Jump to content

#4 Texas A&M @ Mississippi State/ A&M loses 35-28


king

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Knight come's back in after he could barely throw the ball on the sidelines.  We call 5 straight passes, all incomplete.  He's hurt again on a hit out of bounds

 

Hubanek will have to win this one. 

Contact initiated in field of play.  He was not taken down viciously, good no call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, baddog said:

I guess Mississippi State wasn't told that aggie is ranked #4. Punt return for a TD with a huge block in the back. MS coach is furious, with good cause.

The refs have been brutal all game.  That was the 1st call that went A&M's way.  They even cheer when MSU scores, which reminds me of the Big 12 days.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

The refs have been brutal all game.  That was the 1st call that went A&M's way.  They even cheer when MSU scores, which reminds me of the Big 12 days.

 

 

 

Sorry Mack. Just got home and didnt' see that. In fact, I have never seen anything like that before. Was he possibly signaling to another ref that he was in? I hope so because there is no room in sports for refs like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, baddog said:

Sorry Mack. Just got home and didnt' see that. In fact, I have never seen anything like that before. Was he possibly signaling to another ref that he was in? I hope so because there is no room in sports for refs like that.

There is an old video of a ref doing that after Texas scored.  I doubt they were really cheering for the TD.  Most likely it's a signal of some kind that sensitive fans take the wrong way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TXHORN_ET said:

Where would aggie be w/o having Trevor Knight all season?

I don't think Hubanek is that bad.  He's a better passer than Knight, but cant run as well.  The sack/fumble was just from not having played much and being aware of the surroundings.  A&M's OC will have to adjust to his style to make it work though.  There is no way that you can have 2nd & 1 inside the 10 and get zero points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...