most of those "big games" he would put the COWBOYS in a position to win just to have the defense lose the lead.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Raider27 said:

Let’s be honest. Numbers mean nothing. A strong small EC or Newton team could easily beat people in 4a or 5a. Loving the excuses though. Typical 

Give me a break.... Those teams can beat SOME teams in 4A and 5A.  In some years.  

Newton wouldn't have a single ring if they played in 4a D1.  That's a fact. But yes, they can beat up on a lot of mediocre 4A teams like ours in a lot of years. 

Lumberton would have had more success if they weren't always the small fish in the local 5A District.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Give me a break.... Those teams can beat SOME teams in 4A and 5A.  In some years.  

Newton wouldn't have a single ring if they played in 4a D1.  That's a fact. But yes, they can beat up on a lot of mediocre 4A teams like ours in a lot of years. 

Lumberton would have had more success if they weren't always the small fish in the local 5A District.  

 

I can agree with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Give me a break.... Those teams can beat SOME teams in 4A and 5A.  In some years.  

Newton wouldn't have a single ring if they played in 4a D1.  That's a fact. But yes, they can beat up on a lot of mediocre 4A teams like ours in a lot of years. 

Lumberton would have had more success if they weren't always the small fish in the local 5A District.  

 

Football or baseball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I'm going to agree with this. Individual drills would be fine, but a varsity baseball player should not be involved in full pad practices during the baseball season. Especially, if he is a contributing player on a playoff bound baseball team. This is irresponsible and selfish of the AD/HFC.
    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
    • I wasn't arguing the point of how an AD keeps his job. The question was "what has happened to Jasper" as in their whole athletic department. They were much much better in those other sports even when football was successful. Not anymore. Something definitely has changed.
    • I just don't think it's as big an issue as what's being discussed. My opinion.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...