UT alum
-
Posts
1,974 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Posts posted by UT alum
-
-
The hammer is fixing to fall hard on Donald Trump.
- Reagan and LumRaiderFan
-
2
-
9 hours ago, tvc184 said:
So did they raise taxes and disguise it as a convenience?
They’re gonna take the $7.50 fee from the inspectors and add it to the registration fee. It’s not going in our pocket. We’ll have to still pay the 7.50 without any service performed. I thought the Republican way was to give us money back for unnecessary government regulation. Guess not. Take a revenue stream for small business and institutionalize it. That ain’t a conservative principle.
-
9 hours ago, Unwoke said:
Sorry Bud, I didn’t write the Texas statutes. It’ll go to the Texas Senate a will see what happens, maybe both sides will actually get to present their case like it’s suppose to happen. He is still allowed due process. You seem to skip over that fact. If he is found guilty under the Texas law and statutes then he needs to be prosecuted.
He overwhelmingly spank George P. Bush’s A$$ in the 22 election for reason.
You don’t seem to get that impeachment is like an indictment, the lege like a grand jury. A defendant gets no chance to defend in a grand jury proceeding. That comes at trial, which is what the Senate does. His opportunity to defend against the indictment (due process) will occur at that proceeding. Know your civics, man.
-
On 6/1/2023 at 10:48 PM, LumRaiderFan said:
That you still seem to believe there was Russia collusion, which has proven to be a paid for scam by your party, but still think the Hillary email scandal, Benghazi, and crackhead Hunter’s business ties to the big guy were simply vast far right conspiracies.
That’s not hypocrisy. That’s reason.
-
On 5/30/2023 at 9:38 PM, LumRaiderFan said:
Yep, what about your hypocrisy?
That being?
-
On 5/28/2023 at 3:52 PM, tvc184 said:
Yes.
DTC thinks Paxton is a crook and should be removed and when the Republicans did just that in an overwhelming vote, apparently DTC has an issue with it.
You would think the thread title would be, Republicans Do The Right Thing.
But not so with DTC…..
Uh, maybe because republicans doing the right thing is an aberration?
-
On 5/28/2023 at 12:01 PM, BS Wildcats said:
Another bandwagon for you jump on? But, it’s fine with you for the biden crime family syndicate to go unpunished? If he’s guilty, he deserves it.
Whatabout.
-
On 5/19/2023 at 2:12 PM, Reagan said:
Show me a legitimate news source that says it’s a lie.
-
17 hours ago, Reagan said:
I’ll never believe a word the man says. If his lips are moving, he’s lying.
-
I liked him. He was an honorable man from what I witnessed here. Sounds like we should all be glad he’s found his eternal prace.
-
On 5/15/2023 at 3:37 PM, LumRaiderFan said:
Another no brainer is there will be no one held accountable and the DOJ and FBI will continue to be used to undermine Republican administrations, that is if we ever get another one elected.
I'm sure we can if we can just pick the right candidate for approval from the American Idol masses.
No one is being held accountable because after five years of investigation by a handpicked Trump special prosecutor no crime was found. Not even an indictment. There’s no “there” there. Like Benghazi. Like the Hunter Biden investigation will end. You guys put Don Quixote to shame.
-
15 hours ago, SmashMouth said:
How many came through the southern border in the last 2 years?
I don’t know. Why don’t you invent a number?
-
22 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:
Fixed it for ya...
Then why did the 19 come through Canada in 2000?
-
20 hours ago, Reagan said:
Five Migrants on Terror Watch List Arrested near AZ Border Post-Title 42! And those are the only ones they caught! Shameful!
I’d say the southern border patrol is doing their job. Eighty this fiscal year (October 1, I believe) and only two at the northern border. Common sense says the serious terrorists would cross where entrance is more lax. You know, like they did before 9-11. Follow fear at your peril.
-
On 1/10/2023 at 7:15 AM, baddog said:
You read stuff in there that just isn’t there. I condemned them all. Stop reaching.
You can’t condemn and defend. You either shake the dust from your feet, or you go along to get what you want.
-
28 minutes ago, tvc184 said:
Only a point of law for a future discussion and noting that every state has its own laws…. not in Texas.
New York is the only pace this case matters.
-
47 minutes ago, Reagan said:
Alan Dershowitz is a spineless shill. Trump was found liable by a jury of his peers in a civil court, not a political court where public opinion matters. A civil court where a jury hears evidence and in this case had to reach a UNANIMOUS verdict on each count to find against the defendant. You fool yourself to think anything else.
-
1 hour ago, Separation Scientist said:
What's your take on philanderer-in-chief Bill Clinton? Have you ever expressed any outrage about what philanderer Clinton did even while in office? I don't think you have mentioned Clinton sexcapades even once, have you?
No whatabouts. No US President had ever been held civilly liable for sexual assault and willful, malicious defamation. There is no equal nor is there any false equivalence you can make.
-
7 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:
Didn't she say he raped her? Did the jury not believe that part?
Also, strange that she waited 25 years to bring charges right when he was running for President.
I won't defend him but anyone that thinks this is nothing more than a political hit and chooses to ignore the fact that this surfaced at this time for no reason probably still thinks Kavanaugh is guilty.
The good news is this is SURELY going to move Trump out of the way so DeSantis can be the next President, right?
To prove tape requires proving penetration by the penis. She couldn’t swear penetration because she couldn’t see it. Penetration by fingers is assault. It’s not a political hit. It was a civil suit, not a criminal charge. Six men and three women agreed unanimously on nine out of ten questions. Was Weinstein a hit? No. Sexual predators can’t get away with it as easily anymore. Nobody can “grab ‘em by the p***y” and expect to get away with it today.
-
7 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:
Try watching Biden around kids
Whatabout don’t work here. I’m
-
7 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said:
I won’t defend
but he s not guilty of rape in which she claims but guilty of sexual abuse. 🤔
not to take rape or sexual abuse lightly but why is this just a civil suit?🤔
Statute of limitations.
-
So, I guess the jury was rigged? I can’t wait to see how he’s defended in here. This IS the equivalent is shooting someone on Fifth Avenue. Will he lose any voters?
-
16 hours ago, baddog said:
Funny how they miss that.
I didn’t miss it. It’s so obvious it doesn’t deserve comment. InfoWars - the consummate conspiracy channel.
-
On 5/5/2023 at 12:16 PM, Reagan said:
Infowars? Really? The Sandy Hook deniers? I saw no evidence of Ray Epps doing anything but exercising his first amendment rights. No one was forced to listen or obey. No criminal trespass, no assault, no battery, no destruction of property. Tuckums and Lyin’ Ted just spun ya’ll up like a ball of cotton candy.
It’s Hammer Time
in Political Forum
Posted
If you think this is about politics, you’re delusional. Violation of the Espionage Act is serious and the court system would not have indicted if they didn’t have a lot of evidence. He’ll get due process like any of us would, but he’s in serious legal trouble.