Austin1985

1. Atascocita 2. Dickinson 3. La Porte 4. Texas City 5. PA Memorial 6. Kingwood Park 7. Sam Rayburn 8. Splendora 9. Silsbee 10. Needville 11. West Brook 12. Santa Fe 13. Hamshire-Fannett 14. Jasper 15. West Orange-Stark 16. Wallis Brazos 17. Shepherd 18. Hardin 19. Cypress Christian 20. Diboll 21. Fairfield 22. Kountze 23. Orangefield 24. Elkhart 25. Shelbyville

one spot behind the top 😁

Congratulations United ✊🏿

Gonna be a long year from Spring ISD. When was the last time NS lost an opening game?

Welp, it was a great run but demographics eventually catch up to you

DC has this as a final The NS run may be over.......

!!:2/48/F

Back on topic: North Crowley 22 Lancaster 18 Is Lancaster that good or has NC come back to the 6A pack?

I saw a letterman jacket my freshman year @UTA which I saw 550-8 from said Dangerfield player. We were on pace to play them at A&M but Sweeny decided they wanted to be sacrificed to the foosball gods instead of us(SFA). Dangerfield 42 Sweeny 0

I just checked Ike's demographics....... Like Aldine and MacArthur, their football powerhouse days are no more

That Sheldon/Kingwood game is gonna something this year

Tepp or Stepp posed that Westfield may drop to 5A D1 next re-alignment.

1. Atascocita 2. Pasadena Memorial 3. Tomball Memorial 4. North Shore 5. Summer Creek 6. Manvel 7. Longview 8. PA Memorial(Home game) 9. Montgomery 10. La Porte 11. Brenham 12. Nederland 13. Bryan Rudder 14. Hardin-Jefferson 15. Kirbyville 16. Hitchcock 17. Caldwell 18. Madisonville 19. Fairfield 20. Palestine Westwood 21. West Orange-Stark 22. Joaquin 23. Apple Springs 24. Chester 25. O'Connell

Time for me to make a move

Surprisingly, the run defense wasn't bad. It's just odd seeing a team from PA not named SFA running a 3-4. I'll stop here

aht aht. You were the main one calling for a qb change so hold that. Also, there were other changes but you only watch(barely) one position

Nimitz scored once in the 1st quarter Memorial scored once last play of the scrimmage.........

Welp, I imagine most of those improvements came from the taxes generated from the LNG plants in the area And, they don't have the boys to fully participate so yes, close the campus

Remember 2 things: That 136 number, at least half are girls. Maybe more parents are sending their girls to SP than parents with boys for all the concerns listed. Also, that building is K-12. So there's a finite amount of room to accomidate(sp) 13 grades.........

A peroosal(sp) of the demographics of each DISD school would say otherwise. If you watched the SOC doc, the kids at the time had to walk out to get upgrades in facilities. Those kids and teachers sacrifice to create the SOC you see today......

Yep. Close that campus from open enrollment and live that 6-man life

Find out AAW because to me, if they have 1A numbers they should be able to decide if it's 6 man or 11 man Foosball. Always remember, at least half of that number we see are girls so unless girls come out, SP should be able to opt up or down Edit: All that yammering I just did is moot. SP is at 136 and you have to be at 109 and below to play 6man. That was dumb for me to think SP was a 1A school when they're 2A and have no choice but to play 11 man ball

Motivation in leaving PA for SP may be smaller student to teacher ratio vs athletic opportunity. They don't make football players like they use to

They are their own school district

IMO, no. The team was 6-3 when he started. The only game that was bad from start to finish was GBall. He should be given another shot to start but that's just me