Jump to content

Huffman vs College Station


Recommended Posts

It is possible that they are the 2nd best team in region 3.


Really??! I said in my post that it doesn't mean they can't be beat, ANYBODY can be beat, just that you won't find a better or more talented team in the state. Just remember.......it's a series!! And no...not a CS homer either. Good win for Huffman to take game 1.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really??! I said in my post that it doesn't mean they can't be beat, ANYBODY can be beat, just that you won't find a better or more talented team in the state. Just remember.......it's a series!! And no...not a CS homer either. Good win for Huffman to take game 1.

Exactly. "You wont find a better or more talented team". The winner of this series will be the better team. Playoffs are how you determine the "better" team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen this year Huffman fields better than any high school team. It's going to be tough to put up runs on them. As long as CS doesn't hit some long balls Huffman has a good chance at advancing. 

Huffman hasn't allowed more than 4 runs in a game all year..... That's some good ball right there.  I think they have only allowed something like 40 runs in 31 games... That's a pretty good stat right there.  CS is loaded with stars but Huffman plays TEAM ball.  I think they take this series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huffman hasn't allowed more than 4 runs in a game all year..... That's some good ball right there.  I think they have only allowed something like 40 runs in 31 games... That's a pretty good stat right there.  CS is loaded with stars but Huffman plays TEAM ball.  I think they take this series

That is impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...