CraigS

Pointing fingers (by obama) AT the "Radical Islam" would certainly help. Which is what obama will NOT do....that's my only point......he STILL hasn't recognized it as terror, much less Islamic Terror........
AND - It is him who continues to provide sanctuary for these idiots here in our country..in many cases after they go back to radical countries, and some even on the watch list..and could be prevented..so YES, he does share the blame.....an ounce of prevention, is better than a pound of cure!

Link please

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

Can't make a "mistake" if you stop it all together.....just saying!

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up

Trump being elected as the GOP nominee is a direct result of the last 7 (soon to be 8) years and KNOWING Clinton would be the Dem nominee. 

Not one single choice in the GOP lineup was capable of beating Clinton, nor did any one of them have the brass to speak so boldly against the current admin.........

Clinton "should" be kicking the crap out of Trump.....so called experience, the "Famous" last name, first woman president following the first black president......the stars are aligned.......but she is just that BAD! and the worse the Dems call Trump...it actually make her look even worse...cause if he IS as bad as the Dems keep saying.... and she is losing to HIM....how bad must SHE be......
Trump will win (not saying that's good...just better than the she devil) and will undo all of the bad that has been done to our great country over the last 7 years......Make America Great ... AGAIN!

One of the best worded explanations of the left I've ever read......
"The use of loaded epithets like "racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic" is a favorite strategy of the left, a shotgun approach to marginalize large segments of the population who don't happen to agree with their agenda. 

These are terms without any content. Most often, they are used to stifle an honest discussion of the issues, and alternative ways to address them. 
When they are invoked, they are intended to shut down rational debate and intellectual rigor. 

What exactly do these words mean, objectively?
Nothing. Which is precisely the reason they are levelled against the political and cultural enemies of the left. When a word is devoid of specific meaning, it is completely malleable, and can mean whatever it needs to mean at a particular time and in a certain context. 

Is it racist to cite facts about the deterioration of the family unit in the Black community? Is it xenophobic to oppose the immigration of substantial numbers of people from regions where a large percentage of the population supports ideas that are opposed to our culture and traditions, many of whom might intend violence against our citizens? Is it sexist to be appalled by the murder of millions of unborn children in the name of "choice," which is itself a word lacking substance if not paired with a specific action? Is it Islamophobic to acknowledge that Islam has a long history of aggression against the West? Is it homophobic to resist attempts to advance not merely tolerance towards a minority group, but approval of a lifestyle that is counter to traditional morality?

Hilary Clinton has publicly stated that those who oppose her policies must abandon their religious beliefs where those values run counter to the secular paradigm. Is that not a direct threat to their freedom?
Many more examples of leftist prejudice could be cited, but I fear this post might already be too wordy. "

One of the best worded explanations of the left I've ever read......
"The use of loaded epithets like "racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic" is a favorite strategy of the left, a shotgun approach to marginalize large segments of the population who don't happen to agree with their agenda. 

These are terms without any content. Most often, they are used to stifle an honest discussion of the issues, and alternative ways to address them. 
When they are invoked, they are intended to shut down rational debate and intellectual rigor. 

What exactly do these words mean, objectively?
Nothing. Which is precisely the reason they are levelled against the political and cultural enemies of the left. When a word is devoid of specific meaning, it is completely malleable, and can mean whatever it needs to mean at a particular time and in a certain context. 

Is it racist to cite facts about the deterioration of the family unit in the Black community? Is it xenophobic to oppose the immigration of substantial numbers of people from regions where a large percentage of the population supports ideas that are opposed to our culture and traditions, many of whom might intend violence against our citizens? Is it sexist to be appalled by the murder of millions of unborn children in the name of "choice," which is itself a word lacking substance if not paired with a specific action? Is it Islamophobic to acknowledge that Islam has a long history of aggression against the West? Is it homophobic to resist attempts to advance not merely tolerance towards a minority group, but approval of a lifestyle that is counter to traditional morality?

Hilary Clinton has publicly stated that those who oppose her policies must abandon their religious beliefs where those values run counter to the secular paradigm. Is that not a direct threat to their freedom?
Many more examples of leftist prejudice could be cited, but I fear this post might already be too wordy. "

The last guy is actually talking.  I'm sure he will commit suicide tonight with 2 bullets to the back of the head.  

One of the best worded explanations of the left I've ever read......
"The use of loaded epithets like "racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic" is a favorite strategy of the left, a shotgun approach to marginalize large segments of the population who don't happen to agree with their agenda. 

These are terms without any content. Most often, they are used to stifle an honest discussion of the issues, and alternative ways to address them. 
When they are invoked, they are intended to shut down rational debate and intellectual rigor. 

What exactly do these words mean, objectively?
Nothing. Which is precisely the reason they are levelled against the political and cultural enemies of the left. When a word is devoid of specific meaning, it is completely malleable, and can mean whatever it needs to mean at a particular time and in a certain context. 

Is it racist to cite facts about the deterioration of the family unit in the Black community? Is it xenophobic to oppose the immigration of substantial numbers of people from regions where a large percentage of the population supports ideas that are opposed to our culture and traditions, many of whom might intend violence against our citizens? Is it sexist to be appalled by the murder of millions of unborn children in the name of "choice," which is itself a word lacking substance if not paired with a specific action? Is it Islamophobic to acknowledge that Islam has a long history of aggression against the West? Is it homophobic to resist attempts to advance not merely tolerance towards a minority group, but approval of a lifestyle that is counter to traditional morality?

Hilary Clinton has publicly stated that those who oppose her policies must abandon their religious beliefs where those values run counter to the secular paradigm. Is that not a direct threat to their freedom?
Many more examples of leftist prejudice could be cited, but I fear this post might already be too wordy. "

It just speaks volumns as to how bad HC is, they know it, and they are scared to death that the freebies or social wrongs will be righted...they will either lose free stuff (or family/friends will) or they will be deported (or family/friends will) or they will be killed (or family/friends will) or they will be kept from coming here in the first place (or family/friends will) and the list goes on and on and on..... but they know HC as their candidate is there worst nightmare...... and TRUMP just might win it.
 

You mean like my daughters boyfriend? I think I've spoken to him a time or two or three.... 

But I would like to know how your "black relatives and friends" support the liberal democratic platform, yet claim to believe in God... I couldn't care less, to each their own.... but I'm quite certain God doesn't approve of  "Abortion, same sex, drugs, enslaving people, lying, cheating" so to support a platform that does openly support these acts, would not be very "God like" IMO.

Here is your list:
.
.
.
.
.

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!
 

OR, maybe it's only republicans that pick God! Don't see a whole lot of God loving going on on the left. Abortion, same sex, drugs, enslaving people, lying, cheating.... 

OR, maybe it's only republicans that pick God! Don't see a whole lot of God loving going on on the left. Abortion, same sex, drugs, enslaving people, lying, cheating.... 

OR, maybe it's only republicans that pick God! Don't see a whole lot of God loving going on on the left. Abortion, same sex, drugs, enslaving people, lying, cheating.... 

Maybe, maybe not. But how do you know without this incident, it wouldn't be "super packed" ?
Maybe the Bmt store still operating in the black, but would be at a higher percentage if not for the bathroom issue.
I'm also among the SETx that no will longer shop there, (I also know several others) even if they do change course.....you can't unspeak your words. I know where they stand, nothing will reverse my stance on boycotting that store.

Really?  You mean you didn't get there mainly by government assistance and claiming you were a victim whose ability to succeed was hampered by others?

No no no don't get me started on that issue. I'll just say this Idc if your black white Hispanic left right gay or straight. People think different that doesn't mean they have evil intentions. Again I'm not a spokesman for any group. I condemn hatred and violence against anyone. Some people let the media alter views on reality. Your next door neighbor they guy you think is a stand up great dude. Is still that stand up guy regardless of party affiliation race or sexuality. We let foolish labels destroy us always has and always will. People fear what they don't understand. And we refuse to even try to understand. 

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!
 

One thing in this thread I find interesting.  It appears that most of the negative remarks about this young man's decision, are not from Silsbee fans.  Most of them, even though they'll miss him, wish him the best.  To me, speaks volumes for the Silsbee supporters, and their respect for this young man.

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!
 

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!
 

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!
 

From a neutral stand point as far a Mackey is concerned......my kid did the same thing for much different reasons....for those reasons...it was a good move .......otherwise a big mistake. I know I'll get bashed for this but facts are facts.......academics are lacking and the competition just isn't there. Ultimately moved back to Silsbee her senior year. (and before any other dumb comments are made defending Evadale) 1) My kid is a DI honor student athlete (3 times state...two at Evadale one at Silsbee) 2) There are great people in Evadale, wouldn't change those friendships for anything. 3) Evadale (the district/the 2A class) has some athletes as good as anywhere in the state...just not near as many....as a competitor the better kids just aren't challenged every single play, every single week.
We did the whole get in the community thing...went to football games...blah blah blah....it just ain't the same...quite boring actually!

My Mackey opinion - He will be just fine, he will certainly enjoy being a HUGE fish in a TINY pond...He (and his parents) have their reasons and that's good enough. Wish him the best!