Jump to content

Crosby vs Barbers Hill


Red Dawn

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Red Dawn said:

I think you're a straight up idiot. But I do respect the fact that you're an all in idiot. 

Why are you namecalling because I've posted a prediction?  Your next question shouldn't questioned why I picked Ant Mound.  But I see you're still butt hurt about that Manvel loss.  Better get some thicker skin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Why are you namecalling because I've posted a prediction?  Your next question shouldn't questioned why I picked Ant Mound.  But I see you're still butt hurt about that Manvel loss.  Better get some thicker skin...

Just saying. Your not real logical. But I respect your passion. Sorry for the name calling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Red Dawn said:

Just saying. Your not real logical. But I respect your passion. Sorry for the name calling. 

No harm at all.  I do have an ulterior motive here.  I'm sorry if I come off like a jackarse.  

I'm just saying it seems that MECCA isn't currently playing championship football, like I know they could be...  at least they aren't yet.  Ant Mound, oh the other hand is playing VERY good ball, which could mean a great game with Crosby winning by 14, or a barn burner with BH making a few good plays at the end.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

No harm at all.  I do have an ulterior motive here.  I'm sorry if I come off like a jackarse.  

I'm just saying it seems that MECCA isn't currently playing championship football, like I know they could be...  at least they aren't yet.  Ant Mound, oh the other hand is playing VERY good ball, which could mean a great game with Crosby winning by 14, or a barn burner with BH making a few good plays at the end.  

BH deserves respect. I just think lots of difference between Manvel and Reagan vs Vidor and Santa Fe. 

But they are 16, 17 & 18 year old kids. So anything is possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Red Dawn said:

BH deserves respect. I just think lots of difference between Manvel and Reagan vs Vidor and Santa Fe. 

But they are 16, 17 & 18 year old kids. So anything is possible. 

You shouldn't just said Manvel.  Like I've said before, Reagan/Heights is just your typical HISD school. They'll only be a little better than some of their district mate, which is probably other HISD schools...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

You shouldn't just said Manvel.  Like I've said before, Reagan/Heights is just your typical HISD school. They'll only be a little better than some of their district mate, which is probably other HISD schools...

Typical HISD School with a couple of 4 and 3 star players?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Full strength this game isn't close.  It'll be interesting because of that one dynamic.  What people don't realize about Crosby is this defense is actually pretty darn good.  As a colleague of mine stated last night, "salty".  One thing I've noticed is they tackle well.  I'll say this, fake punt against at your own 13 against a team you know you're gonna beat by 40 no matter what is a bit different what you're going to run up against this week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

You shouldn't just said Manvel.  Like I've said before, Reagan/Heights is just your typical HISD school. They'll only be a little better than some of their district mate, which is probably other HISD schools...

Agree except that they had a purple of high end studs that I don't think many opponents will have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red Dawn said:

BH deserves respect. I just think lots of difference between Manvel and Reagan vs Vidor and Santa Fe. 

But they are 16, 17 & 18 year old kids. So anything is possible. 

Yeah the strength of schedule so far for Crosby has been A+ , BH more like a C+, Crosby is bigger and faster and has more depth , I'm gunna go Crosby by at least 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...