Jump to content

Predictions: PN-G at Silsbee


Reagan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JaspD55 said:

First half will be competitive, Tigers have lot of injuries, one out for season. Lots of two way players for trying to play 4 qtrs against PNG. Young OL, Receivers not very good yet. If they can get healthy by district should be ok. 

From what I hear, PN-G has some key injuries as well.   So my prediction won't be based on injuries...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JaspD55 said:

First half will be competitive, Tigers have lot of injuries, one out for season. Lots of two way players for trying to play 4 qtrs against PNG. Young OL, Receivers not very good yet. If they can get healthy by district should be ok. 

Whose out for the season?  Haven’t heard that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Broncos2447 said:

Png by 17 - too deep

Probably the most true prediction but not sure about the spread.  The tigers have the talent but do seem to always start slow;  that is also due to the quality of the opponents.  But PNG  will have a  big numbers advantage and we will be playing probably several both ways.  I hope my Tigers can pull it out but it will be tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • are you suggesting that if the football coach runs spring drills then the kids won't play fall ball without supervision?  Because if not, this argument has no relevance.  One doesn't take the place of the other.  one the AD has control of, the other he just tries to.  
    • I don't think it is overly hyped.. I am seeing less and less multi-sport kids when it can all be prevented.. A coach teaches l loyalty, work ethic, comradery, integrity, perseverance, etc.. to get kids to buy into their program. They talk about brotherhood and doing what is best for their community.... But some mean all of this  just for football... Kids see into this double standard and will quit.. either while on the field or off...  drives me crazy!!  and again... I work with these kids.. they tell me what they think.. so you can agree or disagree.. its their point of view!!
    • Hmm..... I tend to disagree. I was a multi sport athlete in High School and am now a coach. Kid is not going to be a very good hitter if he only hits in the spring and summer, I took BP and threw (to keep my arm in shape) during football and basketball season. Kid is not going to be a very good QB, WR or DB if he only throws passes, runs routes or covers receivers in the fall or during a few 7 on 7 games after baseball is over. And a kid is never going to be good shooter of the basketball if he only shoots during the basketball season. Skills are honed, not mastered, they need to be developed and practiced repeatedly.
    • and I'll concede that this is more realistic.  but a good AD can make football the primary focus without messing with the success of other sports.
    • but they're 10-3 this year.  playoffs in basically everything except boys and girls basketball, which i mean, that's understandable.  and from what I'm hearing, the different programs feel supported over there.  which is kind of the point of the athletic director.  It's not the football director.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...