Jump to content

All district awards


MoFo

Recommended Posts

On 12/23/2017 at 10:17 AM, MoFo said:

I can remember a time when the all district awards meant something. I know what you're thinking Mofo is butt hurt. Actually just the opposite my son is on the list and he and I both know he shouldn't be. He had 2 receptions during regular season. Bring back the days when these awards were an honor to receive. 

I’m in the same boat kinda.  I don’t mind the Honorable Mention part.  But it should be. My boy got HM in district 21-6A but so did a bunch of others that in my eyes took what ever meaning it had away. I already knew 1st or second team was gonna be a reach in our district with him being only a sophomore.

22 1st team 

22 2nd 

22 or less HM’s 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, GCM-RG74-WR8 said:

I’m in the same boat kinda.  I don’t mind the Honorable Mention part.  But it should be. My boy got HM in district 21-6A but so did a bunch of others that in my eyes took what ever meaning it had away. I already knew 1st or second team was gonna be a reach in our district with him being only a sophomore.

22 1st team 

22 2nd 

22 or less HM’s 

I agree.  Last year, my Son got honorable mention, this year, First team all defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MoFo said:

Pick 11 for offense, 11 for defense for both 1st and 2nd team. Make the award mean something again. You can put as many as you want on honorable mention list 

But wouldn't some players get short changed?  You want 11 players both sides.  Ok, cool.  What do you want?  4 D linemen, 3 linebackers, 2 CB's, 2 Safeties?

Offense, 1 QB, 2 RB's, 2 WR's, 1 TE, and 5 o-linemen?  Ok, what do you do with teams that run 5-2 defenses?  3-4 defenses? 3-3-5?  Nickel?  Dime?  I'm offense, you have wing-t that have No WRs...  You have teams that run spread with 4 wr's, 1 rb, no TE? Still 11 on both sides?  And some districts you have all spread teams.  Some districts, you have majority wing-t or slot - t teams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

But wouldn't some players get short changed?  You want 11 players both sides.  Ok, cool.  What do you want?  4 D linemen, 3 linebackers, 2 CB's, 2 Safeties?

Offense, 1 QB, 2 RB's, 2 WR's, 1 TE, and 5 o-linemen?  Ok, what do you do with teams that run 5-2 defenses?  3-4 defenses? 3-3-5?  Nickel?  Dime?  I'm offense, you have wing-t that have No WRs...  You have teams that run spread with 4 wr's, 1 rb, no TE? Still 11 on both sides?  And some districts you have all spread teams.  Some districts, you have majority wing-t or slot - t teams...

I get your point, but something needs to be done. These awards have become a joke. My son told me a baseball kid made it last year that only played in 2 games.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MoFo said:

I get your point, but something needs to be done. These awards have become a joke. My son told me a baseball kid made it last year that only played in 2 games.... 

District 21-5A has 18 kids on 1st team & 20 kids on 2nd team. I think that's fair for a district with 9 teams. I don't think that's watered down.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
    • I wasn't arguing the point of how an AD keeps his job. The question was "what has happened to Jasper" as in their whole athletic department. They were much much better in those other sports even when football was successful. Not anymore. Something definitely has changed.
    • I just don't think it's as big an issue as what's being discussed. My opinion.
    • It's common knowledge that this sort of thing happens on ranches, out in the country, etc.  I'd be willing to bet that a good number of people who participate in this forum have had to do something similar. That said, she's an absolute moron for putting it in a book, period.  The act of killing the dog can be justified, especially for those of us familiar with how life on a ranch/farm works,  but publicizing it is inexcusable for someone in her position.  I honestly have no clue what she was thinking.  60% percent of the country already doesn't like trump, and now his most likely running mate has a major controversy over killing a dog.  Pure stupidity.
    • There are times when certain things are appropriate, and when they are not.  We can agree to disagree on the appropriateness of star baseball players doing contact football drills in the days leading up the baseball playoffs.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...