Englebert

If you send a check to Hamshire-Fannett to cover the cost I'm sure they will build a field that meets your prima donna expectations.

If you send a check to Hamshire-Fannett to cover the cost I'm sure they will build a field that meets your prima donna expectations.

Are you really misinterpreting my post this bad? Really?
This is not about your opinion of the game. This is about you spending the majority of your posts running down Hamshire-Fannett and their facilities. If you want blunt analysis...it seems you are a simpleton that gets his feelings hurt when called out on your posts... so much so that you have to attack by deflection. I'm sure you will not understand this post, so get a middle schooler to explain it to you. If you would like to continue your passive pissing contest, move it to an appropriate section. I will be glad to show you how intelligent you are.
I find it odd (not really) that you refuse to "debate" in the political section, then spout off political rhetoric in the High School football section. Do you even realize the irony of that? Of course not! Someone will eventually explain it to you.
So if you want to continue bashing opponents facilities, or if you would like to get political (like you've already tried), then mosey on over to the political section if you dare. We will be okay, but I doubt your sensitive dairy-air can handle the bluntness.
Maybe this topic can now get back on track! Any childish retorts need to be moved to the political section.

You might want to save your money on English and grammar courses for yourself.
If you want to get into a pissing contest, meet me in the Political section. I will be more than happy to go down in the gutter where you reside. Until then, how about keeping it classy in this section.

If you send a check to Hamshire-Fannett to cover the cost I'm sure they will build a field that meets your prima donna expectations.

If you send a check to Hamshire-Fannett to cover the cost I'm sure they will build a field that meets your prima donna expectations.

If you send a check to Hamshire-Fannett to cover the cost I'm sure they will build a field that meets your prima donna expectations.

Because he can. Would you rather censor the "radical B.S."? Would you like to refute the article or attack the messenger? Why do you think it is radical? Could it be maybe this is mainstream and you are the radical? Who gets to decide? You? I think not...and I didn't even read the article. Please provide your rationale for declaring this article "Radical Right B.S."...just to peak my interest enough to read it for myself so I can judge your intelligence.

I heard the Russian collusion being fake was coming to light also, lol.

I have no use for your discourse.  I've read many post from you in the past. Feel free to be offended. It's past time for your side to be offended. 

It is amazing the lengths of mental gymnastics one will put themselves through to justify their hatred of someone. The showcasing of the self-defense mechanism is almost too comical.

If what you say is true, the 81 million haven’t learned their lesson either, but you never have anything to say about them.
Your TDS is showing.

If the party nominations were set, and the presidential election was held today, who would you vote for? If the Democrat nominee is Joe Biden, and the Republican nominee is Donald Trump, and no other candidate from any other party ran, who would you vote for?
Which Trump haters will have the guts to answer, and which Trump haters will tuck tail and disgracefully run from this question? I have been laughing the whole time I have been typing. I can only imagine the consternation some folks have to endure when confronted with such a simple question. Will pride prevent a response? Will blinding hatred elicit an unmitigated and very unintelligent response? Will shame give rise to a lie? It's sad but also comical to imagine the effects of TDS. This question is really just an exercise to further laugh at the TDS afflicted, but any response would be welcomed. 

If the party nominations were set, and the presidential election was held today, who would you vote for? If the Democrat nominee is Joe Biden, and the Republican nominee is Donald Trump, and no other candidate from any other party ran, who would you vote for?
Which Trump haters will have the guts to answer, and which Trump haters will tuck tail and disgracefully run from this question? I have been laughing the whole time I have been typing. I can only imagine the consternation some folks have to endure when confronted with such a simple question. Will pride prevent a response? Will blinding hatred elicit an unmitigated and very unintelligent response? Will shame give rise to a lie? It's sad but also comical to imagine the effects of TDS. This question is really just an exercise to further laugh at the TDS afflicted, but any response would be welcomed. 

I’m decent with a pistol, and I can fire a full magazine (15 rounds) in 7-8 seconds, maybe even a little quicker.  At a fairly close range (let’s say the distance between the car doors of two vehicles that are touching nose to nose, such as in this instance), even when shooting for speed rather than accuracy, the majority of those 15 rounds will land in a grouping not much larger than a saucer plate.  A human torso is probably 12-15x the size of a saucer.  A human head is 1.5x the size of a saucer. Even with a moving a target, some, if not many of those 15 rounds are going to hit what I’m aiming at.  I’m not telling you these things to brag.  I know many people who shoot better than me.  I’m telling you this to explain why a police officer is absolutely not going to wait for someone to shoot at him before he starts to shoot.  Even if the criminal is a bad shot it only takes one lucky round to end an officer’s life.  if he’s even marginally skilled with a pistol, especially inside 30 ft, the odds of an officer getting hit is much too high for him to wait and see if a criminal is planning on using the weapon or not.  Far too often people expect police officers to do things that create unnecessary added risk to an already incredibly dangerous job in order to avoid hurting or killing dumb criminals making stupid choices.  A few examples:
1.  Police should wait for someone to shoot at them before they pull the trigger. 
2. police should aim for people’s legs so they can “stop the threat without killing anyone.”
3. police should shoot one or two times and then stop and see if the criminal is giving up.  If the criminal is still shooting at them, then police can shoot again. 
4. police should always try to use a tazer first when faced with a deadly weapon.  

what it all boils down to is that police officers don’t have to put the safety and well-being of criminals who are in a position to hurt or kill them ahead of their own.  

You did try to convince us that a whole crowd of people holding up cell phones were giving the Nazi salute. I'm still laughing at that one. I don't know (and don't care) the truth of his political affiliation, but given that your credibility on Trump topics is less than zero, I would almost be willing to bet you are disseminating false information.

You lie again InMagaWeTrust. You are reading my posts.
The second lie in this post was that "you called me out". You got called out. You are even better than Biden...at least he normally sticks to only one lie per sentence.

FYI, he said he blocked you.
It’s in the lefty handbook, if you’re losing, quit and claim it’s because your opponent isn’t worthy.

He will read it. I know InMagaWeTrust would read it. So...you know. LOL
One thing that is hilarious is that he posts exactly like InMagaMan...every value espoused is identical. But he gets angered when he is called InMagaWeTrust. He must hate himself.

And you have INMAGAWETRUST 45 sucks proudly proclaiming some of his crowd would switch from R to D simply based on her testimony.
...and we're the duped fools. 🤣

You deflect on what your solution would be. How predictable.
Is four days worth trillions of dollars? The northern states lose power all the time due to the cold...resulting in lives lost. The northern states lose lives anytime they have a heat wave. How much should they spend on air conditioning every home?
How much should Texas spend on ensuring your snowflake existence has the power to make smores when the temperature drops below freezing? You've bragged on this forum multiple times about how well off financially you are. Why did you and your family not go to Cancun to escape the cold? That's what smart people who can afford it would have done. My generator kept me warm and cozy for the couple of days, so I had no need to join the affluent crowd you claim to belong to.
So again, how much should the Texas lawmakers extort from Texas taxpayers to make sure every government dependent person does not suffer any undue hardships for a few days? Please give us a figure.
Once you atone for you silly first complaint on Abbott, maybe we can then move on to the next two braindead points you made. History has shown you will refuse to partake in this adult conversation. History has shown you will resort to deflection and personal attacks. InMagaWeTrust is not smiling right now...and neither are you. Coincidence?

You deflect on what your solution would be. How predictable.
Is four days worth trillions of dollars? The northern states lose power all the time due to the cold...resulting in lives lost. The northern states lose lives anytime they have a heat wave. How much should they spend on air conditioning every home?
How much should Texas spend on ensuring your snowflake existence has the power to make smores when the temperature drops below freezing? You've bragged on this forum multiple times about how well off financially you are. Why did you and your family not go to Cancun to escape the cold? That's what smart people who can afford it would have done. My generator kept me warm and cozy for the couple of days, so I had no need to join the affluent crowd you claim to belong to.
So again, how much should the Texas lawmakers extort from Texas taxpayers to make sure every government dependent person does not suffer any undue hardships for a few days? Please give us a figure.
Once you atone for you silly first complaint on Abbott, maybe we can then move on to the next two braindead points you made. History has shown you will refuse to partake in this adult conversation. History has shown you will resort to deflection and personal attacks. InMagaWeTrust is not smiling right now...and neither are you. Coincidence?

InMagaWeTrust is getting upset. Lol

I'm going to disagree with you. Liberals think they have so many great ideas as long as someone else will pay for them. LOL
At least InMagaWeTrust is not protesting his Liberal sheeple persona now. Even he knows after his latest posts he has to own the moniker.

I guess we need to build a 50 foot sea wall to make sure we’re safe. 
Liberals have so many great ideas and no way to pay for it.