Jump to content

The UT Alum " noose is tightening" theory


stevenash

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yeah, more than one channel, too. Read newspapers, as well. What’s your point?

You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging.  Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on.  By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why.  Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

You seem to think the investigation is still about collusion when even Democrats know it isn’t anymore, you don’t seem to be aware of the Muslim issues in Europe that they are acknowledging.  Don’t care how many channels you watch, lol, but whichever ones you are watching seem to keep you ignorant of what’s going on.  By your one channel shot I’m guessing you’re in the hate Fox crowd without even knowing why.  Try it, at least you’ll maybe figure out the collusion investigation is nonsense.  

News reference is because 90% of the links I see on here are foxnews links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Bottom line ( even though you will never acknowledge) is Trump DID NOT collude with the Russians and the election results are legitimate.  There are no spin possibilities left and the only "believers" are the Trump haters

Did I miss the release of the final report?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Reagan said:

This is the hidden content, please

This is the hidden content, please

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

Do you think it will ever be released?  Two years not long enough?  Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion.  But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians.   Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Do you think it will ever be released?  Two years not long enough?  Of course the Mueller report will report a "different" conclusion.  But I suspect that it will not implicate Trump in colluding with the Russians.   Please state to me that you believe that Trump was a willing participant in colluding with the Russians to rig the election. 

What's willing got to do with it? Influencing and rigging are two different things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

One is an opinion by Trump’s ex lawyer, the other one addresses the Senate Intel committee report. Did you get to the part where they reported that the Mueller investigation could reach different conclusions? Let the report speak for itself when released.

The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING!  If he did, we would have heard about it.  Second:  The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING!  So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING!  It's only a matter of time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Reagan said:

The mere fact it's been 2 years and Mueller has NOTHING!  If he did, we would have heard about it.  Second:  The mere fact Mueller has to stage these side shows (Ex; Roger Stone's early morning harassment) also indicates he has NOTHING!  So -- after a lot of wasted tax dollars -- he still has NOTHING!  It's only a matter of time!

How do you know what he has? If it was nothing, it would be over. You must be confusing this investigation with Benghazi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,944
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Raza012
    Newest Member
    Raza012
    Joined


  • Posts

    • That was an awesome video!  I feel so proud of these young men.  They proved the doubters wrong.  Bellville should be proud, too.  I know it didn't end like they had hoped, but we've been there, so we can definitely empathize with them.  Great season, Brahmas!
    • Meh.. Everyone knows this. The kid that got injured wasn't lifting weights. Supposedly he was hit with a helmet in his elbow. In my opinion the kid shouldn't have been put in that situation. AD should've told the Varsity baseball players to sit that one out. I have no issues with the lifting or conditioning. However, anytime helmets/pads are on there is a higher risk of injury. This AD showed a total lack of respect for HIS baseball program. 
    • Maybe.. however..  Many athletic director / head football coach have lost their job despite the athletic program as a whole being successful.. if the football team struggles.  On the other hand, when football teams are doing great but the rest of the program stinks.. AD/HFC still keeps their job. WOS.  Newton. .. programs as a whole were fairly weak during those many years of football power and very few people even knew it.  Or cared. Yet, AD/HFC kept their jobs for years. Meanwhile, I remember an AD/HFC at Barbers Hill lost his job after every program in the school won district championships and even had several team sports (baseball, softball, girls hoops, etc.) making runs at state.  But the football team was mediocre.  Fired. I'm not saying you're wrong, just that perception is reality.  And the perception is that your athletic program can suck as long as football wins.. it doesn't matter how strong the athletic program is if football sucks. 
    • 5A Bi-District Baseball: Friendswood vs. Nederland -Game 1: Thursday (May 2): 6:30pm -Game 2: Friday (May 3): 6:30pm -Game 3 (If Needed): Saturday (May 4): 12pm *All games at Goose Creek Memorial HS*
    • Baseball mafia can cry all they want but when the talent isn’t there it ain’t there lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...